You are here

News Feeds

2026 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #29

Skeptical Science - Sun, 07/19/2026 - 08:38
A listing of 28 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, July 12, 2026 thru Sat, July 18, 2026. Stories we promoted this week, by category:

Climate Change Impacts (7 articles)

Climate Science and Research (6 articles)

Climate Policy and Politics (4 articles)

Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation (3 articles)

Miscellaneous (3 articles)

Climate Education and Communication (2 articles)

Climate Law and Justice (1 article)

  • He sued the oil industry for $51B. Now he faces Republicans in a private grilling. The fossil fuel industry and its allies have targeted the science that factors into many of the climate lawsuits for nearly a decade; with attribution science showing how fossil fuel companies supercharge extreme weather the industry claims that the growing field exists solely to propel litigation. Politico, Lesley Clark, Hailey Fuchs, Corbin Hiar and Chelsea Harvey, Jul 15, 2026.

Public Misunderstandings about Climate Science (1 article)

Public Misunderstandings about Climate Solutions (1 article)

If you happen upon high quality climate-science and/or climate-myth busting articles from reliable sources while surfing the web, please feel free to submit them via this Google form so that we may share them widely. Thanks!
Categories: I. Climate Science

Op-Ed | First We Subsidized Factory Farms. Now We’re Redesigning Animals for Them.

Food Tank - Sun, 07/19/2026 - 07:00

Earlier this year, the House passed a Farm Bill packed with giveaways to Big Agriculture. Rather than confronting the environmental, public health, and economic harms of industrial agriculture, lawmakers doubled down on the status quo—protecting powerful agribusiness interests while falling short on meaningful investments in sustainable farming, conservation, and rural communities.

Unfortunately, the recent Senate draft doesn’t do much better. As senators debate their version of the Farm Bill, they face a fundamental question—will federal farm policy continue subsidizing and entrenching the factory farm model, or will it help build a healthier, more resilient food system?

That question is especially urgent with the emergence of a new generation of technologies that promises to solve the problems of industrial livestock production. Chief among them are genetically engineered animals.

Instead of addressing the overcrowding, disease, pollution, and animal suffering that factory farms create, biotechnology companies are redesigning animals to better tolerate those conditions. The message is clear: don’t fix the system—change the animals.

A new Friends of the Earth report, Engineering Harm: Why Genetically Engineered Animals Deepen Risks to Public Health and Animal Welfare, documents how this approach is moving rapidly from the laboratory into the food system. Since 2020, federal regulators have approved three genetically engineered animals for human consumption, including cattle engineered to better tolerate heat and pigs engineered to resist disease.

Supporters present these genetically engineered animals as innovative solutions to agricultural challenges. In reality, they represent a troubling extension of the same industrial model that created many of those challenges in the first place.

Consider cattle engineered for heat tolerance, which are being promoted as a response to rising temperatures, even as industrial livestock production remains a major contributor to the climate crisis.

Likewise, disease-resistant pigs. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) costs the pork industry hundreds of millions of dollars annually, largely because the virus spreads rapidly in the crowded conditions typical of industrial operations. Rather than reducing animal density or improving living conditions, the industry is engineering pigs to withstand the disease.

At the same time, corporate interests have doubled down on their efforts to advance the so-called Save our Bacon Act in the Farm Bill, which would overturn state animal welfare laws designed to move away from the extreme confinement of pigs and other farm animals. And the stakes extend beyond animal welfare—it would also undermine states’ authority to establish stronger agricultural production standards that protect public health, the environment, and local communities. Though this harmful provision wasn’t included in the base text of the Senate Farm Bill, industry allies are expected to continue pushing to include it as the legislative process moves forward.

For decades, federal farm policy has helped prop up industrial animal agriculture through commodity subsidies, crop insurance programs, and policies that favor large-scale production. Taxpayer dollars already support a system linked to water pollution, antibiotic overuse, greenhouse gas emissions, and the hollowing out of rural communities. Genetically engineered livestock threaten to make things even worse by helping factory farms adapt and expand without addressing the conditions that make them harmful in the first place.

And genetically engineered animals raise serious concerns of their own.

Creating these animals often involves cloning and other invasive procedures with high failure rates. Friends of the Earth finds that thousands of cloned embryos used in the development of the genetically engineered GalSafe pig resulted in only a handful of successful animals. Mortality rates among genetically engineered piglets were significantly higher than in conventional pigs. In other cases, animals developed abnormalities or died during the development process.

