You are here

Solidarity with strikers at the Chevron refinery in Richmond, California

By Workers' Voice, East Bay - Socialist Resurgence, March 28, 2022

On March 23, members of Workers’ Voice went out to support striking refinery workers at the Chevron facility in Richmond, Calif. This strike is taking place in the wake of the United Steel Workers’ national oil pattern bargaining agreement with the oil companies, which covers some 30,000 workers at refineries and chemical plants across the country. The pattern bargaining agreement now only covers those 30,000 USW-organized oil and chemical workers whose contract expired this year on Feb. 1, which union locals had to ratify.

In Richmond, over 500 oil workers represented by USW Local 5 rejected the tentative agreement, as it was insufficient to meet their needs. They are thus striking over wages, hours, and other workplace issues, including being forced to work during the peak of the COVID pandemic. They have set up 24-hour pickets, with six-hour shifts. The union has created a solidarity fund and will cover basic expenses of workers who can’t pay their mortgage or get health care or food costs covered.

When we visited, the workers were picketing in shifts of a few dozen workers in front of the refinery gate, keeping up an optimistic mood of camaraderie and humor on a chilly, foggy day.

Many of the drivers of vehicles passing by the picket line honked their horns in support. However, a bothersome Richmond cop and one or two surly truckers wanting to drive into the facility—which the workers were trying to block—attempted, unsuccessfully, to dampen the positive atmosphere.

The grievances of the workers relate to wages and to other grievances as well. They need a raise to keep up with cost of living increases, especially in the brutally expensive Bay Area. They’re also confronting increased health-care costs. A worker told us that their new health-care plan would barely be covered by the wage increase of 2.5% currently on offer. This increase would also not keep up with inflation, which was 7% last year alone. Shopping for groceries is much more expensive now, workers we talked to said. In fact, they added, everything is more expensive.

Workers also talked about a manager who got a 10 percent raise to move up from Los Angeles. This upset workers because that manager is already making a good salary. Moreover, Chevron recently reported billions in profits, the most since 2014; but the boss always says there’s no money for workers.

But workers say they’re not just striking about money.

Other grievances include:

  • Management pushing for language in the contract about disciplining workers who call in sick or refuse to come in on their days off
  • 12-hour shifts
  • Being forced to work during COVID. Workers were getting sick, but they were forced to keep coming to work 
  • A labor shortage and the need to hire more workers 

The worker told us that this is the first time in 24 years that workers at the Richmond facility have gone on strike. One older worker who went on strike 40 years ago said he felt like the situation was repeating itself today. He mentioned the conflict with Russia and inflation, as was happening in the 1980s.

Their strike is an “Unfair Labor Practice Strike” (ULP) because Chevron refused to bargain “in good faith,” which is sanctioned by labor law. Basically, the company refused to even look at the union demands. Despite this, a few workers told us that they were very upset that Chevron management was spreading lies inside the plant, telling the workers that the strike was illegal. This fact made them quite upset.

Chevron-Richmond workers engaged us in broader political conversations, and the level of morale at the picket line was high. There was excitement about what’s happening more generally with labor, in particular the 2021-2022 uptick in strike actions across the United States. They expressed hope that workers at the Chevron refinery in El Segundo, Calif., would vote down their contract on March 23 [as it turned out, the El Segundo workers voted to ratify the company’s “final offer”]. Workers said that the El Segundo contract was slightly worse than the one at Richmond. The Richmond oil workers we spoke with also expressed solidarity with the teachers’ unions.

Chevron management has forced engineers and low management to replace the strikers on the shop floor, but the oil workers are confident this will not work. Their work is hard, dangerous, and requires skill and experience; it usually takes years to get trained to do it by your fellow co-workers. The scab replacements, who are not unionized and were threatened with getting fired if they did not scab, barely got a few “safety trainings” to comply with OSHA guidelines. The striking workers are betting that engineers will not be able to run production because of their lack of expertise and unfamiliarity with safety procedures, and that they will have to sit down to negotiate with the union.

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are not the official position of the IWW (or even the IWW’s EUC) and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone but the author.

The Fine Print I:

Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are not the official position of the IWW (or even the IWW’s EUC) unless otherwise indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone but the author’s, nor should it be assumed that any of these authors automatically support the IWW or endorse any of its positions.

Further: the inclusion of a link on our site (other than the link to the main IWW site) does not imply endorsement by or an alliance with the IWW. These sites have been chosen by our members due to their perceived relevance to the IWW EUC and are included here for informational purposes only. If you have any suggestions or comments on any of the links included (or not included) above, please contact us.

The Fine Print II:

Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc.

It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.