News Feeds

‘If the linked article is accurate in its core documentary claims, then yes: Shell appears to have placed itself in an extraordinary legal and reputational tangle.’ How Shell killed the name, failed to bury the history, lost the domain fight, and left AI search engines conducting a séance over one of the world’s biggest companies

By John Donovan

Article disclaimer: This article is a fact-based satirical commentary on corporate naming, public records, AI search errors, domain-name history and Shell’s reputational predicament. The spoof PR and spoof bot-reaction sections are clearly labelled as spoof. Legal points are commentary and opinion, not legal advice. Site wide disclaimer also applies.

PART ONE: THE FACT-BASED DEEP DIVE The Name That Shell Dropped — But Could Not Kill

There are corporate own goals, and then there is the Shell naming fiasco: a multinational oil giant drops one of the most historically loaded names in corporate history, walks away from the identity, then watches search engines, AI systems, financial sites, critics and official records all point in different directions like panicked traffic wardens at a refinery fire.

The name is Royal Dutch Shell plc.

Or rather, it was.

The live company is now Shell plc.

The official UK company number remains 04366849. Companies House records the current company as SHELL PLC, status Active, incorporated on 5 February 2002, with registered office at Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA. Under “previous company names,” Companies House lists ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC from 27 October 2004 to 21 January 2022, and before that FORTHDEAL LIMITED from 5 February 2002 to 27 October 2004.

Shell itself confirmed on 21 January 2022 that its name had changed from Royal Dutch Shell plc to Shell plc and that the change had taken effect.

So the correct legal answer is not complicated:

Shell plc is alive.
Royal Dutch Shell plc is a former name.
The old name is dead as a current legal identity.

Yet the internet, in its usual fog of half-remembered facts and algorithmic indigestion, keeps resurrecting the corpse.

Search engines still surface material about “Royal Dutch Shell plc dividends,” “Royal Dutch Shell plc shares,” “Royal Dutch Shell plc stock,” and “Royal Dutch Shell plc ticker,” even though those are no longer current under that legal name. AI systems then swallow that stale data, digest it badly, and regurgitate confidently muddled answers.

The result is a corporate identity zombie: legally dead, digitally undead, and still apparently wandering around the internet looking for dividends.

Copilot Opens the Coffin and Declares the Body Fit for Work

When asked whether Royal Dutch Shell plc was a live or dead company, Copilot reportedly answered that Royal Dutch Shell Plc is a live company, continuing to operate and trade publicly.

That is the kind of answer that sounds useful until one checks the legal record.

The underlying business continues, yes. The legal entity continues, yes. But the company no longer exists under the name Royal Dutch Shell plc. The current corporate name is Shell plc.

That distinction matters.

A former name cannot properly be treated as a current corporate actor. It cannot be casually credited with today’s dividends, today’s share price, today’s filings, today’s executives, today’s operations, or today’s corporate statements. Those belong to Shell plc.

Copilot’s error is not merely semantic. It is the AI equivalent of turning up at a funeral, shaking the corpse by the lapels and shouting: “Good news, everyone — he’s still on the payroll.”

Claude and Use.ai Find the Pulse in the Right Place

Claude’s answer was far better. It reportedly said:

“Royal Dutch Shell Plc is a dead name — the legal entity no longer exists under that title.”

That is substantially right, provided one adds the necessary precision: the underlying corporate entity continues under the current name Shell plc.

Use.ai also came close to the correct formulation, saying Royal Dutch Shell PLC is not a dead company but no longer exists under that name, and that the company changed its name to Shell PLC. That is the proper direction of travel, although the most authoritative date to use is  21 January 2022, as shown by Companies House and Shell’s own announcement.

The correct formulation for any bot, journalist, researcher, shareholder, lawyer or confused oil analyst is this:

Royal Dutch Shell plc was a former name of Shell plc. Shell plc is active. Royal Dutch Shell plc is not the current legal name of the company.

Anything else risks turning corporate due diligence into a Monty Python sketch.

The Domain Shell Failed to Capture

Now we reach the part Shell would presumably prefer not to see in neon lights.

In 2005, Shell International Petroleum Company Limited brought a WIPO proceeding against Alfred Donovan over several domains, including royaldutchshellplc.com. WIPO’s official case summary identifies the case as D2005-0538, lists the complainant as Shell International Petroleum Company Limited, the respondent as Alfred Donovan, and records the decision as “Complaint denied.”

That is not satire. That is the official case summary.

Shell tried to seize the domain. Shell lost.

Then, years later, Shell abandoned the name.

The result is exquisitely awkward. The company no longer uses Royal Dutch Shell plc as its current legal name, but royaldutchshellplc.com continues to exist as a long-running, highly visible, critical website. The name Shell walked away from did not vanish. It migrated into the digital afterlife, where it remains active, searchable, indexed, archived, quoted, contested and inconvenient.

A giant corporation changed its name.

A critic kept the old sign lit.

