You are here
Big Business, Political Allies Look to Turn Hurricane Crises to Their Advantage
By Samantha Winslow - Labor Notes, September 25, 2017
You have to hand it to Big Business and their minions: in every storm cloud they find a silver lining.
The hazards faced by residents of Texas and Florida (and now Puerto Rico) come not just from the flooding but from business interests eager to take advantage of the crisis to toss out the rules—“it’s an emergency”—and squeeze workers.
Days after Harvey hit Texas, Grover Norquist’s right-wing think tank Americans for Tax Reform was already calling for suspending Davis-Bacon on the Houston clean-up and rebuild. That’s the law that requires prevailing wage standards (read: living wage) for businesses getting federal contracts.
With Trump as president, companies are hoping for a permanent repeal.
The precedent is there. After Katrina, President Bush suspended Davis-Bacon for six months, allowing contractors to drastically lower their wages. When Davis-Bacon was reinstated, existing low-wage contracts were grandfathered in.
Bush also suspended OSHA’s enforcement of health and safety standards and had the EPA waive standards for emissions and fuel refineries.
COMPETITION = LOWER WAGES
Twelve years ago New Orleans saw a massive exodus of its population, many of whom never returned, both their houses and their jobs gone.
But employers took advantage of the crisis to pit workers against each other, driving wages down. Rather than pay living wages to draw back displaced residents to work the clean-up, contractors brought in guest workers on H-2B visas. Horror stories emerged about conditions for workers at shipyards and construction sites.
Indian workers paid $20,000 each to recruiters for Mississippi oil rigs, with the promise of permanent status in the U.S. They were relegated to labor camps and charged $1,000 a month to live 24 men to a room, guarded by security who threatened to deport anyone who protested.
Workers ended up winning $14 million after organizing and filing suit.
When 300 workers mostly from South America arrived to work at a local hotel chain—making less than the mostly African American employees had before Katrina hit—they were housed eight to a room in an unfinished mold-infested property.
After paying more than $3,000 in recruitment and travel fees, they saw their hours cut. They sued, too.
One study found 100,000 Latino workers travelled to the region for jobs related to the cleanup. Another informal survey found 60 percent of immigrant workers doing post-Katrina rebuilding were cheated out of pay for some of their work.
These examples of exploitation spurred reform to the H-2B visa program and the formation of worker centers in the region to help workers fight back.
EXPLOITING THE CRISIS
Katrina was an opportunity for massive privatization, even with no logical connection to storm damage. The state of Louisiana fired all New Orleans teachers and school employees (the majority African American and women) and replaced all but four public schools with privately run charters.
New Orleans now has the highest percentage of students enrolled in privately run schools of any city, 93 percent. New teachers are younger and whiter than the veteran teachers they replaced (and mostly non-union).
If business has its way, workers will be on their own facing the hazards the storms will leave behind. In the oil and gas capital of the U.S., the explosion of the Arkema chemical plant is just the tip of the iceberg.
Texas doesn’t require worker’s compensation coverage and an estimated 40 percent of construction workers don’t have health insurance. With the anti-immigrant climate President Trump has fostered, undocumented workers will be even more fearful of speaking out against unsafe conditions.
While Americans hope for an “all hands on deck” spirit in helping dig out Gulf States residents, we should be wary of laying hopes of long-term recovery in the hands of business. We still need job protections and living wages. Shortcuts today may mean permanent damage.
Editor's note: This piece was written before Hurricane Maria's devastating strike on Puerto Rico, which will face the same issues but magnified by the island's declaration of bankruptcy in May. Even as Hurricane Irma, which hit the island far less hard than Maria, approached, Puerto Rico's governor and other officials said the predicted outages would make a good case for privatization of the public electric utility. Governor Ricardo Rossello told the New York Times that Irma “can become an opportunity or another liability.”
Disclaimer: The views expressed here are not the official position of the IWW (or even the IWW’s EUC) and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone but the author’s.
The Fine Print I:
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are not the official position of the IWW (or even the IWW’s EUC) unless otherwise indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone but the author’s, nor should it be assumed that any of these authors automatically support the IWW or endorse any of its positions.
Further: the inclusion of a link on our site (other than the link to the main IWW site) does not imply endorsement by or an alliance with the IWW. These sites have been chosen by our members due to their perceived relevance to the IWW EUC and are included here for informational purposes only. If you have any suggestions or comments on any of the links included (or not included) above, please contact us.
The Fine Print II:
Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc.
It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.