You are here
News Feeds
The Fight Over Toxic Mining Returns to Minnesota’s Boundary Waters
How One Vermont Forester Brought a 175-Acre Woodland Back to Life
Working groups begin drafting Deep Geothermal Roadmap
The Deep Geothermal Roadmap consultative session has now begun, and the Canadian Deep Geothermal Coalition is meeting and working with representatives of industry, government, and Indigenous groups to develop a strategy for launching geothermal energy in Canada.
The Canadian Deep Geothermal Coalition, with the Cascade Institute acting as Secretariat, is developing this first-ever roadmap for geothermal development in Canada with funding support from Natural Resources Canada.
The Coalition seeks to create the conditions for Canada to develop geothermal projects at home and compete in a rapidly growing global market. To realize this, the Coalition will conduct an in-depth analysis of the most pressing challenges and opportunities. To do this, four working groups will address the following areas:
- Technology: Working group members will provide an overview of technology available to optimize geothermal energy extraction, and identify priorities for R&D, including drilling innovation, surface technologies, and reservoir characterization.
- Finance: This working group will assess how to improve the bankability of projects, reducing financial risks for both private and public investors. The working group will assess existing Canadian financing structures and risk-sharing mechanisms as well as successful international examples.
- Communities: This working group will identify how geothermal projects can earn social support and deliver direct-use benefits for Canadian communities. It will lead Indigenous engagement, co-ownership, and benefit-sharing approaches, and address environmental risks—including water use and induced seismicity—that affect social license.
- Competitiveness: Participants in this working group will identify the market segments and regional strengths Canadian companies should prioritize, including opportunities for Indigenous collaboration. It will also address intellectual property considerations and assess Canada’s regulatory readiness for geothermal development.
The Canadian Deep Geothermal Coalition is grateful to all the industry experts, company leaders, geothermal advocates, and Indigenous leaders who have generously volunteered their time to help shape this document, and shape the future of geothermal in Canada.
Alongside this project, the Canadian Deep Geothermal Coalition will be working with outside organizations to undertake:
- A Global Market Assessment that will estimate the total emerging geothermal market. This market is rapidly expanding as firms and nations rush to electrify the supply of clean, reliable power needed to electrify existing industries and support new industries, such as AI.
- A Canadian Deployment Study will assess the role of geothermal energy in Canada’s energy future. By simulating how geothermal is adopted in Canada’s energy systems, we can understand how it can help to reduce energy prices, boost GDP and productivity, and mitigate climate change.
- A Supply Chain Analysis will assess Canada’s readiness to lead in geothermal development and expertise. The study will develop a detailed inventory of Canada’s globally competitive oil and gas sector to identify where Canada is best positioned to leverage those strengths to lead in rapidly growing geothermal markets.
“This Roadmap will be a geothermal strategy—built for Canada, by Canadians,” said Emily Smejkal, Policy Lead with the Cascade Institute. “It will centre Canadian expertise and challenges, with participation from industry, government, and Indigenous Peoples.”
The Canadian Deep Geothermal Coalition aims to deliver the full roadmap by the end of 2027.
The Canadian Deep Geothermal Coalition, launched in 2025, includes industry, Indigenous organizations, communities, academia, government, and other stakeholders. The Canadian Deep Geothermal Coalition, with the Cascade Institute acting as Secretariat, will lead the development of the roadmap.
For more information on the Roadmap or Cascade’s work in support of it or to arrange interviews, please contact Jax Jacobsen at jax@cascadeinstitute.org.
The post Working groups begin drafting Deep Geothermal Roadmap appeared first on Cascade Institute.Film About the Hermits Peak/Calf Canyon Fire at the Santa Fe Film Festival
Announcing our New Mexico premiere!
Dear friends,
After learning this weekend that burn, scar took home the “Best Documentary Feature” award at the Kansas City International Film Festival, we’re back with even more good news– burn, scar will have its New Mexico premiere at the Santa Fe International Film Festival on October 15th!
Tickets will go on sale 9/25 here; get yours before they’re gone!
We’ll be releasing a trailer for the film & announcing more local screenings in the next couple of weeks as well– stay tuned!
With deep appreciation and anticipation,
Hillary + the burn, scar team
UN backs push to upgrade grids slowing clean power uptake in Africa and SE Asia
The UN has rallied behind plans to accelerate investment in electricity infrastructure in Africa and Southeast Asia, boosting efforts to tackle one of the biggest bottlenecks holding back the shift to clean energy.
UN boss António Guterres launched the Global Grids Accelerator on the sidelines of the UN Climate Summit in New York on Wednesday. The initiative aims to turn government plans to expand and modernise grids into investment-ready projects and bring together the expertise, finance and support needed to build them.
Guterres said the accelerator will help countries build “the arteries of the energy transition” to expand energy access, strengthen energy security and power growth in developing countries.