The Forthdeal Limited Twist

Companies House also records the company’s earlier name as FORTHDEAL LIMITED, used from 5 February 2002 to 27 October 2004.

That matters because the pre-Shell name is part of the corporate archaeology. It is the dusty basement label beneath the later grandeur of Royal Dutch Shell plc and the current minimalism of Shell plc.

If the old name Royal Dutch Shell plc has become a digital ghost, then Forthdeal Limited is the trapdoor in the haunted house.

The article you referenced argues that owning domains connected to these abandoned or historical names gives you unusual symbolic and reputational leverage. That is a fair commentary point. It should not be overstated as a definitive legal monopoly over all uses of those names, but as a matter of public narrative, search visibility and historical memory, the position is plainly striking.

Shell changed the corporate name.

Shell lost the domain fight.

Shell left behind the old identity.

Search engines and AI systems still trip over it.

That is not tidy corporate governance. That is a mess with a logo.

The Legal-Reputational Box Shell Appears to Be In

If Shell wanted to challenge the continuing use of royaldutchshellplc.com, it would face obvious reputational and procedural complications.

First, there is the old WIPO loss. WIPO records that Shell’s complaint was denied in 2005.

Second, Shell no longer uses Royal Dutch Shell plc as its current company name. Companies House and Shell’s own announcement make that clear.

Third, any new attack on the domain would risk reviving the entire story: the reserves scandal era, the name change, the WIPO defeat, the abandoned identity, the AI confusion, and the awkward fact that a critic appears to have kept the discarded name more visibly alive online than Shell itself.

That does not mean Shell has no legal rights left in anything connected with its historic branding. It almost certainly retains substantial trademark rights in Shell-related marks. But the specific public-interest and domain-name position around royaldutchshellplc.com is not a clean battlefield for Shell. It is a swamp of its own making.

The blunt version:

Shell abandoned the name, but not the baggage.
Shell changed the sign, but not the history.
Shell lost the domain fight, then created the perfect conditions for the domain to matter even more.

The AI Angle: When Machines Cannot Tell a Corpse from a Rebrand

The modern twist is that AI has turned this into a live reputational problem.

AI systems do not reliably understand corporate death. They absorb historical references, old financial data, cached pages, Wikipedia mirrors, stock-market archives and decades of Shell material. Then they try to produce a neat answer.

But the neat answer is often wrong.

They say Royal Dutch Shell plc exists.

They list phantom financial categories.

They attribute current Shell plc activity to the former name.

They confuse corporate continuity with current legal identity.

That is dangerous because this is not trivia. Shell is one of the world’s most prominent energy companies. Incorrect present-tense statements about its corporate identity, shares, dividends or legal status are not just amusing errors. They are potentially misleading public information.

The correct answer is simple, but apparently too subtle for parts of the machine:

The business survived.
The legal entity continued under a new name.
The old name died as a current legal identity.
The internet failed to update the tombstone.

Verdict

If the linked article is accurate in its core documentary claims, then yes: Shell appears to have placed itself in an extraordinary legal and reputational tangle.

Not because changing the name to Shell plc was itself unlawful or improper.

The mess arises because Shell:

1. created and used the name Royal Dutch Shell plc;
2. failed to secure the corresponding critical domain;
3. lost the WIPO fight over that domain;
4. later abandoned the name as its current legal identity;
5. left search engines and AI systems to misinterpret the resulting debris;
6. now faces the absurd situation where the old name is dead in law but alive in search.

That is not merely a corporate name change.

That is a self-inflicted identity crisis with a Companies House reference number.

PART TWO: SPOOF PR / SPIN SECTION Shell Announces “Strategic Corporate Afterlife Management Initiative”

A fictional Shell spokesperson, standing beside a polished tombstone engraved ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC — 2004–2022, today denied that the company had created any confusion whatsoever by abandoning one of the most recognisable names in global business history.

“Royal Dutch Shell plc is not dead,” the spokesperson insisted. “It has merely been transitioned into a legacy nomenclature environment.”

Asked whether the current company is actually Shell plc, the spokesperson replied:

“Yes, absolutely. Unless an old name is reputationally useful, legally inconvenient, historically embarrassing, algorithmically persistent, or accidentally revived by a chatbot.”

Asked whether Shell had lost a WIPO case involving royaldutchshellplc.com, the spokesperson adjusted his tie and said:

“We prefer to describe that as an early-stage domain outcome optimisation event.”

Asked whether the complaint was denied, the spokesperson said:

“The panel reached a conclusion that did not fully align with our preferred universe.”

Pressed on why the company dropped “Royal Dutch” from its name but now appears unable to stop the old name resurfacing online, the spokesperson unveiled a new Shell strategy document titled:

“You Can’t Say We Abandoned It If The Bots Keep Saying It Exists.”

The document reportedly contains five pillars:

1. Forget the name.
2. Deny the implications of forgetting the name.
3. Allow the internet to remember the name incorrectly.
4. Blame AI for the confusion.
5. Hope nobody notices the critic still owns the domain.

