News Feeds

File:  ltr to Congress, 76 scientists 2012.pdfResource Type: Letters

File:  ltr to Congress, 76 scientists 2012.pdfResource Type: Letters

Weaving Hope in Times of Crisis: A Report of the 2nd General Assembly of the Global Tapestry of Alternatives THIS IS NOT YET PUBLIC, FOR INTERNAL REVIEW Introduction The second in-person Assembly of the Global of () took place in Bandung, Indonesia, from 12–17 April 2026, hosted at weaverGTAweaversendorsersGTAGTAalternativesGTAalternatives

Interview series made during the GTA Assembly 2026 in Indonesia Franco Augusto and Shail Sathi conducted these conversations during the “Global Confluence on Radical Democracy, Autonomy and Self-Determination (RaDASD)”, April 11-17, 2026. The recording were produced by Franco Augusto and ??, edited by Marco Andrade.

Headline News:

• “Parched Summer In Rockies Sends Bears Into Urban Areas” • A black bear opened the door of a Toyota SUV and got trapped inside it. The animal ripped apart the Toyota’s interior, as it tried desperately to escape. It was one of hundreds of examples of bears getting into more trouble than usual in the parched Rocky Mountains this summer. [ABC News]

Black bear (sawyer, Unsplash)

• “Why Moscow Still Has A Role In Europe’s ITER Fusion Project” • The EU and Russia are geopolitical adversaries, with Russia under sweeping EU sanctions and its ties to the EU cut back. Yet inside the world’s largest nuclear fusion experiment, the two remain linked by a partnership forged decades ago and built to endure for generations. [Euronews]
• “Global Trade Made Up 35% Of The EU’s Carbon Footprint In 2023” • The EU is making a full-on effort to cut its emissions, but 35% of its carbon footprint was generated abroad in 2023, data from the European Climate Foundation and climate consultancy Matière says. And globally, over 20% of greenhouse gas emissions are linked to global trade. [Euronews]
• “BYD Sales Outside of China Grew 134% To Record 189,466 Vehicles In August” • BYD reportedly sold 189,466 vehicles in August outside of China. That was 134.5% more than it sold outside of China in August 2025. BYD also achieved 5% growth, month over month. That happens often, and BYD’s sales outside of China often hit new records. [CleanTechnica]
• “Ball State Study Finds Utility-Scale Renewable Projects Have No Significant Effect On Indiana Home Prices” • A research brief from Ball State University outlines an analysis of 20 years of data for home sales near large renewable energy projects in Indiana. It finds no statistically significant negative impact on residential property values. [pv magazine USA]

For more news, please visit geoharvey – Daily News about Energy and Climate Change.

Dua pemain membuka permainan serupa dengan nilai transaksi berbeda. Satu memakai nominal kecil, sementara pemain lain memasang angka lebih besar. Ketika hasil keduanya bertolak belakang, muncul dugaan bahwa sistem sengaja menaikkan tingkat kesulitan berdasarkan jumlah dana. Dari sinilah anggapan mengenai hubungan Nominal Situs Slot Maxwin dengan algoritma mulai berkembang.

Dugaan tersebut terdengar masuk akal apabila hanya dilihat dari pengalaman singkat. Namun mekanisme permainan digital tidak sesederhana membaca jumlah transaksi lalu mengubah peluang secara otomatis. Algoritma Slot Maxwin pada permainan berbasis RNG bekerja melalui proses perhitungan hasil setiap putaran sesuai konfigurasi game. Nilai taruhan dapat memengaruhi jumlah uang pada hasil tertentu, tetapi bukan berarti tingkat kesulitan otomatis berubah.

Nominal Situs Slot Maxwin Sering Disalahartikan sebagai Pengatur Peluang

Nominal menjadi elemen paling mudah diamati pengguna. Angka terlihat jelas pada layar, berubah setiap putaran, serta langsung berkaitan dengan saldo. Tidak heran apabila bagian ini kerap dianggap sebagai faktor utama saat hasil permainan berubah. Padahal ada perbedaan antara nilai taruhan dan probabilitas. Taruhan menentukan besarnya nilai finansial pada satu putaran. Probabilitas berkaitan dengan struktur matematika permainan, kombinasi simbol, tabel pembayaran, volatilitas, serta konfigurasi sistem. Situs Slot Maxwin pada dasarnya menjadi medium akses menuju permainan dari provider. Jika game memakai sistem RNG, hasil putaran tidak semestinya ditentukan hanya karena pemain menaikkan atau menurunkan nominal.

Nominal Besar Membuat Perubahan Saldo Terlihat Lebih Dramatis

Ada alasan psikologis mengapa nominal tinggi terasa lebih sulit. Ketika nilai per putaran meningkat, perubahan saldo juga berlangsung lebih cepat. Beberapa hasil tanpa pembayaran bisa menciptakan penurunan cukup besar dalam waktu singkat. Situasi tersebut mudah diterjemahkan sebagai peningkatan kesulitan. Padahal mekanisme dasarnya dapat tetap sama. Sebaliknya, nominal kecil membuat perubahan saldo tampak lebih lambat. Durasi bermain dapat terasa panjang sehingga pengguna memperoleh lebih banyak kesempatan melihat variasi hasil. Perbedaan pengalaman ini sering membentuk persepsi keliru mengenai Algoritma Slot Maxwin.

Bagaimana Algoritma Slot Maxwin Membentuk Hasil Putaran?

Permainan slot digital umumnya menggunakan Random Number Generator untuk menghasilkan keluaran secara acak sesuai parameter permainan. Sistem tersebut berjalan pada setiap putaran dan menentukan susunan simbol berdasarkan aturan internal game. Di sisi lain, ada RTP teoretis serta volatilitas. RTP menggambarkan persentase pengembalian secara matematis dalam simulasi jangka sangat panjang, bukan janji hasil pada satu sesi. Volatilitas menjelaskan karakter distribusi pembayaran. Game bervolatilitas tinggi dapat memiliki rentang hasil lebih lebar, sedangkan volatilitas rendah cenderung menghasilkan distribusi berbeda. Karena itu, membahas Algoritma Slot Maxwin hanya melalui nominal transaksi mengabaikan banyak variabel teknis lain.

Perubahan Nilai Taruhan Tidak Sama dengan Perubahan Mesin

Saat pemain berpindah dari Rp1.000 menjadi Rp10.000 per putaran, efek paling nyata terdapat pada nilai uang. Jika kombinasi memberikan pembayaran 20 kali taruhan, hasil finansial tentu berbeda. Namun peningkatan tersebut tidak otomatis membuktikan bahwa sistem masuk ke mode lebih sulit. Pengecualian bisa muncul pada permainan dengan fitur, jackpot, atau syarat tertentu berdasarkan level taruhan. Informasi semacam ini seharusnya tercantum pada aturan permainan. Karena setiap produk memiliki konfigurasi berbeda, pengguna perlu membaca paytable serta informasi fitur daripada menganggap semua game memakai pola identik.

Mengapa Mitos Nominal Mengubah Algoritma Mudah Menyebar?

Pengalaman pribadi memiliki pengaruh besar terhadap cara pemain membaca pola. Seseorang mungkin menaikkan taruhan lalu mengalami beberapa putaran tanpa hasil. Kejadian tersebut kemudian dianggap sebagai bukti hubungan sebab-akibat. Masalahnya, sampel beberapa putaran terlalu kecil untuk menjelaskan sistem probabilitas. Cerita komunitas juga memperkuat kesan tersebut. Pengalaman unik lebih sering dibagikan dibanding sesi biasa. Akibatnya, pengguna melihat kumpulan cerita ekstrem dan merasa pola serupa terjadi secara konsisten pada Situs Slot Maxwin. Bias konfirmasi ikut berperan. Setelah seseorang percaya nominal besar membuat permainan sulit, setiap kekalahan setelah menaikkan taruhan terasa seperti pembenaran. Hasil berbeda sering justru terlupakan.