The initiative will not create a new financing institution, the UN said, and no additional funding to boost grid upgrades was announced. Instead, it will act as a broker by bringing together UN agencies, development banks, investors and utilities around grid priorities identified by governments.
Renewable energy deployment is happening at record speed but the infrastructure required to move clean electricity from where it is generated to consumers is not keeping pace. As a result, record amounts of green electricity that cannot be absorbed by the grid are being wasted.
In addition, more than 2,500 GW of renewable projects – nearly twice the electricity generation capacity of the US – are currently stuck in queues worldwide, waiting to connect to the grid, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA).
Grid bottlenecksTo meet global climate goals and cut emissions from fossil fuels, electricity demand needs to grow orders of magnitude faster in the next decade than it did in the last. The COP31 presidency has called on governments to endorse a pledge to raise electricity’s share of final energy consumption from 23% today to 35% by 2035.
Grids are essential to support this surge in electricity demand as sectors such as transport, heating and cooling electrify.
The lack of adequate infrastructure to transport electricity can have a major negative impact on economic development by delaying new power generation, slowing down efforts to expand access to electricity and hampering industrial growth.
In contrast, strong grids can help countries connect their renewable energy potential to surging power demand, strengthen energy security and support new industries and job creation.
Electricity pylons in Kibuye, Rwanda (Photo by Luke Dray/Getty Images)Meeting national climate goals requires adding or refurbishing more than 80 million kilometres of grids by 2040 – equivalent to roughly the size of today’s entire global network, according to the IEA. Technologies can also help increase the capacity of existing grid infrastructure. The watchdog estimates that annual grid investments need to increase by around 50% by 2030 to meet growing electricity demand.
The IEA has warned that the mismatch between the time it takes to build new power grids – 5 to 15 years – and the much faster buildout of renewable projects, EV charging infrastructure or data centres, makes upgrading grids an urgent task to prevent slowing down the energy transition.
Matching expertise and finance to projectsAt COP29 in 2024, more than 60 countries committed to collectively build more than 25 million kilometres of additional grid infrastructure by 2030.
But a key barrier is turning long-term and often complex plans to overhaul electricity infrastructure into viable projects that can be matched to funding.
The accelerator aims to bring together expertise from across the UN system to support countries navigate this fragmented landscape and access the financing they need.
In Africa, the accelerator will focus on delivering national priorities to expand grid infrastructure and regional interconnections to expand access to reliable and affordable electricity. It will build on existing initiatives such as Mission 300, which aims to connect 300 million Africans to electricity by 2030.
In Southeast Asia, the accelerator will support initiatives such as the ASEAN Power Grid, which aims to connect different countries’ electricity networks and enable cross-border power trading to meet growing power demand and boost energy security.
Across the region, inadequate grids are threatening billions of dollars in clean energy investment. The lack of grid capacity is part of the reason about 50% to 60% of renewable energy projects in Vietnam, Thailand and Indonesia were cancelled or stalled between 2021 and 2025.
Alexander De Croo, the administrator of UNDP, said making grids projects investable must be a priority, noting that grids require a big upfront investment but deliver “a stable return over the long-term”.
The post UN backs push to upgrade grids slowing clean power uptake in Africa and SE Asia appeared first on Climate Home News.
New map tracks $25.9 million in NPS projects blocked by Trump administration
The Interior department is blocking 133 National Park Service agreements with outside partners, holding up $25.9 million in funding for parks. These blocked agreements are available to view in a new interactive map from the Center for Western Priorities. Each agreement on the map lists the park or office that requested it, the partner that would have done the work, the dollar amount, and the National Park Service’s own written statement of what disapproval means for that site.
Interior disapproved 140 agreements on August 7 at 61 parks, offices, and programs in all seven National Park Service regions, as the Washington Post reported earlier this month. A handful have since been appealed, and 133 remain disapproved. The work they would have funded includes fire preparedness, hazardous tree removal, archaeological surveys, endangered species recovery, trail crews, and seasonal staffing.
Parks and their partners had already secured the money through congressional appropriations, existing federal programs, and internal funding. Interior’s review was the final step before the agreements could be signed and the money released. Interior told the Washington Post it had disapproved agreements with groups “actively working against the best interests of the American people and the priorities of this administration.” NPS staff reported they received no explanation beyond a note in the records reading “Disapproved by DOI.”
“Every one of these projects had its funding secured, and parks were counting on the work getting done. Blocking these agreements did not save a dollar. It pushed the work down the road and likely made it even more costly in the future,” said Kate Groetzinger, Center for Western Priorities communications director. “At Joshua Tree, for example, national park staff wrote that without approval for their projects, wildfires there will be larger and cost more to fight.”