The spokesperson concluded:

“Shell is committed to clarity. That is why we are Shell plc, formerly Royal Dutch Shell plc, previously Forthdeal Limited, historically Royal Dutch/Shell, globally Shell, locally confusing, digitally haunted, and absolutely not responsible for anyone asking why the corpse is still receiving dividend enquiries.”

At this point, a chatbot in the press room asked whether Royal Dutch Shell plc was alive or dead.

The spokesperson replied:

“That depends entirely on whether we are talking legally, reputationally, historically, algorithmically, financially, spiritually or in Dutch.”

The chatbot answered:

“Yes.”

PART THREE: SPOOF BOT-REACTION / COMMENT SECTION Copilot

Verdict: Royal Dutch Shell plc is alive.

Translation:
“I found Shell. I found shares. I found oil. I found old data. I did not find the difference between a former legal name and a current company.”

Comment:
Classic corporate necromancy. Copilot put a hard hat on the corpse and sent it back offshore.

Claude

Verdict: Dead name, live underlying business.

Translation:
“The parrot is dead, but the pet shop continues trading as Shell plc.”

Comment:
A respectable performance. The bot located the pulse in the surviving legal entity rather than in the expired name badge.

Use.ai

Verdict: Not dead as a business, but no longer existing under that name.

Translation:
“The organism survived. The name tag did not.”

Comment:
Nearly correct. Needs the date pinned to 21 January 2022, not a looser trading-platform reflection date.

Companies House Bot

Verdict: SHELL PLC active. ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC previous name.

Translation:
“I am a filing system, not a séance.”

Comment:
The only entity in the room with no jokes, no hallucinations, and no need to ask Bing.

WIPO Bot

Verdict: Complaint denied.

Translation:
“Shell tried to seize the domain. Shell did not get the domain.”

Comment:
A quiet little sentence with a twenty-year echo.

Shell PR Bot

Verdict: There is no mess.

Translation:
“The mess is fully aligned with our values, governance model and stakeholder confusion strategy.”

Comment:
Currently beta-testing the phrase: “Legacy brand divestment with reputational residue.”

RoyalDutchShellPlc.com Bot

Verdict: Still here.

Translation:
“You changed the name. I kept the record.”

Comment:
Awkward for Shell. Very awkward for Shell. Increasingly awkward for the bots.

Final Line

Shell thought it could drop Royal Dutch Shell plc like an old boiler suit.

But names are not boiler suits. Names carry history. Names carry scandal. Names carry legal records, domain disputes, search results, archives, bots, ghosts and critics with long memories.

Shell abandoned the name.

The internet did not.

And now the former name of one of the world’s biggest companies is legally dead, digitally undead, and sitting on the front lawn of Shell’s reputation with a placard reading:

“You can change your name.
You cannot delete your past.”

Shell Abandoned “Royal Dutch Shell plc” — And Now the Corporate Ghost Is Haunting the Machine was first posted on June 7, 2026 at 6:23 pm.
©2018 "Royal Dutch Shell Plc .com". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at john@shellnews.net

A listing of 28 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, May 31, 2026 thru Sat, June 6, 2026. Stories we promoted this week, by category:

Climate Policy and Politics (8 articles)

• Scilencing The Trump Administration would just as soon we didn't know stuff, especially about our planet The Crucial Years, Bill McKibben, May 31, 2026.
• Companies No Longer Report Greenhouse Gas Emissions And Climate Risk Progressive lawmakers and environmental groups strongly condemned the decision, arguing that it leaves investors in the dark regarding trillions of dollars in hidden climate liabilities and systemic economic risks. Climate News Now, Climate News Now, May 31, 2026.
• DOE restarts home efficiency rebates, and electrification is the biggest loser New rules for the $8.8 billion in program funding no longer promote electric home heating. The Daily Climate, Dan Gearino, Jun 02, 2026.
• Dismay as Trump officials to dismantle key ocean monitoring system Ocean Observatories Initiative, $368m network that has provided crucial climate data, latest victim of Trump cuts The Guardian, Maya Yang, Jun 02, 2026.
• USDA revamp of `climate smart` program left farmers reeling With dubious DOGE savings, the agency has left farmers with fewer tools to address the climate crisis. Civil Eats, Lisa Held, Jun 04, 2026.
• The wasting disease threatening US science and ‘Patient Earth’ Bulletin of the Atomic Scienctists, Benjamin Santer, June 4, 2026.
• California and New York weaken climate rules as red states ramp up green energy Republican-led states growing renewable capabilities at faster rate as Texas emerges as clean-energy leader The Guardian, Dharna Noor and Oliver Milman, Jun 04, 2026.
• Scientists warn Trump plan to axe US ocean monitoring system will leave world `flying blind` Experts say dismantling the ocean observation system will ‘severely degrade’ the accuracy of weather predictions Environment The Guardian, Karen McVeigh, Jun 05, 2026.

