You are here

Farmworkers Say “Us Too,” Demanding Freedom From Sexual Violence

By Michelle Chen - In These Times, November 21, 2017

Ahead of the Thanksgiving feast, the Coalition of Immokalee Workers (CIW) hit midtown Manhattan on Monday to face down the suits with chants of “Exploitation has got to go!” CIW was there to demand humane working conditions on their farms.

Peppered with brass-band musicians and street puppets, the protesters rallied at the New York, N.Y. offices of the fast food giant Wendy’s.

CIW members hoisted tomato and bucket-shaped picket signs with slogans like “freedom from sexual violence” and “Justicia” to face off against Wendy’s cheery, red pigtails. They demanded fair wages and freedom from violence and exploitation.

This week’s march, part of the coalition’s multi-city tour to promote its Fair Food labor protection program, put women workers at the frontlines, protesting the epidemic of sexual assault in agricultural labor, which affects as many as eight in ten women.

Decades before labor-relations courts and bureaucracy-laden contract negotiations, workplace disputes with powerful corporations were resolved with fists and clubs. And in Trump’s America, CIW workers are turning Florida’s vast tomato fields into the latest frontline in the struggle for the rights and dignity of immigrant communities.

“As farmworker women, this experience poses an incredibly hard choice; we don’t have another job, we have to suffer this abuse, because we have a family to maintain,” said organizer Lupe Gonzalo, speaking on the violence that stalks women working the fields, at an October gathering at a Minnesota theater. “Our silence is something we must grow accustomed to every day.”

Voices like Gonzalo’s rarely take the public spotlight in conversations on sexual violence and discrimination, but her words resonate deeply on the edges of the economy. As a minority in a male-dominated workforce, working in brutal, isolated conditions, women are exposed daily to sexual violence, be it coworkers’ harassment or rape by supervisors.

Although agribusiness corporations have historically failed to address sexual abuse in their supply chains, CIW members say they’ve virtually eliminated sexual harassment from the fields they’ve organized via targeted enforcement, broad-based monitoring and worker education efforts. Additionally, strong community support and the group’s pioneering Fair Food Program (FFP) has helped break the culture of silence in the fields by making women’s rights everybody’s business—from coworkers and neighbors all the way up to multinational restaurant chains.

Wendy’s is now the lone holdout among the large restaurant chains that CIW has pushed over the years to sign onto its FFP code of conduct. Since the 1990s, the group has marched on college campuses, rallied at corporate offices and lobbied on Capitol Hill to promote an innovative form of collective worker protection that has evolved into FFP's worker-led social responsibility system.

Though not a formal union contract, the program's model, which now protects some 35,000 workers, essentially provides a bill of rights for thousands of laborers in Florida’s heavily consolidated agribusiness sector to promote structural change at all levels of the industry. The binding agreement mandates that all companies in the supply chain—including growers and retailers—provide an additional penny-per-pound premium that is passed through to pickers. This adds a considerable amount to workers’ annual wages. Meanwhile, the agreement ensures enforceable standards for fair working conditions, job security through direct, long-term employment and due process for abuse complaints.

The coalition's worker-driven social responsibility model sets a “zero tolerance” rule for violations to prevent wage theft, trafficking and workplace sexual violence.

“If there is a farm that is participating that is refusing to correct the situation in a timely fashion and bring swift consequences for abusers, then the market consequences kick in, because the corporations can no longer buy from those farms," Oscar Otzoy, a CIW organizer, told In These Times.

He says the underlying power of the process is its transformational effect on the worker community by helping train and empower workers as their own advocates for rights and safety at work.

“One of the essential elements of the coalition is that it is led by farmworkers themselves, and so we are from that community,” Otzoy says. “We share the same values and the same experiences and the same realities, so there is trust with workers that their complaints will be brought to a solution."

Often that solution is not just punishment, but also ensuring that the victim will receive needed rehabilitation services.

The CIW’s campaign has targeted a host of large chain restaurants, supermarkets and institutional purchasers, like university food vendors. But unlike Whole Foods and Taco Bell, Wendy’s continues to insist that its own corporate code of conduct can effectively be applied instead of the FFP.

In a statement sent to In These Times, Wendy's said that it is “promoting human rights and safe working conditions” through its own social responsibility program, with “assurances and requirements related to human rights and labor practices.” The company dismissed CIW's campaign as part of a “commercial dispute,” since Wendy's refuses to “pay fees to their organization” to support FFP.

Wary of self-regulating corporate standards, the CIW counters that the company is actually “deriving a very real cost advantage over its competitors, while continuing to provide an alternative market for less reputable growers.”

But while CIW’s model has garnered high-profile accolades, including honors from the Obama White House, it has also gotten the attention of anti-labor activists. The right-wing “watchdog” Center for Union Facts (CUF) issued a complaint in early November to federal tax authorities challenging CIW’s tax-exempt status as an educational charity, insisting that CIW is in fact a union front group—and should be regulated as such.

Painting the CIW’s protests as mob-like tactics promoting “harassment” of companies, the CUF argues, “CIW is essentially a group operating for the private financial benefit of a small class of people (certain agricultural workers).”

CIW defines its “small class” as the whole farmworker proletariat, and their model developed in response to the structural barriers to unionization in the highly stratified agricultural workforce where workers are unstable, often undocumented and intensely poor.

They operate like a union in terms of engaging in negotiations with bosses, but have more tactical agility in that they do not rely on institutionalized majoritarian reputation but grassroots mobilization.

As for the complaint about its tax status, Otzoy said those who complain “are just trying to roll back the human rights advances that we've been able to achieve.”

The FFP has spread widely, and CIW is working to bring their model to strawberry, pepper and dairy farms elsewhere in the United States. “It's the workers who are still speaking on behalf of themselves and moving forward the movement,” Otzoy says.

So when CIW worker-activists amplify women’s voices from Florida’s tomato harvests into the Manhattan’s streets, they put muscle behind Gonzalo's declaration as she spoke to communities across country: “We had to draw on enormous strength and courage in order to break our silence—but also, we did not do it alone.”

See Also: Peasant men and women say ‘End Violence against Women!’ - by staff, La Via Campesina, November 25, 2017

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are not the official position of the IWW (or even the IWW’s EUC) and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone but the author’s.

The Fine Print I:

Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are not the official position of the IWW (or even the IWW’s EUC) unless otherwise indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone but the author’s, nor should it be assumed that any of these authors automatically support the IWW or endorse any of its positions.

Further: the inclusion of a link on our site (other than the link to the main IWW site) does not imply endorsement by or an alliance with the IWW. These sites have been chosen by our members due to their perceived relevance to the IWW EUC and are included here for informational purposes only. If you have any suggestions or comments on any of the links included (or not included) above, please contact us.

The Fine Print II:

Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc.

It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.