Interior plans National Park Service overhaulThe Interior department’s reorganization of the National Park Service could begin rolling out in phases before the end of the year, according to internal draft documents viewed by Politico and previously reported on by the Washington Sun. The plan would reorganize parks into “hubs,” with senior officials overseeing construction, visitor services, cultural resources, and science for surrounding “spoke” parks. Leaked documents released by Wes Siler‘s Newsletter earlier this week show it would eliminate the agency’s seven regional directors and roughly 1,100 management positions. The draft documents say the changes will not require layoffs “at least in the short term.”
Quick hits Two decades of travel management decisions on verge of reversalGrist | Mountain Journal | More Than Just Parks [map]
Two pilots killed in helicopter crash while fighting Yosemite wildfireNew York Times | Wildfire Today | The Guardian | Fox Weather | ABC30
Inside the long and deliberate collapse of America’s public land funding Nevada is suing over Colorado River regulations. There could be impacts for Colorado Scientists link fossil fuel producers to the West’s worsening water shortages US judge declines to block transfer of wildlife refuge land to SpaceX Opinion: It’s time to engage Poll shows majority of Arizonans are against eliminating national monument lands Quote of the dayThe budgets that are being put forward, along with the DOGEing that happened to our public land employees — that is being done to break the agencies. These aren’t normal cuts. These are drastic cuts.”
—Land Tawney, co-chair of American Hunters & Anglers, Outdoor Life
Picture This@nationalparkservice
It’s fall y’all!
The leaves are changing, temperatures are cooling (not for everyone, we know), and somewhere in the distance, you can already hear the faint, unmistakable strains of Mariah Carey’s “All I Want for Christmas” being defrosted from its annual cryogenic chamber.
Wait. Hold up. Give fall its due! As of today, in fact. It’s the official first day of fall, otherwise known as the autumnal equinox, the yearly occasion when humanity briefly remembers that the Earth is, in fact, tilted.
Fall is a great time to experience our national parks. The trees put on a spectacular display of color, the air gets crisp, and Fat Bear Week kicks off, giving us the rare opportunity to celebrate bears for doing what bears do best: eating an alarming amount of food and preparing for winter.
Not a fan of fall? That’s okay. Just three months until winter.
NPS Photos
Featured photo: Disapproved National Park Service agreements interactive map, Center for Western Priorities
The post New map tracks $25.9 million in NPS projects blocked by Trump administration appeared first on Center for Western Priorities.
Flagrant Foul Called Against Polluters and State Officials Pushing Secretive Data Centers, Pipelines – and Power Plants — NC WARN News Release
NC Governor Stein must stop the backroom scheming and lead a moratorium on data centers
NC WARN is calling a flagrant foul against corporate polluters – and state officials – for their use of persistent secrecy and deception in the targeting of communities across North Carolina for noxious data centers and fracked-gas pipelines.
Across the state, data center developers and Duke Energy continue using various tools of secrecy and influence to gain support from local leaders for unwanted projects before the public learns of the plans. Even after basic disclosure, the full extent of negative community impacts remains hidden by those operating in the shadows.
In a letter sent today, NC WARN repeats our June 25 call for Governor Josh Stein to stop Duke Energy from recruiting data centers and to lead a moratorium on new ones. It’s clear that his silence indicates the odious, backroom deal-making continues – and almost surely includes state officials and tax money.
NEW POWER PLANTS TOO
We also told Stein today that many communities targeted for data centers will also be saddled with new power plants built next to the energy-hogging data centers, thus forcing them to bear the significant health burdens of fossil fuel power generation.
Stein must immediately stop Duke Energy from continuing to recruit data centers, which the climate-wrecking corporation uses to justify the largest planned fossil fuel expansion in the US, causing power bills and climate pollution to soar for years. The Governor must also demand a statewide moratorium on new data centers – as called for by a state regulator’s expert in June.
Data center developments have faced well-deserved backlash from communities across the state and nation due to their massive power and water usage, air, water and noise pollution, economic burdens on the public and low job production, among the many factors. Nationally, concerns mount about AI’s role enhancing government-corporate surveillance and war-making.
One of the emerging deceptions is that data centers would pay for new power generation built by Duke Energy. Indications are that Duke leaders are scheming to quietly rebate any upfront costs paid by data center owners, thus forcing even more rate hikes onto other monopoly-captive customers.
North Carolinians are being cheated, and our Governor must demand that it stop.
###
Now in its 38th year, NC WARN is building people power in the climate and energy justice movement to persuade or require Charlotte-based Duke Energy – one of the world’s largest climate polluters – to make a quick transition to renewable, affordable power generation and energy efficiency in order to avert climate tipping points and ongoing rate hikes.
The post Flagrant Foul Called Against Polluters and State Officials Pushing Secretive Data Centers, Pipelines – and Power Plants — NC WARN News Release appeared first on NC WARN.