Situs Slot Maxwin Perlu Memisahkan Fakta Sistem dari Persepsi

Transparansi menjadi bagian penting ketika sebuah platform menyajikan informasi permainan. Situs Slot Maxwin idealnya memberikan akses jelas terhadap aturan, tabel pembayaran, batas taruhan, fitur khusus, serta informasi RTP apabila tersedia dari provider. Informasi tersebut jauh lebih berguna dibanding klaim mengenai nominal tertentu sebagai angka “aman”, “panas”, atau dianggap mampu membuka peluang khusus. Tanpa data teknis dari pengembang, klaim semacam itu tidak cukup kuat untuk dijadikan kesimpulan.

Nominal Situs Slot Maxwin pada akhirnya lebih tepat dipahami sebagai pengaturan nilai finansial per putaran. Besar atau kecilnya angka dapat mengubah kecepatan perubahan saldo dan persepsi risiko, tetapi tidak otomatis menjadi tombol rahasia untuk menaikkan atau menurunkan tingkat kesulitan.

Algoritma Slot Maxwin tetap perlu dibaca melalui mekanisme game, RNG, volatilitas, paytable, fitur khusus, serta parameter dari provider. Memisahkan unsur tersebut membantu pengguna melihat perbedaan antara sistem matematika dan pola semu hasil pengalaman singkat. Dengan begitu, nominal tidak lagi dianggap sebagai bukti bahwa algoritma diam-diam berubah setiap kali angka taruhan dinaikkan.

With less than a year to go before France’s presidential election, far-right candidate Marine Le Pen seems almost certain to reach the run-off. Her party’s fortunes have continued to rise in recent years thanks to its leaders’ ability to rally working-class voters while securing support from business elites. Tensions between these two bases remain, but they are unlikely to come to a head before the vote.

Marine Le Pen is no stranger to strategic ambiguity. She has existed in this state for the past year, promoting Jordan Bardella as a potential presidential candidate for the Rassemblement National (RN) in 2027, but not ruling out running herself if the courts decided to reduce her sentence for embezzlement of public funds.

In July, her sentence was reduced to three years in prison, two suspended, one under house arrest. Her ineligibility for public office was cut to 15 months. Because she had already served this since the first verdict, her path to the presidency reopened, and she immediately threw her hat back into the ring.

Le Pen has already launched an appeal against the new sentence too, at the Cour de Cassation, France’s supreme court. Depending on when this judgement is delivered, she may have to face an ignominious end to the election campaign, spending the last few days wearing an electronic ankle tag and under curfew. If she is lucky, however, the sluggish timeline of French justice may spare her a verdict until after the second round, by which point she hopes to have presidential immunity.

Candidate, or perhaps not. Ankle tag, or perhaps not. The uncertainty of the French justice system is not where the ambiguity ends either: Le Pen’s bid for the Élysée Palace rests on her ability to maintain unity between different fractions of her base that have competing interests.

A short-lived social turn

When Le Pen achieved her first major breakthrough, advancing to the second round of the presidential election in 2017, she did so off the back of a “social turn”. Advised by Florian Philippot, then vice-president of the Front National (now RN), she ran on a platform of retirement at 60, scrapping the 2016 labour reform which restricted workers’ rights, fighting against tax evasion, and maintaining the 35-hour work week and the wealth tax, amid a host of other statist measures.

Ten years on, […] Le Pen has dropped her social commitments as opportunistically as she initially picked them up.

During the campaign, she attacked Le Siècle, an elite cross-partisan social club that she described as a secret meeting point of the oligarchy. She borrowed the slogans of populist left-winger Jean-Luc Mélenchon to appeal to his voters in the second round, calling them to “dégagez-les” (“throw them out”), a direct echo of his call to “dégagez-les tous” (“throw them all out”). She even quoted the Socialist leader of the early 20th century, Jean-Jaurès, but it was to no avail. She had spent the 2017 campaign talking up the benefits of euro-exit and Frexit, which business and 70 per cent of the French public strongly opposed. At the last minute, she tried to backpedal but failed to convince the electorate. Her campaign ended with a bruising debate against Emmanuel Macron in which she appeared not to understand her own economic policies.

Ten years on, little remains of that Marine Le Pen. As part of the de-demonisation strategy of rendering the RN palatable, she has dropped her social commitments as opportunistically as she initially picked them up.

Unlike in the US or the UK, companies in France cannot donate to political campaigns, and donations from private citizens are capped at 7,500 euros. Industry thus doesn’t intervene as directly in the democratic process as the cryptocurrency and fossil fuels interests backing Donald Trump and Nigel Farage. Similarly, because of the RN’s ties to historical fascism, business has previously been wary of being seen to associate with the party, to the point that the Front National couldn’t even access French bank loans.

Nonetheless, since 2024, when the Rassemblement National became the largest individual party in both the European Parliament and the French National Assembly, the RN and big business have gradually moved closer. This has been in no small part thanks to Jordan Bardella, the young gun who would have replaced Le Pen if the courts had rejected her appeal. Bardella, who is just 30 years old and currently dating an aristocrat, believes the RN needs to expand beyond its working-class and struggling petit-bourgeois base into the affluent classes. He sees austerity as a core part of the RN’s project: in 2024, he proclaimed the need for “order in the streets and order in the public accounts”.

Party of capital

Two additional factors have enabled the RN to become a standard party of capital: support from oligarchs, and an attempt by centrists to paint the Left as the real extremists, letting the RN off the hook.

Media moguls Vincent Bolloré and Pierre Édouard Stérin relentlessly platform the party and talk up its preferred themes in the media (although they also boost other right-wing forces, like Éric Zemmour’s party Reconquête, various other Catholic reactionaries, and what remains of the Sarkozyist right). François Durvye, a former hedge fund manager for Stérin and a special advisor to Bardella, was tasked with establishing relationships with the business elite. Durvye recently quit the party, but in a parting shot, he claimed he was unable to reconcile himself to Le Pen’s insufficiently neoliberal positions. In reality, reporting in Libération and Mediapart suggests that his departure was largely an ego-driven firing by Le Pen, who made clear that his days were numbered after he had unsubtly expressed his dissatisfaction to various RN bigwigs that she – and not Bardella – was running for president. This was not an ideological purge. Bardella, and his other economically liberal advisors like Ambroise de Rancourt, remain part of Le Pen’s campaign team. On 29 August, the party announced that, if it gained power, it would enshrine a “golden rule” of keeping the deficit below 3 per cent in the constitution.

Durvye and Bardella’s strenuous efforts to sign up to the agenda of the patronat – France’s business establishment – appear to be working. In 2011, Laurence Parisot, then head of the business lobby MEDEF, denounced Le Pen, accusing her of sitting squarely within the far-right tradition. By 2025, Bardella was a guest at the MEDEF summer university, keen to demonstrate that the party was abandoning any statist economic policies it may have previously favoured. In 2026, he was invited back for a working lunch, which he later described as “courteous”. The rapprochement extends to Le Pen herself: In April, she dined with influential corporate leaders including France’s richest man, Bernard Arnault, the owner of luxury goods firm LVMH, who backed Macron in 2017 and 2022 and is a personal friend of Vincent Bolloré.

The institutions representing business interests are taking the RN seriously because the polls currently show Le Pen/Bardella making it into the second round in all scenarios, and likely beating their opponent in the runoff. Business leaders feel they have to suss out the potential next party of government. They also fear the alternative: though centrist candidates seem to stand a better chance of making it to the second round, some polling scenarios show the RN candidate facing off against Mélenchon, who is himself running for the fourth time.

