You are here
Restore The San Francisco Bay Area Delta
ICYMI: ‘Uncharted territory’ as brewing El Niño, roasting oceans, heat bring risk for California, planet
A Los Angeles Times article published this week highlights the escalating climate risks facing California and the world. With experts forecasting a strengthening El Niño, continued record-breaking temperatures, and mounting concern over rapidly warming oceans, these threats are no longer theoretical, but unfolding now.
The article cites officials who confirmed that global sea surface temperature reached a record high this month. Warmer oceans increase the likelihood of extreme precipitation, flooding, and stronger storms, while also contributing to sea level rise and placing significant stress on marine ecosystems and wildlife.
Scientists also warn that El Niño is expected to prolong an ongoing marine heat wave, creating an extended period of abnormally warm ocean temperatures that can have devastating impacts on marine life.
These climate-driven changes also threaten water supplies across the West, contributing to more severe droughts and heat waves. The article exemplifies the urgent need for California to adapt its water management strategies by investing in sustainable, local water solutions rather than relying on large-scale water diversion schemes that will become increasingly unreliable as climate change reduces available supplies.
Legislative Roundup: Progress on Key Water Bills, One Bad Bill Defeated, One Advances
Several critical water bills that we are tracking at Restore the Delta were heard in the Legislature this week – here are some key updates.
SB 872 Passes Through Committee
SB 872, a bill that would dedicate $300 million annually to address two major threats to California’s water supply, aging levees in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and sinking canals in the State Water Project (SWP), passed the Assembly Water, Parks, and Wildlife Committee with unanimous approval.
We’re excited by the bill’s passage out of committee. Thank you to Senator McNerney for advancing legislation that prioritizes safeguarding California’s water supplies, protecting critical infrastructure, and preparing the state’s water system for future challenges. SB 872 will next be heard in the Committee on Appropriations.
AB 2215 is Pulled from Committee
In another positive development for the Delta, AB 2215 has been pulled from committee and is no longer advancing this legislative session. We thank our supporters and coalition partners for their work to stop the extension of water rights for the Delta Conveyance Project. We also appreciate the Senate Natural Resources and Water for carefully examining the bill’s implications and holding firm on amendments that returned it to the appropriate regulatory pathway. This outcome reinforces that the Department of Water Resources and the State Water Contractors must follow the same established regulatory processes as all other water rights holders.
AB 2218 Passes Through Committee
AB 2218, a bill that seeks to address inequities in California water policy inflicted on California Native tribes, passed the Senate Environmental Quality Committee. AB 2218 will next be heard in the Committee on Appropriations.
As California faces growing climate-driven challenges, policymakers and communities increasingly recognize that equitable and sustainable water management must incorporate Tribal rights, traditional ecological knowledge, and Tribal governance. AB 2218 directs state agencies to strengthen consultation with Tribes during water rights investigations and develop policies that address water related harms resulting from state-sanctioned termination, removal, and assimilation of California Native American tribes.
AB 2026 Advances
Unfortunately, one problematic bill did advance through committee. AB 2026 is not the narrow groundwater recharge measure its supporters describe. Instead, it creates broad new pathways to divert already-over allocated surface water, weakens public and environmental review, and shifts risk onto rivers, Delta communities, salmon, Tribes, and existing water users.
Restore the Delta supports responsible groundwater recharge, but AB 2026 is the wrong approach. We will continue to monitor the bill’s progress and advocate for groundwater recharge policies that are guided by science and administered through the State Water Board’s established regulatory framework, not through broad statutory shortcuts that bypass water-rights, fish and wildlife protections, and the public interest.
Quotes from Restore the Delta and partners:
Cintia Cortez, Policy Program Manager, Restore the Delta:
“This week, the California Legislature made progress on timely investments to protect Delta residents and water supply, and addressing inequities inflicted upon California Native tribes, while standing firm against interference in the water rights process. We urge the legislature to stand with community and Tribal interests and move away from policies that perpetuate ongoing inequities in California water management.”