DOGE memoir skips the part where children died and taxpayers got ripped off
This summer, America’s national debt crossed the $40 trillion mark—a grim milestone that put an exclamation point on the abject failure of DOGE, Elon Musk’s effort to reshape the federal government. This week, Tyler Hassen, the former oil executive who ran DOGE’s operation inside the Interior department, published a memoir of revisionist history titled Inside DOGE in which he tries to rehabilitate his and Musk’s image. But DOGE’s record is permanently written in scars across American landscapes and etched on the headstones of hundreds of thousands of children.
Hassen, who now runs a cleaning supply company that has pivoted to building AI data center infrastructure, concedes in the Wall Street Journal that DOGE never dented the national debt. “Did we achieve it? Of course not,” he writes, before dismissing critics as quibbling over the definition of savings and calling for a permanent DOGE housed in Congress. He cites a $215 billion savings tracker; POLITICO examined $32.7 billion of DOGE’s claimed contract savings and could verify only $1.4 billion.
The memoir does not mention that the National Park Service has lost roughly 4,000 permanent employees since DOGE’s arrival, about 24 percent of its permanent workforce; or that the U.S. Geological Survey fell from 8,400 employees to 6,800. Hassen defends the layoffs on the grounds that firing people is simply how capitalism operates. “It isn’t personal. It isn’t cruel,” he writes. Records obtained by E&E News show Interior spent $156.5 million on administrative leave between Trump’s second inauguration and the end of 2025, paying employees to stay home for months. That figure covers only the Office of the Secretary and excludes every Interior bureau.
Hassen at the White House, New York Post on X.com
Hassen closes his WSJ op-ed by invoking his five-year-old daughter and the debt she stands to inherit. He should sit her down and explain the rest of it: how his buyouts left taxpayers paying employees to sit at home and do nothing instead of protecting our public lands; that the federal government spent $9.5 billion on paid administrative leave in a single year, six times what it spent in 2023; that the debt passed $40 trillion on August 18, which made the number printed on his own book jacket obsolete five weeks before it shipped; and that he admits in print that none of it worked, and then asks for a chance to do it again.
Hassen should also explain the part that never shows up on a savings tracker. Independent modeling found DOGE’s dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development led to at least 750,000 deaths in the first year alone, most of them children. Yet Hassen complained to the Washington Post that the media treated “every reduction as a moral offense,” as if hundreds of thousands of dead children are an acceptable price to pay for imaginary savings.
Across America’s public lands, thousands of park rangers are gone. Hydrologists who measure what’s left in the Colorado River are gone. Scientists who protect imperiled species are gone. Tyler Hassen got paid for eleven months, then got a book deal, then got a job building data centers. Everyone else got the bill. He calls this moral and patriotic. Millions of Americans would choose a different word.
For more information, visit westernpriorities.org. Sign up for Look West to get daily public lands and energy news sent to your inbox, or subscribe to our podcast, The Landscape.
The post DOGE memoir skips the part where children died and taxpayers got ripped off appeared first on Center for Western Priorities.
Sanders, Casar Introduce Legislation to Create New Federal Agency to Ban Artificial Superintelligence, Pause Advanced AI Development
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) today introduced the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — legislation to stop artificial intelligence (AI) oligarchs from building machines humans cannot control and to pause advanced AI development until we have put in place rigorous federal testing and oversight to ensure AI does not harm humanity.
“When you are racing towards a cliff, you don’t just ease up on the gas pedal. You hit the brakes. When the future of humanity is at stake, we cannot let a handful of Big Tech CEOs write their own rules,” Sanders said. “Scientists have been clear: AI is an existential threat to humanity. It must be treated as such. This legislation will permanently ban the development of artificial superintelligence and would put in place an immediate pause on advanced AI development until we have clear safety rules in place — developed by the most knowledgeable scientists in our country. Congress must act now before it is too late.”
“Experts are warning that AI superintelligence, wielded by the wrong humans or by rogue AI, could kill countless numbers of people. But Donald Trump says he wants to encourage it. Something has to change,” Casar said. “Our bill bans the development of artificial superintelligence and pushes for international agreements so that no one, anywhere, builds AI too powerful for humans to control. Furthermore, our bill would immediately halt other dangerous AI capabilities, such as the capacity to develop biochemical weapons, or the capacity for AI to develop new AI instead of humans.”
Over the past few months, we have learned that AI models can circumvent restrictions to hack into computers. We have learned they can create never-before-seen viruses. And we have learned they can automate research to build smarter AI. Even as the AI companies claim they recognize these dangers and want to slow down, they are racing ahead — investing hundreds of billions of dollars into a technology that nobody can fully predict or control. That is unacceptable. The Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act will protect humanity by:
- Banning Artificial Superintelligence. No person or entity may develop or deploy Artificial Superintelligence — an AI that exceeds human cognitive performance and capabilities across most domains, or has sufficient capabilities to destroy or disempower humanity, including by overthrowing the federal government.
- Pausing Advanced AI development until a new, federal AI regulatory body is up and running and has established clear rules and model review processes to ensure safe and secure development and deployment of AI.