The centrist parties have already supplied the arguments for business to back the far right, treating Mélenchon and his party La France Insoumise (“France Unbowed”, LFI) as an equivalent “extreme” to the RN, while also slowly turning the framework of demonisation away from the RN and onto LFI. In 2024, the newspaper Libération revealed secret dinners between Édouard Philippe, the likely candidate of the Macron camp, and Marine Le Pen. At one of these dinners, Philippe reportedly said that he wanted the next election to be between his camp and the far right; an election of “project against project, without moral critique”, according to the revelations. Last year, Bruno Retailleau, head of the right-wing Les Républicains party and former interior minister under Macron, called for a united “republican front” including the RN against LFI. Most of the attacks from the Macron camp on the RN have thus far concentrated on the party’s economic irresponsibility, based often on the promises they made during their brief social turn.

In this context, business has little work to do to abandon republicanism and justify a swing behind the RN. In the 2026 Toulouse municipal election, local industrial leaders threatened to cancel investments or to pull their businesses from the city if LFI candidate François Piquemal beat Macronist Jean-Luc Moudenc. Business and industrial leaders are primed to take this one step further and come out against LFI in future LFI-RN runoffs. As Bernard Cohen, the head of a lobby group representing the interests of small- and medium-sized businesses put it recently: “whether they are small, medium or large, what the bosses like generally is financial and economic stability […] economic danger for the bosses comes not from the Left of government, but a certain section of the Left; by which they mean LFI”.

For their part, the unions, or at least the more radical ones, have started to push back against the bosses creeping toward the RN. In August, Sophie Binet, the leader of the CGT, denounced MEDEF in an interview with Le Monde for helping roll out the red carpet to the far right. She argued that the party’s economic position was irrelevant and that business leaders should be thinking about the RN’s programme regarding women, LGBT rights, climate change, the constitution, and the independence of the judiciary, rather than any economic reforms that the bosses might favour.

The standard position across the unions is that the far right is a unique and dangerous threat to the republic, to which any other political force is preferable. The Nouveau Front Populaire (New Popular Front; a broad left-wing electoral alliance in France) was endorsed in 2024 because it was a rare instance of left unity. In other words, the unions wouldn’t burn any bridges by backing it. In 2024, the leaderships of various unions condemned media outlets and politicians trying to invoke a false equivalence between LFI and the far right, but they prefer to remain relatively politically neutral, not least because the leadership of LFI and union leaders have butted heads over strategy many times.

Kicking the can

The RN’s move closer to its roots on the economy poses problems for the coalition that it is trying to build over the long term. The party has no meaningful answer to how it reconciles the interests of its working-class and petit-bourgeois voters with those of the oligarchs that now back it.

For example, the RN has been keen to position itself as the party of French agriculture, and has allied closely with small farmers who smile in selfies with Bardella. These traditionalist farmers are the kinds of people who oppose the over-financialisation of agriculture and the mass purchase of land by agri-giants like Otium, owned by Pierre Edouard Stérin, one of the oligarchs instrumental in smoothing the party’s path to power. When iron and steel colossus ArcelorMittal entered crisis due to global overcapacity, the company closed two sites and said it would cut a further 600 jobs. The RN attacked Macron incessantly, but when LFI proposed a vote on nationalising the firm, it abstained, fearing it would alienate business.

The party has also opposed wealth taxes as well as taxes on private jets. It promises a better life for workers through horizontal redistribution away from immigrants, welfare cheats, the recipients of overseas development aid, and a very optimistic assessment of government waste. It also proposes cutting France’s contributions to the EU, which could ultimately result in reduced subsidies for its agricultural base. In the RN’s 2026 counter-budget, the party put forward proposals for deeper austerity than the Macronist government, arguing for 36 billion euros in savings compared to prime minister Sébastien Lecornu’s 30 billion. In short, the RN is back to the ultra-racist Reaganism that defined the party under Jean-Marie Le Pen, Marine’s father.

The party has no meaningful answer to how it reconciles the interests of its working-class and petit-bourgeois voters with those of the oligarchs that now back it.

To obviate the conflict between the interests the RN is trying to represent, Marine Le Pen defaults to unity through nationalism. She talks in the language of the people and presents the struggle as a national one against a cosmopolitan establishment. As political scientist Théo Bourgeron has observed, Le Pen kicks down the road the difficult spending tradeoffs that will arise when not enough government waste is found to cover what remains of the party’s social commitments.

Where there is a genuine tension in the strategy is Le Pen’s disagreement with Bardella (and previously Durvye) over pensions. Bardella used the period when he was the likely presidential candidate to argue against Le Pen’s position on the subject. Fearful of alienating the party’s older working-class base, she wants to roll back Macron’s pension reforms and revert the retirement age to 62. Bardella, by contrast, wants to keep the reform and is even considering scrapping a rule that allows people to retire at 67 on full pension, aiming to replace it instead with a minimum of 42 years of contribution, or the option to take a smaller pension. While it does open the party up to accusations of abandoning its base, even this tension could work in the RN’s benefit. Candidate once more, Le Pen can set the line in favour of the lower pension age, while Bardella privately reassures his newfound friends in MEDEF that he will do his utmost to lobby for a higher one when in power.

Maintaining the coalition

For the moment, this tension seems unlikely to pose too many problems for the RN. The far right does not have a monopoly on the working class, most of whom choose abstention, and many of whom vote for left-wing parties. It is true, however, that the voters they do have, including those among the working class, are unlikely to be fazed by the imprecision on economic questions and the cosiness with big business. Félicien Faury’s Des électeurs ordinaires (“Ordinary Voters”), a study of the RN electorate, has demonstrated the importance of race and identity to the far-right vote. He has amassed ample evidence that RN voters tend to feel that the distributional conflicts in society are almost entirely between natives and immigrants, not between social classes, and that they generally share the low-tax impulses of the Grand Patrons – France’s most influential corporate bosses.

The contradictions of the RN aren’t likely to be confronted on the ground or in the media. Although LFI speaks in the language of class conflict and is committed to highlighting RN hypocrisy, Mélenchon’s strategy is to assemble a “New France” of public sector workers, educated young people, and the urban, often racialised working class. This means that they will spend limited time and resources during the campaign in the working-class areas where the far right is strongest, because their strategy is not premised on converting far-right voters, but on building an alternative coalition by activating abstentionists to reach the second round.

There is a certain logic to Mélenchon’s gamble. Abstentionists are sociologically closer to left-wing voters, and have values that more closely resemble those of the left bloc than those of the centre or the far right. The French presidential election accounts only for raw numbers, not the geographic distribution of voters, so there is a lot to be gained for a Left concentrated primarily on winning votes in densely populated urban areas.

Polling hypotheticals show Mélenchon, currently the only left candidate with a plausible shot of making it to the second round, being destroyed by both Le Pen and Bardella in a runoff. To this, the Insoumis retort that polls always underestimate Mélenchon and overrate Le Pen. They argue that the extra votes from the abstentionists they hope to activate can be combined with the same dynamic that made the New Popular Front, a broad left-wing electoral alliance, win the legislative elections in 2024 (albeit without a majority), when enough centrist voters chose to block the far right.

Mélenchon’s candidacy remains a long shot, though his campaign is progressing well. The far right’s unity is currently being held in place by proximity to power. Commonalities are emphasised and differences dissolved by the possibility that Marine Le Pen might soon be in the Élysée. If Mélenchon wins, the factions will compete to establish the post-Le Pen orientation of the far-right bloc. If she (or a candidate of post-Macronism) wins, then the reverse occurs: the Left will be scrambled, and the succession battle will play out among the interest groups and political tendencies to the left of Macron. For now, the far right’s contradictions are likely to remain unresolved.

Nama sebuah game bisa bertahan lama bukan cuma karena fitur di dalamnya. Karakter kuat, simbol khas, ritme permainan, sampai konsep visual ikut membentuk identitas hingga mudah dikenali. Pola Slot Maxwin kini berada di tengah perubahan tersebut, saat pemain mulai memperhatikan kombinasi mekanisme serta tema populer sebagai pembeda antarjudul.