Scientists have also documented unintended genetic changes associated with engineering animals, including mutations that can affect animal health and welfare. Despite industry claims of precision, the results of gene-editing technologies are often not predictable, and the long-term consequences remain poorly understood.

The public health risks deserve equal scrutiny. One genetically engineered pig approved for sale contains an antibiotic-resistance marker gene, raising concerns about the potential spread of antibiotic resistance—one of the most pressing public health challenges of our time. Disease-resistant animals may also create evolutionary pressures that encourage viruses to evolve in unexpected ways. Yet federal regulators have largely brushed aside these concerns.

Perhaps most troubling is how little independent oversight exists. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration relies heavily on data generated by the companies seeking approval. Public access to safety data is limited. Independent scientific review is often absent. In some cases, regulators have exempted genetically engineered animals from full approval processes altogether.

This should concern anyone who cares about food safety, scientific integrity, or democratic accountability.

The Senate’s Farm Bill debate offers a chance to begin charting a different course.

Instead of helping factory farms become more efficient at producing disease, pollution, and animal suffering, lawmakers should invest in farming systems that already provide proven benefits for public health, animal welfare, and the environment. Congress could expand support for well-managed pasture-based livestock systems, organic agriculture, regional food infrastructure, conservation programs, and farmer transition assistance. It could strengthen local processing capacity, improve animal welfare standards, and reduce dependence on routine antibiotics. And it must reject the Save Our Bacon Act and any effort to strip local communities and states of their authority to set strong agricultural production standards.

These approaches do not require redesigning animals to fit factory farms. They require redesigning farming systems to work with animals, people, and ecosystems.

Articles like the one you just read are made possible through the generosity of Food Tank members. Can we please count on you to be part of our growing movement? Become a member today by clicking here.

Photo courtesy of Yaw Ansu-Kyeremeh, Unsplash

The post Op-Ed | First We Subsidized Factory Farms. Now We’re Redesigning Animals for Them. appeared first on Food Tank.

Categories: A3. Agroecology

Trump again shrinks Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments

Grist - Sun, 07/19/2026 - 06:00

Monday morning, Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments stretched across over 3 million acres of public lands in southern Utah, protecting some of the country’s most remote landscapes and scores of archaeological sites sacred to local tribes. By that evening, President Donald Trump had cut the monuments to just 302,600 acres.

While the two executive orders gutting the monuments and their protections repeat an action from the first Trump administration that was reversed by President Joe Biden, Monday’s reductions go far further than before.

In December 2017, Trump signed proclamations to reduce Bears Ears National Monument from 1.3 million acres to roughly 228,000 acres, an 85 percent reduction, while Grand Staircase-Escalante was cut nearly in half, from 1.9 million acres to about 1 million. Monday’s executive orders cut the monuments to less than a quarter of what was left after the previous shrinking of the monuments.

Flanked by Utah Republicans, Trump said in signing the executive orders that new restrictions made it virtually impossible to hunt, fish, or even walk on the monuments, which is not true. Both are accessible to visitors, including for hunting and fishing.

Trump’s executive orders will take effect in 60 days. Shrinking the boundaries of the monuments, the orders state, will better align with the administration’s goals for public lands: opening them up to extraction. 

The orders say the decision puts power back in the hands of local communities, despite its disbanding and terminating of an inter-tribal working group for Bears Ears that led co-stewardship efforts at the monument—the first of its kind, and the result of years of advocacy from local tribes. Tribal officials said they were not consulted about the decision to reduce the monuments. 

“[Trump is] saying the quiet part out loud. He’s being honest: I’m doing this so that we can mine and drill and graze cows,” said John Ruple, a law professor and program director at the University of Utah’s Wallace Stegner Center for Land, Resources, and the Environment. “We’ll see if the American people think those are the best uses of national monuments, and we’ll see if courts agree with that, too.”

Davina Smith-Idjesa, a member of the Navajo Nation and part of both monuments’ inter-tribal coalitions, said reading the proclamations was a reminder “of genocide and that tribes are expendable” in the U.S. 

Uranium mining in the Four Corners region left members of her family sick and dead, she said after the signing of the executive orders, and now the prospect looms of these sacred areas being made available for extraction again.