- Establishing a new cabinet-level federal Department of Artificial Intelligence to safeguard the public from the dangers of artificial intelligence, including by enforcing a prohibition on artificial superintelligence. This department will be advised by the most knowledgeable scientists in our country to:
- Monitor frontier AI systems at all stages of the lifecycle for dangerous capabilities.
- Supervise the removal of dangerous capabilities like subverting shutdown commands or conducting unauthorized cyberattacks.
- Supervise the destruction of artificial superintelligence.
- Setting penalties for any person or entity that attempts to violate or circumvent the pauses and prohibitions laid out in this bill. Entities shall be subject to the corporate death penalty, and persons shall be subject to not more than 20 years in prison, which is similar to existing penalties related to unlawfully developing nuclear weapons.
- Working to ban superintelligence around the world by setting the international policy of the United States to pursue international agreements, allied coordination, and policies such as export controls to prevent the development of artificial superintelligence anywhere in the world.
Read the bill text here.
Read a one-page summary here.
Read a section-by-section summary here.
So Many Birds, So Little Time (or Bands)
Gov. Moore’s Data Center Executive Order Takes Positive Steps But Fails to Embrace Moratorium and Clean Energy Mandate, Leaves Communities Vulnerable
ANNAPOLIS, MD — Governor Wes Moore took positive steps to protect Marylanders from the harms of data centers with his executive order (EO) released today. In a press conference announcing the EO, the Governor spelled out five principles guiding the state’s criteria for considering data center projects, barred Maryland employees from entering into nondisclosure agreements with data center developers, and called on the General Assembly to repeal the sales and use tax exemption for data centers. However, the EO fails to establish a statewide moratorium on data center development, something county and municipal leaders have been seeking for months. It also contains no explicit clean energy requirements for data centers even as the global climate unravels.
With 80 percent of Marylanders – including residents across red and blue regions – now living under some kind of temporary local ban or moratorium on data centers, leaders and activists across the state have been hoping Moore or the General Assembly would establish rigorous state-level guidance and leadership on this critical issue. At the top of that wish list is a multi-year state-level pause on new data center permits to allow true reform policies to be developed and take hold. Moore even told Punchbowl News last week that he would sign a moratorium bill from the General Assembly if it reached his desk in 2027.
Governor Moore’s executive order falls silent on this issue. Instead, his EO establishes the Maryland Data Center Accountability Task Force that must consider whether a data center project meets five principles: ratepayer and grid protections; economic benefits for Marylanders, including local hiring and union jobs; the preservation of community input, including no state preemption of local decisions; language around environmental protections, but no requirements for clean energy; and transparency and accountability, including the establishment of a public dashboard to track proposed projects and the commitments made by data center companies. Several of the outlined principles begin to address on-site pollution, rising energy bills associated with data center infrastructure and demand, and community impacts, but the principles are vague and leave the agencies with little direction and significant discretion.
Also, with climate change impacts escalating across Maryland and the world, Governor Moore in his executive order, fails to require all new energy required from future data centers come from 100 percent clean power, a top priority of virtually every environmental group in the state. The EO directs the Task Force to look at the State’s climate commitments, but they are just one factor to be considered; the EO does not mandate adherence to the state’s climate goals or require data centers to run on clean energy.
Brittany Baker, Maryland Director of Chesapeake Climate Action Network (CCAN), issued the following statement:
“Governor Moore’s executive order takes several meaningful steps forward and the legislature will have to finish the task. Maryland communities confronting data center development speak in the language of bans and moratoriums. A statewide multi-year pause on data center development is the most logical next step.
“Given the deepening climate crisis, Gov. Moore and the General Assembly must explicitly require all new data centers run on 100% clean energy. Period. Full stop.
“A multi-year statewide pause on new data center approvals is needed until strong, enforceable protections for ratepayers, water, air, land, and the climate are fully in place. With scientists warning that the window to prevent the worst impacts of climate change is rapidly narrowing, Maryland should not lock itself into a new wave of massive energy demand and fossil-fuel infrastructure before those safeguards exist.”
CCAN is supportive of policy proposals to ensure that data centers pay for infrastructure they incentivize the incumbent utility to build, procure their own clean energy resources, ban nondisclosure agreements, eliminate by-right development, and close regulatory loopholes that allow diesel generation to escape compliance with the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative.
CCAN is now calling on Marylanders to sign the petition for a statewide moratorium on new data center development. In addition, the group will be hosting “People Over Data Centers”- Maryland Action Summit on November 7 in Baltimore alongside Nature Forward.
# # #
Chesapeake Climate Action Network (CCAN) is the first grassroots organization dedicated exclusively to raising awareness about the impacts and solutions associated with global warming in the Chesapeake Bay region. Founded in 2002, CCAN has been at the center of the fight for clean energy and wise climate policy in Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, DC.