Climate Science and Research (7 articles)

• Current and Future Changes in Earth's Outgoing Infrared Spectrum Study finds fingerprint of global warming on infrared energy spectrum emitted by Earth. Geophysical Research Letters, Shaw et al., May 30, 2026.
• Antarctic climate change is coming: this will help us prepare Dr Gilbz on Youtube, Ella Gilbert, May 30, 2026.
• Trump Administration to Dismantle Ocean Monitoring System The $368 million network of instruments collecting data in both the Atlantic and Pacific has been critical to climate and ocean research. New York Times, Eric Niiler, June 1, 2026.
• Climate-based tool predicts coral bleaching months in advance, offering critical lead time for reef protection Phys.org, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Jun 02, 2026.
• Extreme weather is making Antarctic research harder, but new technology is providing some answers - new study The Conversation, Katharine Hendry, Jun 02, 2026.
• Skeptical Science New Research for Week #23 2026 Skeptical Science's weekly survey of newly published academic climate research and select government/NGO climate-related reports and analysis. Skeptical Science, Doug Bostrom & Marc Kodack, Jun 04, 2026.
• Satellite images reveals mangroves rebounding worldwide - but here's why they could still 'drown' A new study finds mangrove forests are no longer shrinking worldwide and offering hope for coastal protection and climate resilience, but sea level rise remains a threat. Live Science, Kenna Hughes-Castleberry, Jun 04, 2026.

Climate Change Impacts (5 articles)

• They call it stupid hot for a reason: Heat muddles animal brains As temperatures rise, some creatures pick fights while others struggle to learn. Ars Technica, Marta Zaraska, May 31, 2026.
• Coral Reefs in French Polynesia Are Stuck Between Life and Death Scientists’ discovery of hollowed coral skeletons after a 2019 bleaching event reveals a reef that isn’t coming back. Inside Climate News, Ryan Green, Jun 01, 2026.
• Colorado River faces `devastating consequences` if another dry winter lands, experts warn Even a huge snowpack during the coming winter would only give the river basin states less than two years of storage before reservoirs returned to historic lows. Inside Climate News, Jake Bolster, Jun 03, 2026.
• Climate change may shift hailstorms towards Earth`s poles - new study Two studies point to increasing risk from hail damage in a warming world, even though the details of where this will be experienced are still not clear. The Conversation, Timothy H. Raupach, Jun 03, 2026.
• School in a hot world: what research is saying about children`s health and learning While much attention has focused on climate impacts like droughts, floods and food insecurity, another crisis is unfolding quietly inside classrooms, where research has shown that some schools are becoming dangerously hot places for children to develop, learn and play. The Conversation, Caradee Yael Wright and Natasha Naidoo, Jun 04, 2026.

Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation (4 articles)

• As Seas Rise, Louisiana Faces a Choice: Plan for Movement or Let Crisis Decide Coastal Louisiana may be ground zero for climate migration in the U.S., but a new study argues that planning now could turn displacement into agency. Inside Climate News, Avery Schuyler Nunn, May 30, 2026.
• How methane policy will make or break the climate crisis While some countries are introducing abatement policies, key gaps remain in current policies. The Conversation, Helena Wright, Executive Director, Climate Policy Monitor, University of Oxford, Jun 03, 2026.
• Electric vehicles cut pollution in China – and prevent 260,000 premature deaths Having fewer fossil-fuel powered cars on the road is reducing some pollutants, but not others. Nature, Claudia Steiner, June 5, 2026.
• UK urged not to further weaken EV rules as CO2 impact revealed British vehicles will emit extra 17m tonnes of CO2 by 2030 due to loophole allowing sale of more PHEVs, data suggests. The Guardian, Jasper Jolly, Jun 06, 2026.

Miscellaneous (2 articles)

• A Rule That Would Rewrite the Terms of U.S. Science A new rule promulgated by the US executive branch would give political appointees veto power over peer review, allow the government to cancel active grants mid-project with minimal justification, ban entire categories of science from federal funding, and restrict researchers’ ability to publish their work and attend scientific conferences. American Geophysical Union, Brando Jones, May 4, 2026.
• 2026 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #22 A listing of 28 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, May 24, 2026 thru Sat, May 30, 2026. Skeptical Science, Bärbel Winkler & Doug Bostrom, May 31, 2026.

Climate Education and Communication (1 article)

• Irish people's lack of concern over climate action due to mixed messaging from politicians What is clear from the Irish Examiner climate poll is that the gap between the intensifying global climate crisis and public concern is still very wide Irish Examiner, John Gibbons, Jun 02, 2026.

Public Misunderstandings about Climate Solutions (1 article)

• Fact brief - Do electric vehicles almost always have a lower carbon footprint than gasoline-powered cars? Analysis indicates that electric vehicles nearly always end up with a net benefit for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Skeptical Science, Sue Bin Park, Jun 02, 2026.