A view of Bears Ears National Monument at sunset. Tim Peterson

“Bears Ears is at my back door,” she said during a press conference Tuesday morning. “This is not a political talking point for me. This is home. My ancestors knew this land. My family knows this land. I know where our people go to pray, to gather medicines, to gather food and to heal. This is our grocery store, our medicine cabinet, our classroom, our church. And I need people to understand: You cannot take a pin, draw a line through the landscape, and tell us what remains should be enough.”

Ruple said there is little political upside to the decision, and polling consistently shows Americans support the monuments and the protection of public lands. Attacks on public lands, including Grand Staircase-Escalante, in recent years have consistently failed. 

The Antiquities Act, he said, makes clear that presidents have the power to create monuments, but not rescind them. That power rests with Congress.

The executive orders come after a June decision in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals that reversed a district court’s opinion to dismiss a lawsuit from the state of Utah attacking the Biden administration’s restoration of the borders of Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments after Trump first shrank them. The lawsuit also targets the powers of the Antiquities Act of 1906, which allows presidents to create national monuments. It was signed by President Teddy Roosevelt, who later used it to protect the Grand Canyon as a national monument before it later became a park. 

“If you go and eviscerate these two monuments, now I suspect we’re going to see the Department of Justice go into the district court and say, ‘Look, this case is moot. The monuments have been reduced by every inch that were restored and the Biden proclamations have now been undone,’” Ruple said. 

Read Next Republicans deployed a little-known law to open Minnesota wilderness to mining

Environmental groups and tribal leaders who have long advocated for the protection of the two monuments vowed to continue fighting to protect them. Both were vital to the creation of Bears Ears, which is the first and only national monument co-managed between the federal government and local tribes. 

Last time the Trump administration shrank the monuments, Earthjustice, representing a coalition of environmental groups and tribes, sued over the decision. The organization vowed to do so again.

The executive orders came as no surprise. Last March, the Trump administration announced it would eliminate California’s Chuckwalla and Sáttítla Highlands national monuments before removing language announcing that decision from a White House fact sheet. Then last June, the Department of Justice issued an opinion that the president has the power to review and eliminate national monuments.

Project 2025, the policy roadmap for a second Trump administration coordinated by the conservative Heritage Foundation, has called for reducing the size of those national monuments and others — and even suggested repealing the Antiquities Act of 1906.

In a press call Tuesday in response to the executive orders, Democratic members of Congress condemned the proclamations for prioritizing public lands for mining rather than for the American people, expressing fear that other protected areas could be targeted next and that cultural and religious sites could be vandalized.

“This is a trend coming from Donald Trump and from this administration,” said Senator Ben Ray Luján, a Democrat from New Mexico. “While these monuments are in Utah, they belong to all of us across the United States.”

“The administration is on the wrong side of history here, ignoring the voices of Tribal Nations, local communities, and the millions of Americans who want these places protected for future generations,” said Tracy Stone-Manning, Wilderness Society president and former director of the Bureau of Land Management under the Biden administration, in a statement. “As our nation marks 250 years, these public lands should be handed down, not over to drilling and mining interests.”

This story was originally published by Grist with the headline Trump again shrinks Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments on Jul 19, 2026.

Categories: H. Green News

Radical Democracy & Autonomy series

Global Tapestry of Alternatives - Sun, 07/19/2026 - 05:03
Radical Democracy & Autonomy series * Volume 1: Radical Democracy: recovering the roots of self-governance & autonomy * Volume 2: Radical Democracy & Earthy Governance -- * "Radical Democracy and Autonomy: What do we mean? - A Conversation

July 19 Green Energy News

Green Energy Times - Sun, 07/19/2026 - 04:19

Headline News:

  • “India’s Solar And Wind Power Hits Record 42.79% Of Grid Load” • India’s power sector achieved a landmark on July 13 as variable renewable energy sources accounted for 42.79% of the total electricity generation in the country. Wind and solar output combined to peak at 103.7 GW. India is accelerating its transition toward cleaner energy sources. [Whalesbook]

Wind farm in India (Thangaraj Kumaravel, CC BY-SA 2.0)