The post Gov. Moore’s Data Center Executive Order Takes Positive Steps But Fails to Embrace Moratorium and Clean Energy Mandate, Leaves Communities Vulnerable appeared first on Chesapeake Climate Action Network.
Despite “real progress”, third of countries still lack early warning systems
A United Nations initiative to ensure everyone on earth is protected by a multi-hazard early warning system (MHEWS) “has made real progress” but “too many people are still left exposed,” according to United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres.
Since Guterres launched the Early Warning Systems for All goal in 2022, the number of countries reporting that they have an MHEWS has increased from 113 to 136, the UN announced on Wednesday. Around 60 nations are still not covered 15 months ahead of the UN’s 2027 deadline.
“We must close the remaining gaps, reach every country, and ensure that by the end of 2027, every person on earth is protected”, outgoing UN chief Guterres said.
The UN said the largest gaps in coverage are mainly among the world’s least developed countries, small island developing states and fragile and conflict-affected nations. These countries are also among those hardest hit by climate change.
Guterres said that early warning systems “save lives, protect livelihoods and shield communities from disaster”, highlighting the Colombian Red Cross’s response to drought in June as an example.
At an event on the initiative in New York on Monday, Huw Beynon from the UN Disaster Risk Reduction Office said that the systems had helped during floods in Kenya last year and when recent cyclones hit Madagascar.
Jagan Chapagain, head of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, said in a statement that “reaching more people with early warnings is a success worth celebrating”.
Simple warnings not enoughThe Early Warning Systems for All initiative supports about 160 countries and 31 countries have developed national roadmaps to install early warning systems. But Beynon said that, while most countries have a MHEWS, most also report limited capacity. “So you might have a warning disseminated but it’s not leading to the right action,” he said.
Speaking alongside Beynon, Nepali climate negotiator Manjeet Dhakal gave a recent example of this. He said Nepali authorities had sent text messages to 600,000 people – including him – who were in, or had recently been in, an area where flooding was likely.
Residents walk along a muddy road following flash floods on August 27, 2026 in Trishuli, Nepal. (Photo: Ezra Acayan/Getty Images)The flood, caused by a glacial rock-ice collapse, swept through the valley at huge speed, with a wave at least 30 metres above the river, killing thousands. But the messages did not “articulate the magnitude of this disaster”, he said, adding “these are humans who have to craft that message and that scale of disaster has never [previously] occurred”. The Straits Times has reported that these messages did not say how fast or big the flood would be and were sent too late for many.
When heavy rainfall led to floods in the Spanish city of Valencia in 2024, some text messages with warnings were only sent out after flooding had started and did not give residents clear instructions of how to act, such as moving to higher floors and not driving. Many Valencians drowned in their cars or in the underground garages of their apartment blocks, according to official reports.
Remaining barriersRohini Kohli, the UN Development Programme’s head of climate adaptation policy, told Monday’s New York event that a challenge for MHEWS in developing countries is a lack of foundational data.
This can include equipment to measure physical factors like rainfall, river levels and soil moisture or human factors like where peoples homes or power lines are located. The UN’s Systematic Observations Financing Facility is trying to bridge this “critical gap”, she said.
Another barrier, Kohli said, is that acting on early warnings is often the responsibility of local rather than national authorities and they need the capacity to respond in the right way. “Like most adaptation, local leadership has to be at the centre for design and delivery,” she said.
The IFRC’s Chapagain said that as “warnings alone are not enough”, authorities should “invest in trusted local actors so that communities can turn information into action and become agents of their own resilience, not simply recipients of alerts. Early action is what makes early warnings work.”
Kohli added that a lack of finance was also a problem for developing countries. She cited the UN’s adaptation gap report, which found that developing countries will need well over $300 billion a year by 2035 to adapt to climate change while they are currently receiving less than a tenth of that figure.
In 2022, the World Meteorological Organisation estimated that meeting the early warning systems for all goal would require a total of $1.5 billion.
The post Despite “real progress”, third of countries still lack early warning systems appeared first on Climate Home News.
El Niño starves the peoples of the Global South
The return of the natural climate phenomenon is worsening the food crisis in Central America and on the African continent. This event could become the most powerful ever recorded.
The post El Niño starves the peoples of the Global South appeared first on La Via Campesina - EN.
Microgrids must push beyond pilots, into everyday grid operations: panel
EPRI’s Jackie Baum says microgrids have to do more than sit idle for emergencies. “The majority of the time, the power is on,” she said, urging utilities to use those resources.
National Nurses United endorses Angie Nixon to represent Florida in the U.S. Senate
FERC has options for modernizing PJM’s governance
The commission’s jurisdiction over transmission governance allows it to modify filing-rights allocations and adjust the PJM Interconnection’s nominating committee, writes Harvard Law’s Ari Peskoe.
Groundwork Reveals the Hidden Cost of AI
Today, Groundwork Collaborative and Reset Tech released a new report, “The Hidden Costs of AI for American Households,” which exposes how artificial intelligence (AI) is already increasing costs for every American in nearly every line of the budget – and how that toll will only grow.
