You are here
With a Velvet Glove, Mercedes Tries to Punch Down Alabama Union Momentum
By Luis Feliz Leon - Labor Notes, April 10, 2024
Workers at Mercedes-Benz in Alabama were forced to attend 20-minute anti-union meetings with the company’s top management today.
Recordings obtained by Labor Notes show top management dangled carrots and put on a contrite-boss act, promising to do better.
Workers filed with the National Labor Relations Board on April 5 for the first-ever election to unionize the 5,200 people who work at the plant.
Mercedes claims to be neutral in the election, but it’s also listed as a supporter of the Business Council of Alabama’s anti-union website, Alabama Strong. The Auto Workers (UAW) has filed multiple unfair labor practice charges accusing the company of retaliating against pro-union workers.
“The meeting was a waste of time,” said battery plant worker David Johnston afterwards. “It was meaningless other than trying to develop sympathy from their workforce, saying they’ve held true to their promises and commitments made—committing to stay neutral, yet they couldn’t be anything further, especially after involving themselves with the anti-union organization Alabama Strong.”
Even after the captive-audience meeting, the momentum keeps building. “One of the guys in my shop that is on the fence told me we gained votes from that meeting,” said Jacob Ryan, a body shop worker who started out as a temp.
‘SIGN OF THE TIMES’
This is the second such meeting. The first was in February, after workers reached 30 percent on union cards and took their campaign public. The company then announced it would eliminate two-tier pay, convert all current temporary workers to permanent employees, and institute a new bonus system modeled on profit-sharing at the Big 3 auto companies.
In today’s meeting, Vice President of Quality Ashim Manchanda elaborated on “what we are doing to react quickly to changing conditions when it comes to hiring strategies and compensation for our team members.”
He didn’t say what exactly those changing conditions were, but to workers it’s clear the company is trying to stem the momentum of their union campaign—a momentum so great that even anti-union workers recognize how different it is from previous drives that fizzled quickly.
“It might be a sign of the times,” anti-union worker Jay White told NPR about pro-union sentiment in the plant. “It may be a generational situation.”
PALTRY BONUS AND FOCUS GROUPS
The morning meeting opened with remarks from Mercedes-Benz U.S. International (MBUSI) President and CEO Michael Göbel, who shared some basics about the upcoming election.
Then Manchanda announced that workers will receive the first $700 quarterly performance bonus April 26, and talked about improvements with onboarding new hires.
The plant has struggled to retain workers and suffers from understaffing, especially on grueling assembly lines where workers are denied bathroom breaks.
“We are also taking seriously the feedback that your management should be approachable and more engaged on the shop floor,” Manchanda said.
Workers have said management uses favoritism to dole out overtime and other perks through what’s known as “group leader discretion.” Sometimes, workers say, the favoritism is racially coded.
The company’s solution? It’s going to run “focus groups”—in other words, plenty more captive-audience meetings ahead of the union vote.
ALABAMA DISCOUNT
When Göbel retook the mic, he groused about a pro-union talking point first reported in Labor Notes last November.
A perpetual challenge for the UAW in the South has been that auto manufacturing jobs pay well above other options in these low-wage states. There’s also less familiarity with unions, especially among younger workers. The unionization rate in Alabama is 7.2 percent.
When the automakers located their plants in the South, these points factored into their calculation.
“It’s the Alabama discount,” Jeremy Kimbrell told Labor Notes last November. He was then earning $32 an hour, after 24 years on the job at Mercedes. Workers now top out at $34 an hour—compared to $47 an hour at the Big 3 automakers by the end of the current contract.
As part of a benefits package for locating in Alabama, America’s fourth-poorest state gave Mercedes a $42.6 million subsidy for plant construction. For a while the state also paid the wages of trainee workers. The then-governor was forced to borrow from the state’s pension fund at 9 percent interest to meet its financial obligation to the company.
Meanwhile, “in 17 years, we have gotten a raise of roughly $4.50,” said Ryan. “We are making luxury vehicles. The company is making record profits year after year, while taking more and more from us.”
Reacting to such complaints, Göbel got defensive. “We’ve been hearing a lot from the UAW about why Mercedes came to Alabama,” he said. “They say we came to take advantage of Alabama workers and to take advantage of the so-called Alabama discount. Respectfully, they weren’t here.”
It’s a familiar employer tactic to portray the union as an outsider and a third party—“they weren’t here.” But this campaign has been strikingly grassroots, run by a committee of workers inside the plant.
Göbel tapped Rusty Jones, a senior manager in the body shop who started in 1996, to tell a cornier version of the factory’s origin story: “Mercedes chose Alabama because of the people,” Jones said.
The plant started with one model, the popular Mercedes M-Class SUV, and expanded. “Now through hard work, dedication, and success, we’re trusted to build seven models at our plant today,” Jones said.
Surely Mercedes workers can also be trusted to make their own decision on union representation.
Disclaimer: The views expressed here are not the official position of the IWW (or even the IWW’s EUC) and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone but the author.
The Fine Print I:
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are not the official position of the IWW (or even the IWW’s EUC) unless otherwise indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone but the author’s, nor should it be assumed that any of these authors automatically support the IWW or endorse any of its positions.
Further: the inclusion of a link on our site (other than the link to the main IWW site) does not imply endorsement by or an alliance with the IWW. These sites have been chosen by our members due to their perceived relevance to the IWW EUC and are included here for informational purposes only. If you have any suggestions or comments on any of the links included (or not included) above, please contact us.
The Fine Print II:
Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc.
It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.