Kondisi ini membuat istilah game ikonik memiliki arti lebih luas. Sebuah permainan tidak harus rumit untuk mendapatkan perhatian. Justru konsep sederhana dengan ciri visual konsisten sering lebih mudah melekat. Dari mitologi, dunia oriental, permen, petualangan, sampai karakter unik, setiap tema membawa pendekatan berbeda dalam membangun pengalaman.

Pola Slot Maxwin Mulai Identik dengan Karakter Game

Pola Slot Maxwin tidak hanya dibicarakan melalui susunan simbol atau fitur tertentu. Istilah tersebut juga sering dipakai komunitas untuk menggambarkan karakter sebuah permainan, mulai dari tempo, struktur fitur, volatilitas, hingga cara bonus muncul. Setiap game memiliki sistem internal masing-masing. Karena itu, kemiripan tampilan tidak berarti dua permainan memakai mekanisme identik. Pola pembayaran, jumlah gulungan, fitur tambahan, serta struktur bonus dapat menciptakan pengalaman berbeda meski keduanya membawa tema serupa.

Sudut pandang ini penting agar pembahasan pola tidak berubah menjadi klaim kepastian hasil. Pola Slot Maxwin lebih tepat dibaca sebagai cara pengguna mengenali karakter permainan, bukan formula untuk menjamin hasil tertentu.

Game Ikonik Memiliki Identitas Mudah Diingat

Game ikonik biasanya mempunyai satu atau beberapa elemen pembeda. Ada judul terkenal karena karakter utama, ada pula permainan populer berkat simbol khas, desain bonus, atau atmosfernya. Identitas semacam ini membantu sebuah game bertahan di tengah katalog besar. Pemain dapat mengenalinya hanya melalui thumbnail, karakter, atau potongan tampilan. Efeknya mirip identitas visual pada produk digital lain: semakin konsisten cirinya, semakin mudah nama tersebut tersimpan dalam ingatan.

Tema Populer Membentuk Generasi Game Baru

Tema populer terus bergerak mengikuti selera pasar. Mitologi masih mempunyai ruang besar, tetapi kini berdampingan dengan konsep oriental, fantasi, budaya pop, makanan, petualangan, sampai dunia futuristik. Perubahan tersebut memperluas cara pengembang membangun pengalaman. Tema tidak berhenti pada background. Musik, simbol, karakter, efek transisi, serta desain fitur dapat mengikuti satu konsep serupa sehingga permainan terasa memiliki dunia sendiri. Pada titik ini, tema populer bekerja sebagai pintu masuk. Pengguna dapat tertarik lewat tampilan lebih dulu, kemudian mempelajari fitur setelah membuka permainan.

Mitologi dan Oriental Tetap Mudah Dikenali

Dewa, petir, kuil, naga, koin emas, serta ornamen Asia mempunyai karakter visual kuat. Elemen tersebut dapat dipahami dalam waktu singkat tanpa membutuhkan penjelasan panjang. Tema mitologi cenderung membawa atmosfer dramatis. Sebaliknya, konsep oriental sering menggunakan simbol keberuntungan, warna kontras, serta ilustrasi tradisional dengan sentuhan modern. Keduanya mampu melahirkan game ikonik karena memiliki bahasa visual jelas. Namun popularitas tema tetap tidak menentukan peluang hasil. Aspek visual dan sistem permainan merupakan dua lapisan berbeda.

Pola Slot Maxwin Dengan Game Ikonik Memadukan Familiaritas

Ada alasan mengapa konsep lama terus muncul dalam bentuk baru. Familiaritas mempermudah pengguna memahami tampilan sejak sesi pertama. Pengembang kemudian menambahkan variasi mekanisme supaya pengalaman tidak terasa seperti salinan judul sebelumnya. Pola Slot Maxwin Dengan Game Ikonik dapat terlihat melalui kombinasi tersebut. Simbol familiar dipertemukan dengan animasi baru, fitur interaktif, struktur reel berbeda, atau presentasi bonus lebih ekspresif. Pendekatan ini juga menjelaskan mengapa beberapa judul cepat mendapat perhatian. Pengguna memperoleh sesuatu untuk dikenali sekaligus unsur baru untuk dipelajari.

Mekanisme Tetap Menjadi Pembeda Utama

Dua game bertema sama belum tentu memberikan pengalaman serupa. Perbedaan jumlah baris, sistem pembayaran, simbol khusus, multiplier, free spin, atau fitur bonus bisa mengubah ritme secara signifikan. Karena itu, membaca informasi permainan tetap lebih berguna daripada hanya mengikuti tema. Paytable, aturan fitur, informasi volatilitas jika tersedia, serta penjelasan simbol memberi konteks lebih konkret mengenai cara sebuah judul bekerja. Pendekatan tersebut membuat pembahasan Pola Slot Maxwin lebih informatif. Fokus tidak berhenti pada istilah populer, tetapi masuk ke struktur permainan secara nyata.

Game Ikonik Tidak Selalu Berasal dari Konsep Rumit

Kesederhanaan justru dapat menjadi kekuatan. Desain bersih, simbol mudah dibedakan, serta fitur dengan aturan singkat membuat pengguna lebih cepat memahami alur permainan. Game ikonik sering lahir dari kombinasi sederhana: karakter kuat, tema konsisten, mekanisme mudah dikenali, lalu ditambah satu ciri khas. Formula desain semacam ini membuat sebuah judul mempunyai identitas tanpa perlu memenuhi layar dengan terlalu banyak elemen.

Pola Slot Maxwin Bergerak Bersama Tren Tema

Perubahan tema memperlihatkan bahwa industri permainan digital terus mencari cara baru untuk mempertahankan perhatian pengguna. Pola Slot Maxwin ikut berkembang dalam percakapan tersebut karena istilah ini kini bersinggungan dengan mekanisme, visual, karakter, serta popularitas sebuah game. Game ikonik memberi unsur familiar, sementara tema populer membawa variasi baru. Ketika keduanya dipadukan secara tepat, sebuah permainan memiliki peluang lebih besar untuk mudah dikenali di antara banyak pilihan.

Namun identitas populer tetap perlu dipisahkan dari anggapan soal hasil. Tema, karakter, atau pola visual tidak memberikan jaminan kemenangan. Nilai utamanya terletak pada cara sebuah game membangun ciri khas, menjelaskan mekanisme, serta menciptakan pengalaman berbeda dari judul lain.

Headline News:

• “Von Der Leyen Tries To Counter Trump With €200 Million Investment In Greenland” • Ursula von der Leyen unveiled a €200 million investment package to back Greenland’s territorial integrity and counter pressure from US President Trump, who has repeatedly threatened to annex the mineral-rich island. The funds will arrive over the next two years. [Euronews]

Nuuk (Quintin Soloviev, CC BY-SA 4.0, cropped)

• “Nepal Holds A Day Of Mourning For Flash Floods Victims, As Rescue Efforts Continue” • Nepal held a day of mourning for the 1,300 known dead in the floods of August 26. Government offices lowered flags and family members carryed out mourning rituals. Rescue efforts are focused on twelve hydropower projects, where about 500 workers may still be trapped. [Euronews]
• “ICCT Says EV Operating Costs Are A Third Lower In Europe” • The International Council On Clean Transportation said in a report that in 2025 operating an electric car in Europe cost one third less than operating a car powered by internal combustion. With higher fuel costs after the US attack on Iran, the disparity could be greater in 2026. [CleanTechnica]
• “Russia Destroys Solar Plants, But Ukrainian Businesses Continue Investing Millions In Green Energy.” • Russian attacks continue to damage Ukraine’s renewable energy infrastructure. Nevertheless, Ukrainian businesses and banks are still moving ahead with millions of euros in new solar and energy storage investments. [Ukraine Business News]
• “Even More Questions Swirl Around Tesla Cybercab Rollout” • When Tesla unveiled its Cybercab robotaxi in Austin, there was a lot of media buzz. However, it seems that a lot of that buzz was the sound of heads being scratched. One of the questions being asked: How many, if any, fleet managers will stock their robotaxi fleets with Cybercabs? [CleanTechnica]

For more news, please visit geoharvey – Daily News about Energy and Climate Change.