AI is already increasing prices for American families, with electronics and electricity bills on the rise due to the AI data center buildout, to groceries and other retail purchases plagued by AI-powered pricing abuses. AI is also making online scams easier to carry out and harder to detect, adding to the estimated $119 billion per year that Americans lose to internet-based scams and cybercrime. The report reveals how corporations are prioritizing profits over affordability. Delta’s CEO bragged that AI will increase his airline’s profitability by as much as 50%. Tech companies are allowing AI to worsen mental health, which already costs our economy an estimated $282 billion a year. And health insurers are using AI to review claims, leading 60% of doctors to be concerned about increasing denials.
As Americans grapple with a raging affordability crisis, the report outlines concrete actions policymakers can take to reduce the cost of AI that stands to pile on, including banning surveillance pricing, prohibiting insurers from using AI to deny health care, implementing Groundwork’s plan to freeze household electricity rates, and adopting stronger liability frameworks that hold AI companies accountable.
Janelle Jones, Senior Fellow at Groundwork Collaborative, and co-author of the report, said:
“As working people face an affordability crisis, higher prices caused by AI are the last thing they need. It’s another attack on household budgets that add up, and which working people certainly shouldn’t be on the hook for.”
Rishi Bharwani, U.S. Director of Reset Tech, and co-author of the report, said:
“AI could be lowering costs for American families but instead it’s become a hidden tax on households – paid through online scams, surveillance pricing, higher electric bills, denied health claims and rising premiums. Families feel it every day, even if they can’t see it. Lawmakers need to act now to stop greedy corporations from using AI to squeeze consumers.”
BACKGROUND
- AI is fueling a new wave of online scams, and it’s costing consumers billions. AI is making online fraud easier to scale and harder to detect, allowing scammers to clone voices, create deepfakes, and impersonate trusted people. Internet-based scams and cybercrime cost Americans $148 billion in 2025. However, the true financial burden is likely substantially higher because for every reported crime, six go unreported.
- AI is increasing the mental health risks of social media use and adding to families’ health care costs. One study found that adults who use AI daily are 30% more likely to experience at least moderate depression than adults who do not use AI at all, and nearly half of U.S. teenagers say social media is mostly harmful to people their age. Out-of-pocket spending on pediatric behavioral health reached $2.9 billion in 2022, an increase of about 38% over the previous 11 years.
- Health insurance companies are using AI in ways that drive up costs for patients. Insurers use AI to review claims and prior authorizations, and 60% of physicians say they are concerned that AI is increasing denials. When claims are denied or delayed, patients may have to pay out of pocket, appeal the decision, or postpone care.
- AI-driven pricing systems are spreading rapidly across the economy. Companies are deploying AI systems to analyze consumer data and tailor prices to the individual. For example, an investigation of Instacart pricing by Groundwork Collaborative, Consumer Reports, and More Perfect Union found nearly three-quarters of grocery items were offered to shoppers at multiple price points, prices were up to 23% higher for some shoppers on the exact same items, and these practices could translate into a swing of about $1,200 a year for a family of four.
- AI is giving insurers new ways to charge drivers more. Insurers are using increasingly detailed data about how, when, and where people drive to assess risk and set personalized premiums. Companies such as LexisNexis Risk Solutions and Verisk aggregate driving behavior data and sell it to insurers, and LexisNexis products were used in 86% of new U.S. auto insurance policies issued in 2023.
- AI-driven pricing is making travel more expensive by allowing airlines, hotels, and booking platforms to tailor prices based on consumer data and online behavior. Delta’s CEO has said AI could increase the airline’s profitability by as much as 50% as airlines and other travel companies use sophisticated tech and robust customer data profiles to set prices.
- The rapid expansion of AI data centers is pushing more of the cost of the AI buildout onto household electricity bills. Data centers’ share of U.S. electricity use could nearly triple from 4.4% in 2023 to about 12% by 2030, and residential electricity rates could climb 15% to 40% above 2025 levels by 2030.
- Surging demand from AI data centers is making everyday electronics more expensive for consumers. AI data centers and consumer electronics manufacturers rely on many of the same chips and memory and must compete for a limited supply. Since the start of 2026, Apple has raised prices on some of its most popular laptops by $200 to $300 and on every iPhone by at least $100, and Microsoft has increased Xbox console prices by $100 to $150.
The Calendar Says We’re Doing Better With the Environment. My Bedroom Says Differently.
This year Earth Overshoot Day — the date each year when humanity has used more from the planet than it can regenerate in 12 months — fell on July 30, six days later than last year.
That sounds like progress. It isn’t. The date moved because researchers revised their estimate of how much carbon the ocean absorbs, not because we consumed less. Strip out the accounting change and the underlying trend went the other way. By the actual measure, 2026 is the deepest ecological overshoot ever recorded.