  • “US Reaches Solar Power Milestone Amid Fossil Fuel Decline” • While gas and nuclear plants still lead the country’s energy mix, solar generated 12.8% of the nation’s electricity in May, according to an analysis of government data by Ember. Coal provided less, just 12.2%. Five years ago, solar was less than half of its current levels and coal was at 20%. [Kiowa County Press]
  • “Spain Faces Hottest Week Of Summer With Temperatures Up To 45°C Next Week” • Spain’s State Meteorological Agency set out a timetable for its next heatwave: Climbing temperatures will intensify by Tuesday, July 22, at the latest, and last until at least Thursday, July 23. Readings that could locally be as high as 45°C (113°F) in the south-eastern third of the country. [Euronews]
  • “Every Day In Every Way, Attribution Science Is Getting Better And Better” • The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine published a report on attribution science. It backs a large body of scientific knowledge that could help governments hold oil, gas, and coal companies responsible for damage caused by extreme weather. [CleanTechnica]
  • “Climate Scientists Have Predicted Greater Flooding In Texas For Decades. It’s Happening Now” • One of the shocking things about the storms that hit Texas this week is that a similar rainfall event struck almost exactly a year ago in many of the same areas. That tragic repetition may not be surprising to those who follow climate science. [Texas Public Radio]

For more news, please visit geoharvey – Daily News about Energy and Climate Change.

Hamba kahle Baba Phila

Global Environmental Trust - Sun, 07/19/2026 - 03:14
2nd February 1966 – 14 July 2026

This beautiful tribute to Philasingazi Alson Ndimande was written by Sinegugu Zukulu, chairperson of the Global Environmental Trust (GET).  Phila was co-founder of the Mfolozi Community Environmental Justice Organisation (MCEJO).

For over 10 years he led the struggle preventing coal mining in the Fuleni reserve, neighbouring the iMfolozi Wilderness Area.

He also supported the Mpukonyoni communities in challenging Tendele Coal mine’s non-compliance and plans to expand. His courage, integrity and uncompromising leadership won him respect and trust.

He was dearly loved and his death has sent shockwaves through the communities and organisations he worked with.  Phila died of pancreatic cancer on  Tuesday evening, 14 July, after a valiant struggle. This was a few months after his 60th birthday. There was still so much he wanted to do. 

Our thoughts are with his family, the Ocilwane community, Fuleni, MCEJO members, friends and comrades. He will be sorely missed. 

May your body and soul rest in peace, dear Phila, and may your spirit soar free.

“In deed, Comrade Phila was bigger than the biggest tree in the forest that supports thousands of creepers to reach the forest canopy for the much needed sunshine. A tree that bears fruits to feed all the birds in the forest. A tree that gives shelter to many other species. A tree that it’s leaves fall down, decompose and fertilise the soil to support growth of many other young trees. May his spirit continue to water the struggle of the people of Zululand. May he be the umbrella that protects, lifts and guides those left behind. May he be a good ancestor to his family. Rest in peace Comrade Phila!!! Phila ngonaphakade kwelemimoya, ulwile ukulwa okuhle!!!”

The post Hamba kahle Baba Phila first appeared on Global Environmental Trust.
Categories: G3. Big Green

Kemenangan Pasaran Parlay Yang Tidak Terduga

Socialist Resurgence - Sun, 07/19/2026 - 00:06

Parlay telah lama menjadi salah satu pilihan menarik bagi penggemar prediksi olahraga karena menawarkan sensasi berbeda dibandingkan taruhan tunggal. Dalam sistem ini, beberapa pilihan pertandingan digabungkan menjadi satu kombinasi, sehingga seluruh prediksi harus tepat agar hasil akhirnya berhasil. Karakteristik tersebut membuat kemenangan parlay sering dianggap sebagai pencapaian yang membutuhkan ketelitian, kesabaran, dan kemampuan membaca pertandingan secara menyeluruh.

Di balik kisah kemenangan besar, terdapat banyak cerita mengenai hasil yang tidak pernah diperkirakan sebelumnya. Tim unggulan dapat kehilangan poin di menit-menit akhir, sementara tim yang dipandang sebagai underdog justru tampil luar biasa. Situasi seperti inilah yang membuat kemenangan pasaran parlay terasa begitu istimewa. Bukan semata karena nilai kemenangan, tetapi karena perjalanan menuju hasil tersebut dipenuhi dinamika yang sulit ditebak.