Nama provider sekarang menjadi salah satu informasi pertama saat pengguna membandingkan permainan slot digital. Bukan cuma soal katalog atau popularitas merek, tiap pengembang membawa pendekatan berbeda pada mekanisme, desain antarmuka, tempo permainan, fitur bonus, sampai karakter visual. Perbedaan tersebut membuat provider populer memiliki identitas sendiri di tengah katalog Royalgacor Slot Masa Kini.

Situs Royalgacor dapat menjadi ruang untuk melihat perbedaan tersebut secara lebih terstruktur. Alih-alih menempatkan seluruh permainan dalam kelompok serupa, katalog berdasarkan provider membantu pengguna memahami ciri setiap pengembang. Pragmatic Play, PG Soft, Spadegaming, Joker Gaming, hingga Microgaming memiliki pendekatan tersendiri. Perbandingan akhirnya bergeser dari sekadar mencari nama populer menuju pemahaman tentang gaya permainan.

Royalgacor Provider Populer Memiliki Karakter Berbeda

Popularitas sebuah provider tidak muncul hanya karena jumlah permainan. Konsistensi produk ikut membentuk cara pengguna mengenali suatu studio. Ada pengembang dengan ciri visual kuat, sementara lainnya lebih menonjol melalui mekanisme sederhana atau format permainan ramah perangkat seluler. Royalgacor Provider Populer dapat dikelompokkan berdasarkan karakter tersebut. Cara ini membuat katalog lebih mudah dipahami sekaligus membantu pengguna membedakan permainan tanpa perlu membuka setiap judul satu per satu.

Pragmatic Play Identik dengan Presentasi Dramatis

Pragmatic Play cukup mudah dikenali melalui karakter besar, efek visual ekspresif, serta fitur bonus dengan presentasi mencolok. Gates of Olympus dan Starlight Princess menjadi contoh bagaimana karakter utama dapat berfungsi sebagai identitas sebuah permainan. Pendekatan tersebut membuat produknya terasa kuat dari sisi branding. Pada Royalgacor slot, permainan semacam ini dapat ditempatkan dalam kategori bertema mitologi, karakter ikonik, atau fitur interaktif agar pencarian terasa lebih relevan.

PG Soft Membawa Pendekatan Mobile-First

PG Soft mengambil jalur berbeda. Banyak produknya menggunakan komposisi vertikal, animasi halus, karakter bergaya ilustratif, serta navigasi ringkas. Pendekatan ini cocok dengan kebiasaan pengguna smartphone. Mahjong Ways menjadi salah satu contoh bagaimana tema budaya, simbol, efek transisi, serta mekanisme permainan dapat dirangkai dalam tampilan relatif padat. Dalam perbandingan Royalgacor Slot Masa Kini, PG Soft memiliki posisi kuat pada aspek pengalaman mobile dan identitas visual.

Spadegaming Menawarkan Nuansa Asia Lebih Kental

Spadegaming membawa banyak elemen bernuansa Asia melalui karakter, ornamen, warna, sampai tema cerita. Ciri tersebut membuat katalognya mempunyai identitas berbeda dibanding provider dengan konsep fantasi Barat atau mitologi Eropa. Bagi Situs Royalgacor, perbedaan seperti ini berguna untuk membangun kategori berdasarkan preferensi visual. Pengguna bisa menemukan permainan melalui tema terlebih dahulu sebelum membaca mekanisme, tabel pembayaran, atau fitur khusus.

Joker Gaming Mempertahankan Format Lebih Familiar

Di tengah permainan modern penuh animasi, format sederhana masih mempunyai ruang. Joker Gaming dikenal melalui sejumlah permainan dengan struktur visual relatif mudah dikenali serta navigasi tidak terlalu kompleks. Karakter tersebut menarik untuk dibandingkan dengan provider generasi baru. Royalgacor Provider Populer akhirnya tidak harus diukur melalui kemewahan grafis. Kemudahan membaca simbol, menu, aturan, serta informasi fitur juga menentukan kualitas pengalaman pengguna.

Microgaming Menjadi Pembanding dari Generasi Lebih Lama

Microgaming memiliki sejarah panjang dalam industri permainan digital. Karena itu, portofolionya dapat menjadi pembanding saat melihat perubahan desain slot dari masa ke masa. Perbedaan generasi terlihat pada struktur layar, animasi, karakter, serta cara fitur diperkenalkan. Permainan lama cenderung mengandalkan susunan simbol lebih konvensional. Produk masa kini bergerak menuju presentasi interaktif dengan transisi cepat serta fitur berlapis. Royalgacor Slot Masa Kini dapat memanfaatkan perbedaan tersebut sebagai bentuk pengelompokan katalog. Pengguna tidak hanya melihat permainan berdasarkan urutan rilis, tetapi juga perkembangan konsep dari satu generasi menuju generasi berikutnya.

Perbandingan Provider Tidak Cukup Berdasarkan Popularitas

Jumlah pemain atau ketenaran sebuah judul hanya memberikan sebagian gambaran. Perbandingan lebih relevan perlu melihat beberapa aspek sekaligus, mulai dari desain mobile, keterbacaan informasi, variasi tema, struktur fitur, hingga konsistensi antarmuka. Situs Royalgacor juga perlu memberi konteks mengenai aturan dasar setiap permainan. Provider berbeda dapat menggunakan istilah, simbol khusus, format bonus, serta sistem pembayaran berbeda. Informasi tersebut membantu pengguna memahami produk tanpa bergantung pada klaim seperti “lebih mudah menang” atau “pasti memberi hasil besar”, sebab hasil permainan tidak dapat dinilai hanya dari nama pengembang.

Royalgacor Slot Masa Kini Menunjukkan Arah Industri Lebih Beragam

Persaingan provider sekarang bukan lagi sekadar perlombaan memperbanyak judul. Pragmatic Play membawa presentasi dramatis, PG Soft kuat pada pengalaman mobile, Spadegaming memiliki identitas Asia, Joker Gaming mempertahankan format familiar, sedangkan Microgaming memberikan gambaran evolusi dari generasi terdahulu. Royalgacor Provider Populer dapat memperlihatkan perbedaan tersebut melalui katalog terstruktur. Pengelompokan berdasarkan studio, tema, mekanisme, serta karakter visual memberi nilai lebih dibanding daftar permainan tanpa konteks. Pada akhirnya, Royalgacor slot dapat menjadi tempat untuk membaca perubahan selera pasar secara lebih luas. Provider terus mencari identitas agar produknya tidak tenggelam di antara ratusan pilihan. Bagi Royalgacor Slot Masa Kini, justru perbedaan itulah bagian paling menarik untuk dibandingkan: bukan siapa paling ramai dibicarakan, melainkan bagaimana setiap pengembang membangun pengalaman permainan dengan pendekatan berbeda.

El Seminario internacional basura cero reunió en Chile a representantes de 26 municipalidades y 45 organizaciones de más de 15 países para abordar el potencial de los residuos orgánicos en la reducción de emisiones de metano y la transición hacia modelos de basura cero.

Conversatorio: Cómo dialoga el contexto legal actual con la estrategia basura cero.

