You are here
Counterview
The history of the wedding bouquet: from herbs and garlic to roses
Picture a bride walking down the aisle in ancient Rome, holding a bunch of garlic and dill. Not exactly the Pinterest-ready scene we expect today. Yet that pungent bundle is the great-great-grandparent of the bouquet you see at nearly every American wedding in 2026. The story of how we got from kitchen herbs to garden roses is really a story about fear, hope, status and changing taste.
Why brides first carried herbs, not flowersIn ancient Greece and Rome, a wedding was considered a risky moment. People believed evil spirits were drawn to happy couples, and a bride was thought especially vulnerable. So she carried protection. Garlic and strong-smelling herbs such as dill, sage and chives were bundled together to keep malicious forces away and, ideally, to bring fertility and good fortune.
There was a practical side too. Hygiene in the ancient world was what it was, and aromatic plants helped mask unpleasant smells. I find it oddly touching that the first bridal “bouquet” was part talisman, part air freshener.
Herbs also carried meaning:
- Rosemary stood for remembrance and fidelity.
- Thyme signified courage.
- Ivy, popular in Greece, symbolized an unbreakable bond.
- Myrtle, sacred to Aphrodite and Venus, represented love and marriage.
Brides often wore herbal wreaths on their heads as well, and those crowns slowly shaped the idea that a bride should be wrapped in plants.
Medieval posies, orange blossoms and the origin of the tossBy the Middle Ages, herbs were still central, but sweet-smelling flowers began to join them. Orange blossoms arrived in Europe through trade with the Middle East and quickly became a symbol of purity and fertility. They had a long run as the “official” bridal flower.
The bouquet toss has a less romantic origin. In 14th-century England, guests reportedly believed a piece of the bride’s clothing brought good luck, and some got so eager that they tore at her dress. To escape, brides began throwing their bouquets into the crowd instead. The flowers became a decoy, and the custom stuck. Whoever caught them was said to be next in line to marry.
The Victorian era: when flowers learned to talkThe 19th century changed everything. Queen Victoria married Prince Albert in 1840 wearing a wreath of orange blossoms, and her very public wedding turned floral details into fashion news. A sprig of myrtle from a nosegay given to Victoria in the 1840s was planted at Osborne House, and cuttings from that plant have appeared in royal bridal bouquets ever since.
This was also the golden age of floriography, the “language of flowers.” Small, tightly packed bouquets known as nosegays or tussie-mussies were assembled so that each bloom sent a message. A red rose meant passion, ivy meant fidelity, and lily of the valley meant a return to happiness. A bride’s bouquet could read like a coded love letter, and guests who knew the vocabulary could read it.
Roses gained ground in this period, too. Breeders were producing new hybrids, including the first hybrid tea, ‘La France’, introduced in 1867. Roses became more reliable, more varied and easier to grow, which paved the way for their dominance in the next century.
The twentieth century: from shower bouquets to cascadesBouquet styles started to follow the decades almost like hemlines did.
- 1920s–30s: Long, trailing “shower” bouquets and arm sheaves of calla lilies suited the sleek lines of Art Deco gowns.
- 1950s: Smaller and more formal. Grace Kelly’s 1956 bouquet, a lily of the valley arrangement carried with a prayer book, was widely admired and copied.
- 1960s–70s: Daisies, baby’s breath and loose wildflowers reflected a more relaxed, countercultural mood.
- 1980s: Drama returned. Princess Diana’s 1981 cascade of gardenias, roses, orchids and myrtle set the tone for oversized, sculptural bouquets.
- 1990s–2000s: Tight, round, hand-tied bundles, often all roses or peonies, became the American default.
Cut-flower logistics mattered here, too. Refrigerated shipping and global flower farming meant roses were available year-round at a fair price. That is a big reason the rose became the “classic” choice. It was not always the oldest tradition, just the most dependable one.
What bouquets look like in 2026The pendulum has swung back toward the garden. Many couples now favor loose, asymmetrical arrangements with seasonal stems, fragrant herbs and trailing greenery. If that sounds a bit like ancient Greece, it is. Rosemary, mint, eucalyptus and thyme are popping up in bouquets again, now for texture and scent rather than demon-repelling.
Several trends stand out:
- Heirloom garden roses with ruffled petals and real fragrance, rather than tight, scentless supermarket blooms.
- Locally grown flowers from regional farms, which cut transport and fit the season.
- Dried and preserved elements, which help the bouquet last as a keepsake.
- Personal symbolism, such as a sprig from a grandmother’s garden or a flower tied to a hometown.
One thing I have noticed is that couples increasingly ask what a flower means before they ask what it costs. The Victorians would approve.
What the long history tells usThe wedding bouquet has always reflected what people feared, valued and could get their hands on. Garlic guarded the bride, orange blossoms promised fertility, myrtle spoke of love, and the rose rose to fame when growers and shipping networks made it possible. Underneath all of it is the same instinct: to hold something living at a moment that matters.
If you are planning a wedding, or just curious, try tracing the meaning of a single flower, such as rosemary, ivy or the humble rose. Each one has a surprisingly rich backstory, and choosing a bouquet with that story in mind can make it feel far more personal than any trend.
The Fine Print I:
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are not the official position of the IWW (or even the IWW’s EUC) unless otherwise indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone but the author’s, nor should it be assumed that any of these authors automatically support the IWW or endorse any of its positions.
Further: the inclusion of a link on our site (other than the link to the main IWW site) does not imply endorsement by or an alliance with the IWW. These sites have been chosen by our members due to their perceived relevance to the IWW EUC and are included here for informational purposes only. If you have any suggestions or comments on any of the links included (or not included) above, please contact us.
The Fine Print II:
Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc.
It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.