Pendekatan yang berlandaskan analisis tetap menjadi fondasi utama. Memahami performa tim dalam beberapa pertandingan terakhir, kondisi pemain inti, strategi pelatih, hingga jadwal yang padat merupakan bagian dari proses pengambilan keputusan. Pengalaman menunjukkan bahwa keputusan terbaik biasanya lahir dari informasi yang lengkap, bukan sekadar mengikuti opini populer.

Strategi Cerdas di Balik Kemenangan yang Tak Terduga

Banyak orang mengira kemenangan parlay hanya bergantung pada keberuntungan. Faktanya, berbagai pengamat olahraga dan pemain berpengalaman memiliki pandangan berbeda. Mereka menempatkan riset sebagai langkah pertama sebelum menentukan kombinasi pertandingan. Data statistik, tren performa kandang dan tandang, serta rekor pertemuan menjadi referensi yang membantu mengurangi keputusan emosional.

Dalam praktiknya, kejutan tetap menjadi bagian dari olahraga. Sebuah pertandingan dapat berubah hanya karena satu kartu merah, pergantian pemain yang efektif, atau gol pada masa tambahan waktu. Faktor-faktor tersebut membuat hasil akhir sulit diprediksi secara mutlak. Namun, justru di sinilah daya tarik parlay muncul. Kombinasi analisis yang matang dengan dinamika pertandingan menciptakan pengalaman yang penuh tantangan.

Dari sudut pandang pengalaman, banyak pemain berpengalaman memilih jumlah kombinasi yang masih realistis dibanding mengejar peluang kemenangan besar dengan terlalu banyak pilihan. Pendekatan tersebut membantu menjaga kualitas analisis pada setiap pertandingan. Mereka juga cenderung menghindari keputusan tergesa-gesa hanya karena mengikuti tren sesaat di media sosial.

Aspek kredibilitas informasi juga memiliki peran penting. Mengandalkan statistik resmi, berita terbaru mengenai kondisi pemain, serta perkembangan tim dari sumber tepercaya akan menghasilkan keputusan yang lebih rasional.

Kemenangan pasaran parlay yang tidak terduga sering kali lahir dari kombinasi disiplin, kesabaran, dan kemampuan membaca peluang secara objektif. Hasil besar memang dapat terjadi dalam satu malam, tetapi proses di baliknya biasanya dibangun melalui kebiasaan menganalisis setiap pertandingan dengan cermat. Mereka yang konsisten mengevaluasi hasil sebelumnya juga memiliki peluang lebih baik untuk meningkatkan kualitas prediksi pada kesempatan berikutnya.

Pada akhirnya, parlay bukan sekadar mengejar kemenangan, melainkan menikmati proses memahami pertandingan dari berbagai sudut pandang. Setiap laga menghadirkan cerita, statistik, dan strategi yang berbeda. Ketika seluruh analisis berpadu dengan momen-momen tak terduga di lapangan, lahirlah kemenangan yang memberikan kepuasan tersendiri. Inilah alasan mengapa pasaran parlay tetap menjadi salah satu bentuk hiburan olahraga yang terus menarik perhatian banyak penggemar, sekaligus mengajarkan bahwa persiapan yang matang selalu memiliki nilai, meskipun hasil akhir tetap ditentukan oleh jalannya pertandingan.

Categories: D2. Socialism

Are you an Undocumented Care Worker in Toronto? Join Our Meeting.