Septiembre de 2026—  La gestión de residuos debe dejar de ser entendida únicamente como un problema sanitario y convertirse en una prioridad de la acción climática. Ese fue uno de los principales mensajes del “Seminario internacional basura cero: el rol estratégico de los residuos orgánicos para la acción climática y la democratización de soluciones”, organizado por GAIA, Break Free From Plastic (BFFP) y la Alianza Basura Cero Chile.

El encuentro reunió a 50 representantes de más de 26 municipalidades de Chile, 45 organizaciones provenientes de más de 15 países de América Latina y el Caribe, representantes del sector gubernamental, recicladores de base y académicos, quienes compartieron experiencias sobre políticas públicas, compostaje, reciclaje, reparación y gestión local de residuos.

El metano estuvo en el centro de la discusión. Marcelo Mena, director ejecutivo de Global Methane Hub, destacó que “si bajamos la emisión de metano, la disminución de la temperatura sería prácticamente inmediata”, y planteó que reducir los residuos orgánicos es una de las medidas más eficaces y rentables para avanzar en esta dirección.

Juan Pablo Escudero, investigador del Instituto Emmett de la UCLA, destacó el aporte de las nuevas tecnologías para identificar las fuentes de metano. “La gran acción climática no consiste únicamente en dejar de quemar petróleo. Hay que mirar a la basura”, afirmó.

Conferencia inaugural de Marcelo Mena, Director Ejecutivo Global Methane Hub. Residuos orgánicos: de problema a recurso

Durante el seminario se abordó especialmente el potencial de los residuos orgánicos para producir compost, regenerar suelos y reducir emisiones.

Mariela Pino, campañista en mitigación de metano para GAIA LAC, señaló que “la gestión de residuos ya no es solo una cuestión sanitaria” y que su relación con el cambio climático exige una aproximación distinta. Pino planteó que avanzar hacia basura cero requiere maximizar el reciclaje de materiales orgánicos e inorgánicos, implementar sistemas de recolección diferenciada y separación en origen, y asegurar un financiamiento adecuado.

También destacó la importancia de vincular la gestión de residuos con la protección de los suelos y la producción de alimentos: “Tenemos que ver los residuos no solo como algo sanitario, sino como parte de una economía socioambiental que genera buenos beneficios”, sostuvo.

Las experiencias presentadas mostraron que estas soluciones ya están siendo implementadas. En el municipio Quinta Normal de Chile, por ejemplo, se desarrolla un programa piloto de reciclaje orgánico en ferias libres, mientras que en Melipeuco el municipio trabaja desde 2021 en una estrategia local de basura cero junto a las comunidades.

En tanto, Fértil Compostaje, una empresa familiar campesina de La Araucanía chilena, procesa entre 20 y 30 toneladas de residuos de la industria agrícola para producir compost. Su responsable, Germán Jara, advirtió sobre el deterioro de los suelos agrícolas y afirmó: “No estamos enterrando basura, estamos enterrando la solución para regenerar nuestros suelos”.

Asistentes al seminario en el Aula Magna de la Universidad Católica de Chile. Una transición que debe incluir a los recicladores

El rol de los recicladores de base fue otro de los ejes del encuentro. Soledad Mella, de la Asociación Nacional de Recicladores de Chile, llamó a que la transición hacia sistemas de basura cero incorpore a quienes históricamente han sostenido la recuperación de materiales. “La transición justa no es mover residuos de lugar: es mover poder, inversión y oportunidades hacia quienes sostienen el reciclaje”, afirmó.

Desde Brasil, Roselaine Mendes, secretaria internacional de la Red Latinoamericana y del caribe de Recicladores (RedLacre), destacó la importancia de reconocer económicamente el trabajo de los recicladores. “Solo vivir de la venta de los materiales no es sostenible. Es necesario que recibamos el pago por nuestro trabajo”, señaló.

El seminario también abordó los avances y desafíos de las políticas públicas chilenas, incluyendo la Ley de Responsabilidad Extendida del Productor (REP), la infraestructura para la gestión de residuos orgánicos, la educación ciudadana y la coordinación entre gobiernos nacionales, regionales y municipales.

Magdalena Donoso, coordinadora regional de GAIA y BFFP en América Latina.

Para Magdalena Donoso, coordinadora regional de GAIA y BFFP en Latinoamérica y el Caribe, los avances alcanzados son resultado de la organización y perseverancia de diversos actores. “Las agendas se mueven cuando las voluntades irreductibles deciden organizarse y actuar antes de que el éxito parezca posible, y perseveran porque se niegan a aceptar que aquello que no tiene sentido se siga perpetuando”, afirmó.

El encuentro concluyó con un llamado a fortalecer la colaboración entre gobiernos, municipios, organizaciones sociales, recicladores, comunidades, academia y sector privado para acelerar soluciones locales que permitan reducir emisiones, prevenir residuos y avanzar hacia sistemas de basura cero.

Contactos de prensa: 

Camila Aguilera, GAIA, camila@no-burn.org  | +56 9 8913 6198

María Fernanda Pérez R., BFFP, mafe@breakfreefromplastic.org | +58 424 210 8017

The post Organizaciones, sector gubernamental y recicladores de base llaman a acelerar la gestión de residuos como estrategia frente al cambio climático first appeared on GAIA.

SEC says Queensland state government has deliberate policy to make renewable uninvestable, by scrapping targets, boosting coal and fighting data centres rules.

The post “It’s an ideology:” Queensland LNP accused of deliberate strategy to kill large scale renewables appeared first on Renew Economy.

Smart Energy Council calls for a carbon price to be imposed on coal fired power plants that continue to generate beyond their previously agreed closure dates.

The post Renewables lobby says coal generators should pay carbon price to stay open beyond stated closure dates appeared first on Renew Economy.

A relatively ambitious deal to reduce the shipping industry’s 3% of global emissions now looks more likely after four days of closed-door talks in London, observers say.

The International Maritime Organization (IMO), which oversees the negotiations, said there had been “constructive discussions” and “genuine willingness within the group to make concrete further progress”.

Em Fenton, senior director at the NGO Opportunity Green who attended the talks last week, said they “demonstrated a strong spirit of solidarity in the face of blatant attempts to undermine the credibility, ambition and equity of a hard-fought multilateral agreement”.

After several years of debate, governments provisionally agreed in April 2025 on a “Net-Zero Framework” (NZF) – a series of emissions reduction targets for shipowners aimed at incentivising them to use cleaner fuels, backed up with financial rewards for meeting the targets and fees for missing them.

But in October 2025, after a high-profile intervention by US President Donald Trump and threats of US sanctions and visa restrictions, the US convinced a majority of voting nations to postpone the adoption of the NZF for a year.

UCL analysis found that, of those who expressed a view at last week’s talks, 38 were in favour of an NZF-style solution while only 17 were against. Those opposed are “consistently composed of strongly fossil fuel-aligned governments”.

An observer of the talks, who did not want to be named, said the countries opposed include the US, Russia, India, Thailand, Argentina, Ecuador and Uruguay, as well as eight oil-rich Gulf nations and shipowner-reliant Liberia and Panama. Governments that support an NZF-style deal include China, Brazil, Mexico, Türkiye, Canada, Australia, Chile, nine African nations, most European countries and small islands.

A new framework to tackle shipping emissions could be adopted if two-thirds of countries that are present and signed up to a regulation called Marpol Annex VI – endorsed by just over 100 states – vote in favour of it, as they did in April 2025.

UCL’s analysis said it was “reassuring” that governments which had taken strong positions in the media against the NZF were being more compromising in the negotiations.

Tweaks are probable

While there is majority support for the NZF, UCL said adopting it would be difficult politically. “The process from here could therefore be as much about producing what appears to be a new package, but one that broadly ends up with similar outcomes in relation to objectives,” UCL argued.

But tweaking the NZF, which resulted from years of negotiations, comes with risks, it warned. For example, changes could reduce the new system’s planned support for low-income countries, turning them against it. Fenton said compromising should not mean “abandoning the principle of justice in the maritime transition”.

