You are here

Members speak out to protect climate, clean energy jobs

By staff - Kentuckians For The Commonwealth, December 11, 2017

In the final week of November, KFTC members Russell Oliver, Stanley Sturgill, Henry Jackson, Teri Blanton, Roger Ohlman, Mary Dan Easley and Mary Love converged in Charleston, West Virginia – alongside hundreds of other concerned people – to testify to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) against the agency’s proposed repeal of the Clean Power Plan.

“Now that we have cleaner, safer and cheaper ways to generate energy, the only question should be: how can we create more of those new jobs right here and right now in Appalachia? I know this because not only have I lived it, I’m still trying my best to keep living it,” said Stanley Sturgill of Harlan County, a retired coal miner and KFTC member.

Sturgill and others urged the EPA not to eliminate the Clean Power Plan rule. Issued in 2014, the plan is an Obama administration regulation that calls on states to develop plans for modestly reducing their carbon pollution. Most would do that through energy efficiency programs, development of solar and wind power, and reducing the amount of coal burned. States have lots of flexibility on how they choose to meet the standard.

Kentucky’s utilities would be required to reduce their carbon dioxide pollution by 31 percent by 2030 from the baseline of 2012 – something that will mostly be achieved anyway through coal plant retirements that have already happened or have been recently announced.

But, to meet or exceed the standard, the state also needs to adopt some new policies and strategies to reduce energy consumption and get more from renewable energy.

Instead, the EPA is proposing to do away with the rule, which has never actually been implemented due to court challenges. What’s more, the EPA’s proposed repeal of the Clean Power Plan has not followed the in-depth public engagement process that went into creating the plan.

KFTC member Mary Love pointed this out in her testimony to the EPA.

“This hearing today is not the conversation Americans want or deserve. We should be talking about how to improve the Clean Power Plan, not scrap it. We should be talking about how to better protect the health of low-income people and people of color who are on the front lines in places where fossil fuels are extracted, processed, transported and burned.”

Because the EPA’s hearing process was far from accessible or inclusive, KFTC members also attended the Hearing for Healthy Communities that the Sierra Club put on across the street from the capitol building. At this people’s hearing, Mary Dan Easley read a poem titled “Declaration of Interdependence” by David Suzuki.

Also at the Hearing for Healthy Communities, Teri Blanton, a KFTC member who grew up in Harlan County, read the testimony that she would give to the EPA the next day.

“Our people have been producing energy for this nation for over 100 years. We’re proud of our heritage. But there is no reason we should stay stuck in time as the world changes.

“Why shouldn’t eastern Kentucky be in the forefront of a clean energy revolution?” she asked. “Why shouldn’t we seize this moment to create jobs in wind, solar and hydropower? Appalachian people are resourceful, skilled and hardworking. We can put our communities back to work – today – by making our homes energy efficient and installing small-scale renewable energy systems.

“That’s true energy independence. This EPA climate plan can and should do much more to help us make this transition to a cleaner energy economy.” 

Many of the KFTC members in Charleston also referenced the Empower Kentucky Plan ( – a people’s energy plan showing that Kentucky can make a just transition to a clean energy economy. Last year, when it became clear that Kentucky officials had no intention of complying with the rule, KFTC took on the task of creating an energy plan for Kentucky, based on input from thousands of Kentuckians.

In the words of Love, “The Empower Kentucky Plan demonstrates that a just transition to a clean energy economy is possible. It shows that the very steps we need to address climate change are also better for jobs and ratepayers – and much better for health – than sticking our heads in the sand and doing nothing. And if we can do that in Kentucky, surely we can do it everywhere.”

Member Henry Jackson testified alongside Love. “What America really needs is a national climate policy coordinating clean energy development and resilience efforts of all eight climate zones of the U.S.,” he argued in his closing statement. “Anything less is irresponsible. The stakes couldn’t be higher.”

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are not the official position of the IWW (or even the IWW’s EUC) and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone but the author’s.

The Fine Print I:

Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are not the official position of the IWW (or even the IWW’s EUC) unless otherwise indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone but the author’s, nor should it be assumed that any of these authors automatically support the IWW or endorse any of its positions.

Further: the inclusion of a link on our site (other than the link to the main IWW site) does not imply endorsement by or an alliance with the IWW. These sites have been chosen by our members due to their perceived relevance to the IWW EUC and are included here for informational purposes only. If you have any suggestions or comments on any of the links included (or not included) above, please contact us.

The Fine Print II:

Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc.

It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.