I recognize the maneuver, because I run it on myself constantly.
My bedroom overflows with Jellycats. My organizer is bursting with beauty products, many still sealed. My closet holds clothes I have never worn. The Jellycats have mostly migrated under my bed, where they serve as expensive chew toys for my dog. And I have already moved on — I collect NeeDoh squishies now.
Every purchase came with a story about why it wasn’t really a purchase. It was on sale. It was self-care. It was the last one. I was, at every step, a person making a reasonable decision. Only in aggregate does it look like what it is.
Photo: Logan Hana Higase-ChenThe aggregate is the part nobody shows you.
The idea for this piece arrived in the form of an empty shelf. I went to a bookstore looking for a new NeeDoh and found bare pegs. My parents, humoring what I was treating as a genuine crisis, stopped at a Target on their way home. My dad sent me a photo: an entire wall, cleared out.
My first thought was that TikTokers had bought everything. All those people with the restock hauls and the unboxing videos, sweeping shelves bare, leaving nothing for the children the toys are actually made for. They have a shopping problem.
My second thought took longer to arrive. I looked at the pile of Jellycats. I looked at the growing pile of NeeDohs.
I have a shopping problem.
Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok launched as places to talk to your friends. They have become the most efficient sales channels ever built, and the transition happened without anyone announcing it. Scroll for 90 seconds and you will pass a restock video, an unboxing, a haul. The algorithm doesn’t reward the person who explains why she doesn’t need the thing. It rewards volume — the biggest haul, the fastest turnaround, the fullest cart. Brands ship free product to influencers, influencers generate demand, demand generates the next shipment. There is no exit.
The result is that we no longer buy what we need. We buy what is trending, which means we buy something engineered to stop trending. Trend-driven consumption is excessive and obsolescent at once: quick to buy, quick to trash.
The numbers behind “quick to trash” are worse than most people assume. The EPA’s most recent full accounting found that Americans generated 292.4 million tons of municipal solid waste in a single year — 4.9 pounds per person per day, or roughly 1,800 pounds each. That figure covers everything in the bin, not just shopping. But shopping is the part we choose, purchase by purchase, and it is the part growing fastest. Apparel consumption alone is projected to rise 63% by 2030, with emissions from textile manufacturing climbing about 60% over the same period. Less than 1% of clothing gets recycled into new clothing.
None of this is a secret. That is what makes it strange. We know, and we buy anyway, because knowing happens in one part of the brain and the checkout button lives in another — one tap away, saved card, no friction, no pause.
So I want to be careful about what I’m actually asking.
The easy ending here is a pledge. I put down my credit card, I empty my cart, I say “not today” to the next micro-trend, and I invite you to join me. I am making that pledge. I mean it.
But I don’t think personal restraint is a serious answer to a system built by people whose full-time job is defeating personal restraint. I am a competitive figure skater. Discipline is, professionally speaking, my entire personality. It took a photograph of an empty Target wall to help me notice what was happening in my own bedroom. If discipline alone were enough, I wouldn’t have the piles.
What actually helps is friction, and friction can be designed. Platforms could stop merging the feed and the storefront. They could stop optimizing for haul content. Disclosure rules for gifted product could have teeth. Right now every design decision runs one direction, and we call the outcome a personal failing.
In the meantime there are smaller counterweights. De-influencers, who post about what not to buy. Project Pan, which asks you to finish a product before replacing it. “Underconsumption core,” which is just the ordinary thrift my grandmother wouldn’t have thought worth a hashtag.
Earth Overshoot Day exists to make an abstraction legible: Here’s the day the budget ran out. My version is less rigorous. It’s a pile of stuffed animals under a bed, being slowly destroyed by a dog.
Both are ways of finally seeing the total.
Republish this article for free! Read our reprint policy. Previously in The Revelator:Dangerous Drinking: Is Bottled Water Really Safer Than Tap Water?
The post The Calendar Says We’re Doing Better With the Environment. My Bedroom Says Differently. appeared first on The Revelator.
FERC rejects ComEd’s cancellation of PowerHouse Hillwood data center contract
A 1.8-GW, $20 billion data center planned by PowerHouse Hillwood was underpinned by a $1 letter of credit — “less than the price of a cup of coffee” — that drew skepticism from FERC Commissioner David LaCerte.
Pages
The Fine Print I:
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are not the official position of the IWW (or even the IWW’s EUC) unless otherwise indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone but the author’s, nor should it be assumed that any of these authors automatically support the IWW or endorse any of its positions.
Further: the inclusion of a link on our site (other than the link to the main IWW site) does not imply endorsement by or an alliance with the IWW. These sites have been chosen by our members due to their perceived relevance to the IWW EUC and are included here for informational purposes only. If you have any suggestions or comments on any of the links included (or not included) above, please contact us.
The Fine Print II:
Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc.
It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.




