You are here

Global Forest Coalition

Subscribe to Global Forest Coalition feed Global Forest Coalition
The Global Forest Coalition is an international coalition of NGOs and Indigenous Peoples’ Organizations working for social justice plus the conservation and restoration of forest ecosystems
Updated: 1 month 1 week ago

Dominican Justice System Must Overturn Ruling Reducing Jaragua National Park

Fri, 03/06/2026 - 02:18

UTRECHT | March 6, 2026 – The Dominican courts must urgently overturn the amparo decision issued by the Superior Administrative Court (TSA) ordering the reduction of protected areas in Jaragua National Park in the Dominican Republic, which is part of the UNESCO Biosphere Reserve, to make way for private tourism development projects, the Global Forest Coalition said today. The ruling was issued on 20 November 2025, but was only made public in February 2026. 

The decision, which favors a private infrastructure development and real estate investment consortium, violates the Dominican Constitution (articles 16 and 6), the General Environmental Law, and the Sectoral Law on Protected Areas. It also jeopardizes the National System of Protected Areas. Based on these violations, as well as anomalies and a lack of transparency in the process, the Supreme Court of Justice and the Constitutional Court of the Dominican Republic must overturn the ruling. This demand for annulment is supported by the country’s environmental movement and the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources. 

“Jaragua National Park is one of the largest protected areas in the Caribbean and is home to forests with high levels of biodiversity, much of which is endangered or threatened. More than 70,000 hectares of forest would be impacted for the benefit of predatory tourism,” said Darío Solano, coordinator of Red Afros and member of the Board of Directors of the Global Forest Coalition (GFC). “This ruling, in addition to being unconstitutional, violates international commitments to protect biodiversity and fight climate change. The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework clearly sets a target to effectively conserve forest ecosystems, waters, and coastal and marine areas. We have also made commitments to achieve greater coherence in climate action, so this decision is a serious setback.” 

In the Dominican Republic, changing the size of a national park requires the approval of an organic law by two-thirds of the National Congress. “This ruling could set a terrible precedent for further land grabbing, rights violations, and the degradation of marine areas and natural ecosystems. At a time of profound climate crisis and record global warming temperatures, this ruling is an attack on life,” warned Solano. 

“We view this court ruling with great concern. Mass and elite tourism, often promoted as a catalyst for economic development and environmental conservation, can have irreversible impacts on Indigenous Peoples, local communities, Afrodescendant communities, women, youth, and ecosystems,” said Kwami Kpondzo, coordinator of GFC’s Extractive Industries, Tourism, and Infrastructure Campaign. 

 “Protected areas, as a conservation model that emerged under colonialist and patriarchal logic, can already lead to forced displacement and theft of ancestral lands, but this decision shows that even the legal framework can be vulnerable when it comes to defending corporate interests. We must decolonize conservation, confront corporate elites, and prioritize Indigenous and community sovereignty.” The GFC urges the Superior Administrative Court (TSA) and all competent bodies in the Dominican Republic to act expeditiously to suspend this ruling, guarantee environmental protection, promote climate justice, and respect national laws, international commitments, and community rights.

Categories: G1. Progressive Green

The Fine Print I:

Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are not the official position of the IWW (or even the IWW’s EUC) unless otherwise indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone but the author’s, nor should it be assumed that any of these authors automatically support the IWW or endorse any of its positions.

Further: the inclusion of a link on our site (other than the link to the main IWW site) does not imply endorsement by or an alliance with the IWW. These sites have been chosen by our members due to their perceived relevance to the IWW EUC and are included here for informational purposes only. If you have any suggestions or comments on any of the links included (or not included) above, please contact us.

The Fine Print II:

Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc.

It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.