Barry Nelson, Senior Policy Advisor, Golden State Salmon Association:
“Supporters of AB 2026 claim that it is designed to recharge groundwater and protect the environment. The truth is the bill is cynically written to allow enormous increases in pumping during the juvenile salmon migration season even when river conditions are dry. The bill could cause serious additional damage to salmon runs and the fishing industry that is struggling to recover after the mismanagement of our rivers during the last drought. The State Water Board must set science-based standards to require river flows needed to protect the environment and salmon jobs. That will allow us to properly identify the rare times when there is excess water in the system.”
Chris Shutes, Executive Director, California Sportfishing Protection Alliance:
“We are very pleased that the author pulled AB 2215. The State Water Project now has to continue normal public process and environmental review to get the right to divert more water from the Delta. We are grateful to Senate committee staff for pushing back on the potential precedent of overriding the water rights process through legislation. We are also grateful to all those who visited so many offices to educate senate staff about this very bad bill.”
###
URGENT ACTION ALERT: Contact Senator Becker to oppose AB 2215
Dear Friends,
The State Water Contractors are attempting to advance AB 2215 as a legislative solution to DWR’s expired water rights for the State Water Project and the DCP, rather than through proper procedure at the State Water Board. The bill, authored by Assemblymember Calderon, will be heard at the Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee at 9 am on Wednesday, July 1st.
We need your help urging the Chair of the Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee, Senator Becker, to side with Delta communities.
Call Senator Becker at (916) 651-4013.
If passed, AB 2215 would:
- Permit the SWP for construction and increased water diversions through 2046 to the benefit of The Delta Conveyance Project.
- Circumvent existing processes through the State Water Resources Control Board that would both require an Environmental Impact Report; and analyze impacts to public trust, Tribal and environmental justice communities, and the Delta ecosystem.
The Delta is a severely over-allocated system. Any new water infrastructure proposing to increase diversions must go through the regulatory process to protect Delta communities, ecosystem, and local fishing and recreation economies.
TAKE ACTION!
Call Senator Becker at (916) 651-4013 and use this script urging their office to oppose AB 2215:
Hello Senator (LAST NAME),
“I am calling to ask that you oppose AB 2215 and legislative interference in water rights, especially in relation to the Delta Conveyance Project. This bill circumvents existing processes that would provide comprehensive analysis of the impacts of such an extension, and benefits controversial projects like the Delta Conveyance Project. The bill would also eliminate the public’s ability to provide input. I ask that you side with our community that will be negatively impacted by this project rather than State Water Contractors who continuously work to undermine transparency and full inclusion of Californians in water management. The tunnel is a dangerous symptom of ineffective California water management.”
It is time for our Delta communities to come together and stop the machine. Raise your voices and help us fight for the watershed, the Delta, fisheries, Tribes, Delta farming communities, the San Francisco Bay, and the people throughout the state who are impacted one way or another by the Delta Tunnel Boondoggle.
In solidarity,
The Restore the Delta Team
ICYMI: Political pressure on Sites Reservoir and how one Delta impacts 27 million people
In a revealing commentary published by Maven’s Notebook, Eric Buescher of San Francisco Baykeeper and Chris Shutes of the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance criticize Governor Newsom and other political figures’ efforts to push through the multi-billion dollar Sites Reservoir project despite extensive evidence that it would seriously harm waterways and ecosystems, a conclusion reached by the State Water Resources Control Board’s Administrative Hearings Office (AHO).
The authors describe attempts by the Governor and other powerful politicians to pressure the AHO into retracting its evidence-based findings on the project’s environmental impacts as “overt political meddling.
Buescher and Shutes note that these actions represent a troubling attempt to undermine neutral decision-making bodies and disregard impartial scientific expertise. Rather than yielding to political pressure, they argue that the Sites Project Authority should take the AHO’s findings seriously.