UCL said the speed at which shipowners must reduce their ships’ emissions or face fees is likely to be reduced in the short-term but raised in the long-term to meet a goal of net zero emissions by mid-century.

• Sep 4, 2026 Justice Palestine: Israel’s bombing has left Gaza vulnerable to climate change With homes, hospitals and water storage destroyed, Palestine’s government says that Gazans have little protection from climate impacts and sets conditional emissions targets Read more
• Sep 3, 2026 Energy More support needed to power Africa’s food systems with renewables, experts say Renewable energy could help African food businesses boost productivity and competitiveness, but the upfront cost, fragmented markets and limited financing stand in the way Read more
• Sep 2, 2026 Finance Loss and damage fund urged to hold crisis meeting on Nepal The new fund is coming under pressure from developing nations to respond quickly to climate disasters rather than just financing longer-term projects Read more

This was a compromise put forward by NZF-supporter Brazil. However, an analysis by the the Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and Technology (IMarEST) has found that this change would lead to more overall emissions than the original NZF trajectory.

UCL has warned it could incentivise liquefied natural gas as a shipping fuel over greener options, which include hydrogen-based methanol and ammonia.

Analysis by UCL and the Rocky Mountain Institute suggests that, while a slower start to the NZF would reduce transport costs in the short term, it would increase them later due to the costs involved in switching the industry over from more polluting fuel to cleaner fuel.

NZF won’t meet emissions goals

IMarEst’s analysis finds that even in its current form – the most ambitious deal on the table – the NZF will not be sufficient for shipping to meet its emissions reduction goals.

It says that only a Pacific proposal to place a levy on ships’ total emissions – rather than just those above a certain level – would meet the industry’s targets to reduce emissions 20% between 2008 and 2030, 70% by 2040 and then reach net zero “by or around, i.e. close to 2050”. This is highly unlikely to be adopted.

Additional talks will be held from November 23-27 and from November 30-December 3 before a potentially final round of official negotiations begins on December 4.

The post London talks raise hopes for green shipping deal appeared first on Climate Home News.

'We need to hold on to hope' Channel News brendan 7th September 2026 Teaser Media

Glyphosate is the most common weed killer in the United States. Known as the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup, it’s used so heavily on crops that residues show up in many foods and beverages, including beer. In February, Green America tested five of the most popular beers in the U.S. for glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), a breakdown product of glyphosate. Contamination was detected in every sample, and the highest level measured was 3.33 ng/g (Heineken).

While this concentration is below the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) acceptable levels, even low-level residues matter because pesticide exposure can build up in our bodies over time. Studies have shown that lower-dose, repeated exposures are likely more harmful than acute exposures. Other research has tied glyphosate exposure directly to cancer.

Glyphosate residues in beer alone are concerning because it’s such a popular beverage. However, beer isn’t the only food product that can expose people to glyphosate—it may also be in many other foods and drinks we consume.

Bayer, which acquired Monsanto in 2018, removed glyphosate from its home and garden products after facing tens of thousands of lawsuits filed by farmers and others exposed to glyphosate, claiming that the company didn’t warn them of the potential risk of cancer. One case brought by a farmer who used Roundup for decades and developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is currently being heard by the Supreme Court.

Despite these clear risks, glyphosate is still used in Monsanto’s agricultural or professional products.

And just last year, the major 2000 study that supposedly demonstrated the safety of glyphosate was retracted for being ghost-written by Monsanto scientists. In the “scathing retraction notice,” Martin van den Berg, toxicologist and co–editor-in-chief of Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, wrote:

The article’s conclusions regarding the carcinogenicity of glyphosate are solely based on unpublished studies from Monsanto, which have failed to demonstrate tumorigenic potential. The handling (co) Editor-in-Chief also became aware that by the time of writing of this article in the journal, the authors did not include multiple other long-term chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies, that were already done at the time of writing their review in 1999.

Naomi Oreskes, a historian of science at Harvard University and best-selling author of Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Climate Change, said: “My worry is that people will keep citing it.” She and fellow researcher Alexander Kaurov published a report last year finding that over 800 scientific papers cited the retracted Monsanto study since it was published.

In 2019, the Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) tested 20 beers and wines, 19 of which contained glyphosate. At the time, critics relied on the U.S. EPA’s approved pesticide levels to argue that the contamination was unlikely to affect human health, and that the costs were outweighed by the benefits of “higher yields, economic gains for farmers and a decrease in other more toxic herbicides.” Quoting an industry spokesperson, one article claimed that “an adult would have to drink more than 140 glasses of wine a day” to ingest a dangerous level of glyphosate.

But the EPA does not fully account for cumulative, long-term exposure, nor the potential effects of chemical mixtures over time. The EPA’s position that glyphosate does not pose harmful risks to human health when used according to label instructions has been the subject of sustained criticism, including documented concerns about regulatory capture and industry influence (e.g. Merchants of Poison).

On average, Americans drink 26.5 gallons of beer per year. That high consumption rate and broad reach mean many people are exposed to a substantial cumulative concentration of pesticides in beer. Furthermore, the U.S. is the number 1 exporter of hops (unless you count the EU as a whole) and the U.S. is the number 7 exporter of barley. Given beer’s popularity, this could potentially harm millions of Americans and beer-drinkers worldwide, and pesticides used on beer crops could expose growers, farmworkers, beer producers, local communities, and the environment to toxic pesticides as well.

Many cities, states, and countries have banned glyphosate or are in the process of banning or restricting it, and most health advocates argue that all exposure to pesticides should be minimized. Previous studies have also found that there are many other pesticides besides glyphosate found in beer. Beyond Pesticides found 58 pesticides on barley alone, 22 of which are acutely toxic; 53 are linked to chronic health problems, including cancer; 18 contaminate streams or groundwater; and 49 are poisonous to wildlife.

Companies should set supplier standards, test routinely, and move sourcing away from glyphosate-dependent practices as part of an overall plan to reduce and eliminate toxic pesticides in their supply chains. That means setting up clear deadlines to phase out harmful pesticides from supply chains, starting with high-impact ingredients like barley and hops.

Brewers can also partner with growers to adopt integrated pest management (IPM) and expand organic farming practices, set ingredient standards, ensure complete supply chain transparency and support farmers and farmworkers to move away from glyphosate.

Consumers also hold power, and it starts with building awareness. We can all save beer by contacting brands and local breweries to ask where they source barley and wheat from. Do they restrict pre-harvest glyphosate? Do they test for glyphosate and AMPA?

Consumers can also choose for organic beers, which tend to have the lowest levels of glyphosate and are already working to end pesticide use and improve agricultural practices in the supply chain. Unless they are organic, craft beers can have higher levels of glyphosate and other pesticides because they are unfiltered and unpasteurized, so pesticide components aren’t broken down as much.

Believe it or not, we can all force progress by choosing beer that’s produced with more care for our environment and our health. Start by supporting better agriculture and buying from producers using verified organic and regenerative practices that restrict pesticide reliance. Get to know your local craft brewers and let them know how important their ingredient sourcing is to you. Even large-scale brewers tend to offer a line of organic beers, so buying those products can send a message that more organic beer can lead to greater company profits.

Beer lovers who want to make a difference can also get involved by signing on to Green America’s action to halt the use of toxic pesticides in beer production and supporting policy proposals that lower pesticide residue tolerances and require more robust, independent testing.

Articles like the one you just read are made possible through the generosity of Food Tank members. Can we please count on you to be part of our growing movement? Become a member today by clicking here.

Photo courtesy of Amie Johnson, Unsplash

The post Op-Ed | Beer Can Be Saved from Pesticide Contamination. Here’s What Companies and Consumers Need to Do. appeared first on Food Tank.

GFC members and allies are helping to build a new gender-just map of community-led solutions for forests, people and the planet.