Migrant Workers Alliance for Change - Sat, 07/18/2026 - 23:59
.mwac-care-event { --mwac-coral: #ff746f; --mwac-red: #f05258; --mwac-yellow: #f7b332; --mwac-light-yellow: #fff4d2; --mwac-cream: #fffdf7; --mwac-black: #111111; --mwac-grey: #555555; box-sizing: border-box; width: 100%; max-width: 820px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10px 20px 70px; color: var(--mwac-black); font-family: "Inter", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 17px; font-weight: 400; line-height: 1.62; -webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; text-rendering: optimizeLegibility; } .mwac-care-event *, .mwac-care-event *::before, .mwac-care-event *::after { box-sizing: border-box; } html { scroll-behavior: smooth; } .mwac-care-event h2 { margin: 38px 0 15px; color: var(--mwac-black); font-family: "Inter", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: clamp(1.45rem, 4vw, 2rem); font-weight: 600; line-height: 1.25; letter-spacing: -0.02em; } .mwac-care-event p { margin: 0 0 20px; } .mwac-care-event a { color: inherit; } /* Opening salmon panel */ .mwac-care-opening { margin: 0 0 22px; padding: 28px 30px; background: var(--mwac-coral); border-top: 6px solid var(--mwac-yellow); } .mwac-care-opening p { max-width: 690px; margin: 0; color: var(--mwac-black); font-size: clamp(1.25rem, 3.2vw, 1.65rem); font-weight: 700; line-height: 1.32; letter-spacing: -0.02em; } /* Main invitation button */ .mwac-jump-button { display: block; width: 100%; margin: 0 0 32px; padding: 15px 24px; background: var(--mwac-coral); border: 2px solid var(--mwac-black); color: var(--mwac-black); font-family: "Inter", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 1.06rem; font-weight: 700; line-height: 1.2; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; } .mwac-jump-button:hover, .mwac-jump-button:focus { background: var(--mwac-black); color: #ffffff; } /* Meeting details */ .mwac-event-details { margin: 28px 0; padding: 23px 26px; background: var(--mwac-light-yellow); border-left: 5px solid var(--mwac-yellow); } .mwac-event-details h2 { margin: 0 0 13px; } .mwac-event-details p { margin: 0; font-size: 1.05rem; line-height: 1.6; } .mwac-event-details strong { font-size: 1.1rem; font-weight: 600; } .mwac-location-note { margin-top: 14px !important; font-size: 0.98rem !important; font-weight: 500; } /* Eligibility */ .mwac-eligibility { margin: 34px 0; padding: 28px 4px; border-top: 1px solid var(--mwac-black); border-bottom: 1px solid var(--mwac-black); } .mwac-eligibility h2 { margin: 0 0 15px; } .mwac-eligibility ul { margin: 14px 0 20px; padding-left: 24px; } .mwac-eligibility li { margin-bottom: 8px; padding-left: 3px; } .mwac-eligibility p:last-child { margin-bottom: 0; } .mwac-invitation-note { font-weight: 600; } /* Gift card, food and PRESTO */ .mwac-benefits { margin: 30px 0; padding: 24px 27px; background: var(--mwac-coral); } .mwac-benefits h2 { margin: 0 0 16px; font-size: 1.3rem; font-weight: 700; } .mwac-benefits ul { display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap; gap: 10px 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; list-style: none; } .mwac-benefits li { position: relative; padding-left: 23px; font-weight: 600; } .mwac-benefits li::before { content: "✓"; position: absolute; left: 0; font-weight: 700; } /* Meeting topics */ .mwac-care-topics { margin: 15px 0 28px; padding-left: 24px; } .mwac-care-topics li { margin-bottom: 11px; padding-left: 3px; } /* Support section */ .mwac-support { margin: 34px 0; padding: 24px 26px; background: var(--mwac-light-yellow); } .mwac-support h2 { margin: 0 0 13px; font-size: 1.35rem; font-weight: 600; } .mwac-support h2 span { display: inline; padding: 2px 8px 3px; background: var(--mwac-coral); font-style: italic; box-decoration-break: clone; -webkit-box-decoration-break: clone; } .mwac-support p { margin: 0; } .mwac-support a { color: var(--mwac-black); font-weight: 600; text-decoration-thickness: 1.5px; text-underline-offset: 3px; } .mwac-support a:hover, .mwac-support a:focus { background: var(--mwac-black); color: #ffffff; } /* Confidentiality */ .mwac-confidentiality { margin: 34px 0; padding: 23px 26px; background: var(--mwac-black); color: #ffffff; font-size: 1rem; font-weight: 500; line-height: 1.58; } /* Action Network form section */ .mwac-form-section { margin-top: 34px; padding: 31px; background: var(--mwac-cream); border: 1px solid var(--mwac-black); scroll-margin-top: 20px; } .mwac-form-section > h2 { margin: 0 0 9px; font-size: clamp(1.8rem, 5vw, 2.4rem); font-weight: 600; } .mwac-form-section > p { margin-bottom: 26px; color: var(--mwac-grey); } /* Action Network container */ #can-event-area-focusgroup { width: 100%; } #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed { width: 100% !important; max-width: none !important; margin: 0 !important; font-family: "Inter", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif !important; font-weight: 400 !important; } #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed h2, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed h3, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed h4 { color: var(--mwac-black) !important; font-family: "Inter", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif !important; font-weight: 600 !important; letter-spacing: -0.01em !important; } #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed label { color: var(--mwac-black) !important; font-family: "Inter", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif !important; } /* Text fields */ #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed input:not([type="radio"]):not([type="checkbox"]):not([type="submit"]):not( [type="button"] ), #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed select, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed textarea { display: block !important; width: 