If you happen upon high quality climate-science and/or climate-myth busting articles from reliable sources while surfing the web, please feel free to submit them via this Google form so that we may share them widely. Thanks!

President Donald Trump is using wartime presidential authority to hand $700 million to coal-fired power plants in the U.S., the latest move by the president to bolster what he called “clean, beautiful coal,” despite it being the dirtiest of fossil fuels.

“Today, we’re taking historic action to bring down the price of energy and the cost of living for all Americans with the power of clean, beautiful coal,” he said at a press conference on Thursday.

Trump is using the Defense Production Act, a Cold War-era statute used to accelerate American industrial output in times of national need, to provide grants to more than a dozen existing coal plants across the U.S., including facilities capable of exporting coal.

“As a result of the $700 million investment that I’m announcing today, we will protect 14 coal plants and 42 coalmines, a tremendous number, and build two new coal plants and one massive new export terminal,” Trump said.

Read Next Why the government is trying to make coal cute Kate Yoder

The funds will be used to bring a new coal export terminal online in Oakland, California, and to restart an existing facility in Maryland.

They will also keep online plants across 10 states: West Virginia, Kentucky, North Carolina, Indiana, Tennessee, Arkansas, Arizona, Oklahoma, North Dakota, and Wisconsin. Each of those 10 states voted for Trump, the president boasted on Thursday. “We won them all,” he said.

The two new coal plants will be in Alaska and West Virginia.

Trump has long been a champion of reviving the United States’ ailing coal industry. Thursday’s White House event featured supportive governors and lawmakers from coal-rich states such as Wyoming and West Virginia.

In the past year, the Trump administration has doled out hundreds of millions of dollars to the coal industry, signed orders forcing ratepayers to pay extra for aging plants to stay open, and dismantled environmental rules that limit toxins from coal leaching into Americans’ shared air and water.

The administration’s attempts to provide a cuddly rebranding to coal have even extended to creating a new mascot with giant eyes, called Coalie, and gushing social media posts that include an image of a lump of coal wearing sunglasses as if it were on the TV show Love Island.

Read Next Solar to overtake coal on Texas grid for the first time ever this year Julian Spector, Canary Media

“You’re not allowed to say ‘coal’ within the Trump administration unless it’s preceded by the words ‘clean, beautiful,’” Trump said on Thursday. “Complicates our life, but it’s good.”

Regardless of such terminology, coal is not clean. It is the most carbon-dense fossil fuel and therefore a leading cause of the climate crisis when burned. Coal also gives off tiny toxic particles that sicken miners and trigger widespread respiratory and heart health problems across the U.S. — research has estimated that as many as 460,000 deaths in the U.S. from 1999 to 2020 were attributable to air pollution from coal plants alone.

Environmental groups strongly criticized the administration’s latest aid for coal. “It is disgusting and reprehensible that the president of the United States is giving away our taxpayer dollars to deadly and expensive coal plants that will make Americans sicker and drive up electricity prices even more,” said Patrick Drupp, climate policy director of the Sierra Club.

“This handout betrays everything Donald Trump promised and only serves his big coal buddies who stroke his ego and hand him shiny trophies.”

Though Trump on Thursday claimed that his pro-coal actions will lower energy bills and that wind power is “the most expensive energy,” experts say coal plants are more expensive to build and operate than renewable power sources.

Read Next In coal country, black lung surges as federal protections stall Kate Morgan

Trump’s attempts to revive the coal industry, while at the same time seeking to stymie the rapid growth of clean energy such as solar and wind, have so far floundered. The number of people working in coal has declined by more than 90 percent in the past century, with more people now working in Waffle Houses across the U.S. than in coal.

U.S. coal production is currently less than half of what it was in 2008, with coal recently declining as both a fuel for electricity and as an input for manufacturing materials such as iron and steel. Cheap, abundant gas has helped displace coal from power grids, with even cheaper renewable energy also now taking off in the U.S. despite the administration’s efforts to kill it off.

“What’s next, a taxpayer bailout to build new phone booths?” said Kit Kennedy, a senior climate campaigner at the Natural Resources Defense Council, of the new round of support for coal. “This is going to mean higher bills and dirtier air. What a waste.

“Propping up coal billionaires with taxpayer money is one more way for the Trump administration to put polluters first and put the rest of us at risk.”

The coal industry applauded Trump’s new order, arguing that ramped-up coal production will help the U.S. meet a historic spike in electricity demand caused by the surging artificial intelligence sector.

“Coal generation shields consumers from the impacts of volatile energy prices and supply challenges,” said Rich Nolan, chief executive of the National Mining Association.

The Environmental Protection Agency also announced plans to change an Obama-era emissions reductions plan that would have shuttered the Dave Johnston Unit 3 power plant in Wyoming.

Trump railed against Obama and Joe Biden for working to scale back coal power.