Read the full piece here.
Listen to a New Episode of The Climate Dispatch, the official Sierra Club California podcast featuring Restore the Delta!
In the latest episode of The Climate Dispatch, Sierra Club California’s official podcast, we take listeners inside California’s Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, an estuary that provides drinking water to 27 million people, supports millions of acres of farmland, and serves as a critical habitat for hundreds of species.
Alongside our Director of Policy and Programs, Morgen Snyder, and our Delta Science Program Manager, Spencer Fern, this episode highlights Stockton’s waterways and the surrounding Bay-Delta to explore the complexity of the remarkable ecosystem.
Along the way, scientists, advocates, and local anglers who depend on the Delta, such as Bud Chaddock, share what they’ve witnessed firsthand: the impacts of declining water quality, harmful algal blooms, disappearing fish populations, and decades of water diversion.
Listen to the full episode here.
###
Delta Tribal Environmental Coalition urges lawmakers to reject bill threatening water oversight and public participation
For Immediate Release:
June 22, 2026
Contact:
Ashley Castaneda, ashley@restorethedelta.org
SACRAMENTO — On behalf of The Delta Tribal Environmental Coalition (DTEC), the Environmental Justice Law and Advocacy Clinic at Yale Law School has submitted a letter to the California Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee opposing AB 2215. DTEC consists of the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians, Winnemem Wintu Tribe, Little Manila Rising, and Restore the Delta. Coalition members warn that the bill is an attempt to clear the path for controversial projects, including the Delta Conveyance Project, without proper regulatory and public oversight.
AB 2215 would extend the Department of Water Resources’ (DWR) water rights permit for the State Water Project by more than forty years, overriding established State Water Board authority and limiting public participation in critical water rights proceedings. The coalition argues that the bill would undermine longstanding procedures governing water rights permit extensions, grant preferential treatment to DWR, and bypass established hearing processes designed to ensure permit extensions serve the public interest.
The letter describes the bill as the latest effort by DWR to exempt itself from rules that apply to all other water rights holders, at the expense of the environment, Delta communities, Tribes, and the public interest.
At a time when the Bay-Delta watershed faces ecological crisis, the coalition emphasizes the importance of maintaining robust State Water Board processes that ensure transparency, accountability, and meaningful public participation in water management decisions. The coalition is urging senators to reject AB 2215 and preserve the safeguards that allow Tribes, Delta communities, and other key stakeholders to participate in decisions that affect California’s water future.
STATEMENTS FROM COALITION MEMBERS:
Vice Chair Malissa Tayaba, Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians
“The reason that water rights permit extensions require public interest evaluation and environmental review is so that Tribes and others can provide input on impacts and alternatives and the State Water Board can issue an informed decision. AB 2215 would circumvent that process, eliminating our voices and perpetuating centuries of injustice.”
Gary Mulcahy, Government Liaison with the Winnemem Wintu Tribe
“Apparently, existing rules and regulations proved inconvenient for DWR. Rather than follow the established process, the solution appears to be seeking a special legislative exemption so those requirements no longer apply.”
Cintia Cortez, Program Manager, Restore the Delta
“Eliminating the Water Board’s ability to establish regulatory conditions, as directed by the legislature, sets a dangerous precedent. The state cannot achieve equitable management of limited water resources by granting regulatory exemptions.”
###
The Fine Print I:
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are not the official position of the IWW (or even the IWW’s EUC) unless otherwise indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone but the author’s, nor should it be assumed that any of these authors automatically support the IWW or endorse any of its positions.
Further: the inclusion of a link on our site (other than the link to the main IWW site) does not imply endorsement by or an alliance with the IWW. These sites have been chosen by our members due to their perceived relevance to the IWW EUC and are included here for informational purposes only. If you have any suggestions or comments on any of the links included (or not included) above, please contact us.
The Fine Print II:
Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc.
It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.





