You are here

Colorado: Support a Just and Equitable Transition via Securitization

By Julia Prochnik - Natural Resources Defense Council, April 24, 2019

Utility securitization can be a prescription for lowering energy costs and reallocating funds previously committed to expensive fuels and reinvesting them in lower cost clean energy infrastructure. Securitization is also a useful financing tool to help fund a Just and Equitable Transition to clean energy infrastructure.

Securitization is a financing tool that has existed in the financial sector for decades and is a special type of utility bond offering that gets funds from private investors at a very low interest rate. It can be used to replace more expensive capital and costs that utilities pass on to customers.  Securitization provides a lower cost to customers. 

Legislation is needed, in Colorado and elsewhere, to guarantee a regulated dedicated rate and an unavoidable charge with Public Utility Commission oversight to ensure that the bonds are paid in full.  This dedicated rate along with other conditions allow for high credit score on the bonds to get the lowest interest rate from investors and therefore the lowest costs for customers. 

For example, when a utility says they need to securitize something, they are looking into refinancing their costs of raising capital at a secured lower bond rate, just as you would with decreasing interest charged on a credit card. The regulated utility can then repurpose the money raised into a variety of cleaner operations and transition funds. 

A Just and Equitable Transition builds from the indigenous and labor movement to create a just transition.  Adding equity expands the policymaking to include diverse community voices and help make change livable for all impacted.  

Just and Equitable Transition describes both where we are going and how we get there. If the process of transition is not just, not fair, the outcome will never be. This type of transition sits at an intersection of labor, finance, social impact, equity and the environment. 

A Just and Equitable Transition for coal communities is... 

Hampered by:

Benefited from:

Insensitivity and unawareness on the part of environmental advocates around the economic and social impacts of coal’s decline that is disproportionately born by coal communities. 

Financial tools to help build a new economy.

Misrepresentation around available funds, economic impacts, timetables, and clear objectives for just and equitable transitions. 

Economic diversification efforts for communities experiencing the retirement of power plants and mining infrastructure.  

Rarity of legislative and regulatory changes to ensure a robust clean economy for impacted communities.

And organizations like The Just Transition Fund that provide a variety of tools to help stimulate transitioning coal communities such as Colstrip, as well as with the closure of Navajo Generating Station.

Communities who have hosted the fossil fuel facilities that powered our country for decades are now adapting to either forced or chosen changes in direction. For example, Navajo Generating Station coal plant is closing because its generation is more expensive than other alternatives means a loss of jobs and property tax revenue, as well as lost businesses that served the power plant or mining workers. 

In designing these changes, we must not only consider environmental impacts, but also the well-being of our families and communities directly affected by the reduction in fossil fuel extraction.

My colleagues note in their “steel for fuel” article, solar and steel can form a bond where local communities form new partnerships to maintain their livelihoods. 

Colorado is demonstrating leadership by supporting legislative and regulatory changes to ensure a resilient clean economy for affected communities.

A transition is never perfect or easy, but with political support, investment, and community involvement, a Just and Equitable Transition is possible. 

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are not the official position of the IWW (or even the IWW’s EUC) and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone but the author.

The Fine Print I:

Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are not the official position of the IWW (or even the IWW’s EUC) unless otherwise indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone but the author’s, nor should it be assumed that any of these authors automatically support the IWW or endorse any of its positions.

Further: the inclusion of a link on our site (other than the link to the main IWW site) does not imply endorsement by or an alliance with the IWW. These sites have been chosen by our members due to their perceived relevance to the IWW EUC and are included here for informational purposes only. If you have any suggestions or comments on any of the links included (or not included) above, please contact us.

The Fine Print II:

Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc.

It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.