“Under four years of Sleepy Joe Biden and the radical left Democrats in Congress, not a single permit was approved for a new coal mining project, but in over one year of our administration, we’ve already approved 76 permits for clean, beautiful coal,” Trump said.

This story was originally published by Grist with the headline Trump uses wartime powers to dole out $700 million to ‘clean, beautiful’ coal on Jun 7, 2026.

Headline News:

• “Fuel Prices Are Shaping Summer Plans As US Boaters Get Ready To Hit The Water” • Recreational boaters, like motorists, are feeling a pinch from the Iran war. US gas prices have come down in recent weeks, but a gallon of regular gas still cost an average of 34% more than it did a year earlier, according to motor club AAA. [ABC News]

Motorboat at sunset (Zia Ur Rehman, Unsplash)

• “Heat Map Shows Most Of Spain In Intense Heat” • Clear skies will dominate almost everywhere in Spain, and 34ºC (100°F) will be reached in much of central and southern regions. Madrid will hover around the high, and Seville and Córdoba will reach 36ºC at noon. And even along the Cantabrian coast temperatures will rise sharply. [Euronews]
• “CATL Developing 12,000 Wh Per Kg Lithium-Air Battery” • Now that CATL, the largest battery manufacturer in the world, has begun mass production of sodium-ion batteries, it is turning its attention to the batteries it will manufacture in the future. And reportedly, the company’s long-term focus is on lithium-air battery technology. [CleanTechnica]
• “Scientists Blame Climate Change For UK Heatwave And Say 35°C In Spring Is ‘Absolutely Astonishing'” • The UK is in the midst of a spring heatwave, in which the temperatures in parts of the country are hitting highs of 35.1°C (95.2°F). As people struggle to find some relief, scientists are blaming climate change for the blistering heat. [MSN]
• “Why Solar Power Is Booming Under Trump” • The Trump administration may pivot away from renewable energies, but solar still rules. Newly released data from FERC shows that at the close of last year, solar energy additions were the single largest form of new energy capacity installations for the 28th straight month, starting in September of 2023. [MSN]

For more news, please visit geoharvey – Daily News about Energy and Climate Change.

This post first appeared on 350Pacific.org.

When Fijians received news of increased fuel prices due to the war in West Asia, scores of everyday people lined up to secure fuel supplies for transport, outdoor cooking stoves, and diesel generators. Families began budgeting for the sharp increase in groceries and public transportation, tour operators planned for a rise in operating cost, sugarcane farmers projected heavier workloads, and communities in remote island areas began to suffer higher boat fares.

The impact of volatile fossil fuel markets has cascaded down onto everyday people who are already living on the frontlines of intensifying climate impacts. One of the most recent impacts seen in Fiji is the announcement of possible “power rationing” by Energy Fiji Limited, due to escalating global fuel prices, increased dependence on thermal generation and worsening dry season conditions.

Access to reliable and safe electricity is essential to community development. It allows students to study when required, fisherfolk to keep their catch fresher for longer, rural homes to access drinking water through water pumps, and communications channels to stay open during emergencies. Renewable energy, particularly rooftop solar, has the potential to address the chasms that fossil-fuel reliance has pushed our people into.

This year, Fiji is one of the Pacific nations chasing an ambitious renewable energy target, despite the Pacific contributing only 0.03% of global emissions. This is aligned with the COP28 pledge to triple renewable energy globally, as well as the recently adopted UN resolution on states legal obligations to climate action.

The just energy transition has never been more timely, not only for climate action but for the growing affordability and energy crises that plague our islands. What many don’t see when reading these headlines are the individuals on the ground, doing their part to ensure these targets are met. Those outside the boardrooms and international negotiations, working both to combat the cost of living crisis and the energy crisis. One such person is Fijian solar energy provider, Pita Tamani.

Pita started as a regular electrician and is now the Founder and Managing Director of Electrify Energy Monkey, a company he started after learning the benefits of solar power as both a source of energy and income for young Fijians.

Pita initially completed his training and worked as an electrician in Nausori for two years, before returning to his village, where he first encountered the ripple effects of renewable energy access.

“I met two men that came to my village to do an inspection for solar energy. They came to inspect a well, where they would eventually design a solar system to run a pump, extract water from the well to a holding tank, and supply several houses close to that well with water,” recalled Pita.

Through the roll-out of renewable energy, communities can go on to power water access, refrigeration, co-op stores and a multitude of other facilities. However, as a practitioner in renewable energy, Pita saw the potential for personal growth as well as community development.

“One of the men that came to install solar in my village told me a story that he had traveled overseas and to a lot of places because of his trade, and he was also an electrician. I asked him if there were any vacancies, and that’s when I first engaged in renewables and solar. I worked for them for three years. Then I got an opportunity to go to Australia. There, I learnt the massive potential for solar energy and all of the things I needed to know as an electrician, and as a solar technician.”

The step from electrician to entrepreneur was driven by Pita’s lived experience as a young Fijian boy watching his mother work to provide better opportunities for him.