What does a real solution to the climate and biodiversity crises look like?

It might be an agroecological farming system rooted in traditional knowledge. It might be a community defending its territory from extractive industries. It might be women organising to protect forests, strengthen food sovereignty or build more equitable forms of community governance.

And it is not just about what communities are doing. It is also about what makes these solutions possible, and just as importantly, what stands in their way.

These questions are at the heart of a new Gender-Just Real Solutions Map for Forests and Communities being developed by the Global Forest Coalition (GFC), with support from Bread for the World (Brot für die Welt) and the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation (RLF). Over three online sessions held in July and August, GFC members and allies from across the Global South have been working together to shape the ideas, criteria and methodology that will underpin the map.

The process began in July with a discussion about what a false solution is, and what makes a solution real. Participants shared examples from their own territories and explored how community-led alternatives differ from false solutions that can reproduce environmental destruction, inequality and corporate control. Importantly, the group agreed that the map should focus on concrete, localised practices rooted in particular territories, rather than treating “solutions” as generic or easily scalable commodities.

The second session put gender justice at the centre. Rather than treating gender as simply a question of whether women are represented or participate, participants explored who does the work, including unpaid care and domestic work; who makes decisions; who controls land, resources and income; and what would make an initiative genuinely gender-just. The discussion also considered how the map itself can challenge the underlying colonial and patriarchal systems that shape relationships between people, territories and nature.

Members of a community forest user group are managing their community forest in Nawalparasi district. Nawalparsi FECOFUN

As Jaqueline Santos of FASE, a GFC member group in Brazil, explained, women in Pará play a leading role in agriculture and in protecting their territories. She also highlighted the importance of women’s groups and support networks in rural communities, where women facing violence can struggle to access formal systems of support.

“Their perspective, their understanding of what constitutes a territory, and their knowledge of what must be preserved and protected are given much greater prominence and attention by women,” said Santos. “In Brazil, we have a situation where it’s very difficult to report violence in the city. In rural areas, it’s very difficult to file a report (…) There’s an entire system that doesn’t support women who have been victims of violence. The state is designed for men. We work intensively on the issue of violence with support groups. There must be women’s groups in these communities, because there’s no space for women in groups where men participate,” she said. 

The third session then turned to a question that is crucial for understanding how real solutions can flourish: what conditions do they require?

Participants discussed ecological, social, economic, political and cultural conditions, including community organising, legal frameworks, self-determination, autonomous governance, community-led financing and gender-responsive practices. They also identified barriers ranging from extractive projects and land grabbing to patriarchal policies, colonial legal frameworks, bureaucracy, lack of funding and the criminalisation of environmental defenders.

Ariella Kabunga of the Integrated Program for the Development of the Pygmy People in Kivu (PIDP) stressed that gender justice requires more than gender-just laws on paper. Women must be able to participate meaningfully in decision-making, influence decisions and take on positions of responsibility.

“We need political and legal frameworks to ensure equal rights for women. But it is not enough to have gender-just laws and policies. It is also necessary to ensure the dissemination, application, and monitoring implementation at the national, local, and community levels. Community organizations and structures must integrate gender into their policies, programs, budgets and decision-making mechanisms,” Kabunga said. “Another fundamental condition is the effective participation of women in decision-making processes. It is not enough to invite women to a meeting. They must have the opportunity to express themselves, influence decisions, and hold positions of responsibility.”

These discussions are now helping to build the map itself. The first set of inclusion and exclusion criteria is being shared with participants for validation and further input, while GFC and the Critical Geography Collective (CGC) are also working with participants to develop a protocol for protecting information and safeguarding data.

The emerging methodology will ensure that the map is not simply a collection of points on a screen. Each entry will tell a story: What is the initiative? Why is it a real solution? Who is involved? Where and when is it happening? And how has it been made possible? Users will be able to explore different kinds of initiatives, from agroecology and forest protection to traditional knowledge, sustainable livelihoods and territories free from extractivism, as well as the conditions that have enabled them to flourish.

The map will therefore be a space to see and learn from each other’s experiences, forms of resistance and social action, rather than imposing a single model of what a solution should look like. As the project’s methodology notes, real solutions are diverse, territorial and shaped by the communities themselves. The map is intended to grow from that diversity and remain open to continued revision and learning.

Ultimately, the goal is to make visible what too often remains invisible: the people, practices, rights and conditions that already offer pathways towards protecting forests, biodiversity and communities, without relying on markets to put a price on nature.

The Gender-Just Real Solutions Map for Forests and Communities is expected to launch in November 2026, with the database continuing to grow beyond the initial launch.

Stay tuned — the map is taking shape.

A map built collectively

The Gender-Just Real Solutions Map is being developed collaboratively with the Critical Geography Collective (CGC) and GFC members and allies working with communities and movements across the Global South. Organisations participating in the design of the map, its criteria and its initial entries include:

• Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers Association (BELA) — Bangladesh
• Federation of Social and Educational Assistance Organisations (FASE) — Brazil
• Fundación de Expresión Intercultural, Educativa y Ambiental (FUNDAEXPRESIÓN) — Colombia
• Colectivo VientoSur — Chile
• Programme Intégré pour le Développement du Peuple Pygmée au Kivu (PIDP) — Democratic Republic of Congo
• Instituto para el Futuro Común Amerindio (IFCA) — Honduras
• Federation of Community Forestry Users Nepal (FECOFUN) — Nepal
• National Forum for Advocacy Nepal (NAFAN) — Nepal
• Centro de Desarrollo Ambiental y Humano (CENDAH) — Panama
• Zambia Social Forum (ZAMSOF) — Zambia
• Global Tapestry of Alternatives (GTA) — global network
• Latin American and Caribbean Platform for Climate Justice (PLACJC) — regional network

Have a real solution to share? 

We are also inviting organisations and community groups to suggest initiatives or projects that they think meet the map’s criteria. If you know of a community-led initiative that could belong on the map, please contact Valentina Figuera Martínez, GFC’s Gender Justice and Forests Campaign Coordinator, who is leading the project, at valentinafmartinez@globalforestcoalition.org.

Headline News:

• “Fuel Prices At Record Labor Day High Thanks To Iran War And Refinery Issues” • It’s never been more expensive to fill up a tank and take one last summer trip over the Labor Day weekend. The average price of regular gas was $4.14 a gallon heading into the holiday. The previous Labor Day record was $3.82 in 2012, according to the AAA. [ABC News]

Dog on a road trip (Hector O’Connor, Unsplash)

• “European Union Is Racing To Rethink Arctic Policy As The Global Power Grab Continues” • Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, is finishing up her two-day tour of the Greenland’s capital, Nuuk. Her aim is to further EU-Arctic relations and to gather intelligence as the EU maps out a new Arctic Policy. [Euronews]
• “IRENA Chief Calls For Tripling Renewable Energy Capacity By 2030” • The global community needs to ensure a threefold increase in renewable energy capacity by 2030, International Renewable Energy Agency Director-General Francesco La Camera said during the opening of Baku Climate Action Week 2026, Report says. [Report.az]
• “Pesticides Cause 400 Million Farmer Poisoning Cases A Year, Study Finds” • Nearly half the world’s farmers get poisoned with pesticides annually, while global pesticide use continues to rise, a study finds. Between 402 and 433 million cases of acute pesticide poisoning occur among farmers and farm workers worldwide each year, according to the study. [Euronews]
• “Feds Launch Probe Into Tesla’s Deployment Of Cybercabs With No Brakes And Steering Wheels” • The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is investigating Tesla’s deployment of approximately 1,000 Cybercab vehicles in Austin, Texas. The Cybercabs have no steering wheels or brake pedals, which are required by NHTSA safety standards. [ABC News]

For more news, please visit geoharvey – Daily News about Energy and Climate Change.