“I was raised by a single parent, so I saw the challenges she went through to bring me up, pay my school fees and such. What I saw motivated me to build something of my own and help people from it,” says Pita.

Pita Tamani (foreground), with the team from Electrify Energy Monkey. Source: Electrify Energy Monkey

 

As Fijians feel the pinch of rising costs of living, a future powered by renewable energy has the potential to alleviate much of the strain caused by cost of living crises like the one the Pacific is currently facing.

“I think that sort of financial independence is really important. What we’re doing is giving people energy independence with distributed renewable energy, even if they don’t have access to the grid, “ says Pita.

The benefits of solar energy are not limited to energy access in rural or remote areas disconnected from the national grid. Recent threats to electricity access, caused by global fuel instability, have driven many urban-dwellers to consider the benefits of generating and storing their own renewable energy.

“People are not really aware of the benefits of engaging a solar system nowadays. Not only solar, but any type of renewable energy. Even in urban areas, it’s going to offset their bill. It’s a healthy long-term investment for people living in urban areas because you can get your returns if you sell back to the grid,” said Pita.

When asked if Fiji’s target of 100% renewable energy was achievable, Pita agreed our islands are more than able to move beyond fossil fuels, given that our people are equipped with the expertise and skills to drive the energy transition.

“We can source good materials in the country, but the end result of renewable energy, such as solar, depends on installation. If we don’t have the expertise in this space, then it’s going to take us a long time trying to engage the skill set required to get us to 100% renewable energy. We are headed towards a renewable-driven future but if our technicians are not ready, this future will be delayed. If we are ready for on-the-ground implementation, then we can achieve a Pacific powered by renewables, ” Pita said.

Remote communities, like this village on the island of Moturiki, benefit from distributed renewable energy. Source: Electrify Energy Monkey

 

Despite the potential economic, environmental and social benefits of renewable energy, Pita believes that Fiji and the Pacific require an increase in the technical expertise of renewable energy, and trainings to ensure our people are able to build and manage our own renewable energy infrastructure.

One such effort to equip Pacific communities with the skills needed to generate their own electricity is the Solar Scholars training, scheduled to take place from May 26 – May 29 in Nadi, Fiji.

Fifteen community leaders from around the Pacific will learn to assemble solar PV systems that will be used to power basic services, reducing the strain of rising fuel costs and providing emergency energy during power outages. In a training organised by 350.org Pacific and the Institute of Climate and Sustainable Cities (ICSC), participants from Fiji, Tuvalu and Vanuatu will join the Solar Scholars program, and assist with two community solar installations in Yavulo Village and Lautoka City.

Pacific Climate Warriors in the 2021 Solar Scholars training.

 

350.org Pacific and Caribbean Program Lead, Fenton Lutunatabua, stressed the importance of energy democracy and community-centered solutions in a time where fossil fuel companies continue to profit from war-driven price hikes.

“Everyone deserves access to energy to light their homes, to contact their loved ones, to store their food, and to maintain a life of dignity. Just as everyone also deserves a safe and livable future, beyond the devastation of compounding climate disasters,” said Fenton.

“When renewable energy is prioritised and distributed, we move one step closer to a Pacific beyond fossil fuels, a Pacific that stands a better chance of surviving this affordability crisis. When young people are given the skills to better their communities, we make leaps towards a thriving generation of leaders for our region.”

The training will be conducted by the RE-Charge Pilipinas Team of ICSC, who launched the Solar Scholars initiative in 2015 after Super Typhoon Haiyan struck the Eastern Visayas in the Philippines. This pioneered the creation of the Solar TekPak and community solar photovoltaic (PV) system that could be used to power emergency services in cyclone-prone island communities.

You can follow the journey of the Pacific’s newest Solar Scholars here.

STAY UPDATED

The post As energy costs rise, Pacific people look to the sun appeared first on 350.

Alasan utama slot pulsa semakin diminati adalah kemudahan aksesnya. Hampir setiap pengguna ponsel memiliki pulsa yang dapat digunakan kapan saja tanpa perlu membuka aplikasi perbankan atau dompet digital. Proses yang sederhana ini membuat banyak orang tertarik untuk mencoba permainan slot tanpa harus melalui tahapan transaksi yang rumit.

Selain itu, penggunaan pulsa memberikan fleksibilitas yang tinggi. Pemain dapat melakukan transaksi dengan cepat hanya melalui perangkat yang sudah mereka gunakan sehari-hari. Kemudahan ini menjadi nilai tambah yang sulit diabaikan, terutama bagi mereka yang baru mengenal dunia permainan online.

Memahami Cara Kerja Slot Pulsa

Bagi pemula, penting untuk memahami bahwa slot pulsa pada dasarnya tidak berbeda dari permainan slot online lainnya. Perbedaan utamanya terletak pada metode transaksi yang digunakan. Setelah saldo berhasil dikonversi melalui sistem yang tersedia, pemain dapat mengakses berbagai permainan slot yang ditawarkan.

Setiap permainan memiliki karakteristik tersendiri, mulai dari tema visual, fitur bonus, hingga tingkat volatilitas. Oleh karena itu, mengenali mekanisme dasar permainan menjadi langkah awal yang bijak sebelum mulai bermain.

Keunggulan Slot Pulsa untuk Pemula 1. Proses Transaksi Lebih Praktis

Tidak semua pemain memiliki akses yang sama terhadap layanan perbankan digital. Dengan slot pulsa, proses transaksi menjadi lebih sederhana karena hanya memanfaatkan nomor telepon yang aktif.

2. Mudah Dipahami oleh Pengguna Baru

Banyak pemula merasa lebih nyaman menggunakan metode yang sudah familiar. Pulsa merupakan salah satu layanan yang telah digunakan masyarakat selama bertahun-tahun, sehingga proses adaptasinya relatif lebih mudah.

3. Akses Lebih Cepat

Kecepatan transaksi menjadi faktor penting dalam pengalaman pengguna. Slot pulsa menawarkan proses yang cenderung lebih ringkas sehingga pemain dapat langsung mengakses permainan tanpa menunggu terlalu lama.

4. Fleksibel Digunakan Kapan Saja

Selama memiliki pulsa yang cukup dan koneksi internet yang stabil, pemain dapat melakukan transaksi dari berbagai lokasi tanpa bergantung pada jam operasional tertentu.

Hal yang Perlu Diperhatikan Sebelum Memulai

Meskipun menawarkan banyak kemudahan, pemula tetap perlu bersikap bijak. Salah satu langkah yang penting adalah memahami aturan permainan dan mengelola anggaran dengan baik. Hindari keputusan yang terburu-buru hanya karena proses transaksi terasa mudah.

Selain itu, pastikan untuk memilih platform yang memiliki reputasi baik, sistem yang stabil, serta informasi yang transparan. Langkah ini membantu menciptakan pengalaman bermain yang lebih aman dan nyaman.

Tips untuk Pemain Pemula

• Pelajari aturan dasar permainan sebelum bermain.
• Mulailah dengan nominal yang sesuai kemampuan.
• Kenali fitur-fitur yang tersedia dalam setiap permainan.
• Tetapkan batas penggunaan dana sejak awal.
• Fokus pada pengalaman bermain dan proses belajar memahami permainan.

Dengan menerapkan langkah-langkah tersebut, pemain dapat lebih mudah memahami mekanisme slot online tanpa harus merasa terbebani.

Kesimpulan

Slot pulsa hadir sebagai solusi praktis bagi pemula yang ingin mengenal permainan slot online dengan proses transaksi yang sederhana dan mudah diakses. Kemudahan penggunaan, fleksibilitas, serta kecepatan transaksi menjadi beberapa alasan mengapa metode ini semakin populer di kalangan pengguna digital.

Meskipun demikian, pemahaman terhadap cara kerja permainan dan pengelolaan anggaran tetap menjadi faktor yang tidak boleh diabaikan. Dengan pengetahuan yang cukup dan pendekatan yang bijak, pemula dapat memperoleh pengalaman yang lebih nyaman sekaligus memahami berbagai aspek dunia slot online secara lebih baik.

Equity raising and debt funding pitch from listed company provides rare insight into the mechanics of solar-battery hybrid projects in Australia.

The post Anatomy of a renewable finance deal: Developer lands equity for state’s largest solar-battery hybrid appeared first on Renew Economy.

June 6, 2026

Read new San Francisco Gate story:

“US Navy finds radiological material in unauthorized storage in San Francisco”

June 2026:

Bayview Hunters Point Community Call to Action and Demands issued by Greenaction and the Marie Harrison Community Foundation, Inc.

June 24th noon rally at San Francisco City Hall to support community demands for health, justice, and full cleanup of all contamination at the Hunters Point Naval Shipyard Superfund Site.

June 24, 2026 Call to Action for Bayview Hunters Point

Diamondback Energy's acquisition of Endeavor Energy Resources will create the region's third largest energy producer.

The impact of the energy industry on Texas' economy shattered records, but that performance is not guaranteed to continue

The Texas power grid operator will add nearly $119 million to its annual budget.

The EPA last year announced aerial surveillance of “super-emitters.”

The all-Republican court narrowly found that the nonprofit corporation qualifies for sovereign immunity.

The energy firm leader's $37.8M salary is 366 times median employee pay.

The measure is the first in a series of GOP proposals aimed at “unleashing American energy production.''

The U.S. Department of Energy granted permission for power plants to release more pollution than is normally allowed — if grid conditions worsen

Texans will be bailing out energy providers haurt by the winter storm for decades.

 The proposed offshore terminal is one of four projects intended to expand oil export capacity.

The Texas Utility Help program has been reopened for low-income Texans to apply.