100% !important; max-width: none !important; min-height: 48px; margin: 0 !important; padding: 10px 12px !important; border: 1.5px solid var(--mwac-black) !important; border-radius: 0 !important; background: #ffffff !important; color: var(--mwac-black) !important; font-family: "Inter", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif !important; font-size: 16px !important; font-weight: 400 !important; } #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed textarea { min-height: 110px; } #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed input:not([type="radio"]):not([type="checkbox"]):not([type="submit"]):not( [type="button"] ):focus, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed select:focus, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed textarea:focus { outline: 3px solid var(--mwac-yellow) !important; outline-offset: 1px; } /* Field labels */ #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed .control-label, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed .form_label, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed .floatlabel-wrapper > label { display: block !important; width: 100% !important; margin: 0 0 7px !important; font-family: "Inter", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif !important; font-weight: 600 !important; line-height: 1.4 !important; letter-spacing: 0 !important; } /* Radio buttons and checkboxes */ #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed input[type="radio"], #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed input[type="checkbox"] { position: static !important; display: inline-block !important; flex: 0 0 18px !important; width: 18px !important; max-width: 18px !important; height: 18px !important; min-height: 18px !important; margin: 2px 9px 0 0 !important; padding: 0 !important; vertical-align: top !important; accent-color: var(--mwac-red); } #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed .check_radio_field, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed .checkbox, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed .radio, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed .international_link-wrap { display: block !important; width: 100% !important; max-width: none !important; margin: 0 0 8px !important; } #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed .check_radio_field label, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed label.checkbox, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed label.radio, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed .checkbox label, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed .radio label { display: flex !important; align-items: flex-start !important; justify-content: flex-start !important; width: 100% !important; max-width: none !important; margin: 0 0 8px !important; padding: 0 !important; font-family: "Inter", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif !important; font-weight: 400 !important; line-height: 1.45 !important; text-align: left !important; } #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed label > input[type="radio"], #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed label > input[type="checkbox"] { float: none !important; } #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed .check_radio_field, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed .check_radio_field *, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed .checkbox, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed .radio { text-align: left !important; } /* Form spacing */ #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed .form_builder_output_element, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed .core_field, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed .additional_text, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed .country_wrap, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed .can_select { margin-bottom: 18px !important; } /* Submit button */ #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed .can_button, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed input[type="submit"], #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed button[type="submit"] { display: block !important; width: 100% !important; min-height: 54px !important; margin-top: 20px !important; padding: 14px 20px !important; background: var(--mwac-coral) !important; border: 2px solid var(--mwac-black) !important; border-radius: 0 !important; color: var(--mwac-black) !important; font-family: "Inter", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif !important; font-size: 1.06rem !important; font-weight: 700 !important; text-align: center !important; text-transform: none !important; letter-spacing: 0 !important; cursor: pointer; } #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed .can_button:hover, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed .can_button:focus, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed input[type="submit"]:hover, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed input[type="submit"]:focus, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed button[type="submit"]:hover, #can-event-area-focusgroup .can_embed button[type="submit"]:focus { background: var(--mwac-black) !important; color: #ffffff !important; } /* Sticky mobile invitation button */ .mwac-mobile-sticky-button { display: none; } @media (max-width: 600px) { .mwac-care-event { padding: 4px 14px 110px; font-size: 16px; } .mwac-care-opening { margin-right: -14px; margin-left: -14px; padding: 24px 20px; } .mwac-care-opening p { font-size: 1.3rem; } .mwac-jump-button { margin-bottom: 27px; padding: 15px 20px; } .mwac-event-details, .mwac-benefits, .mwac-support, .mwac-confidentiality { padding: 20px; } .mwac-eligibility { padding: 24px 2px; } .mwac-benefits ul { display: block; } .mwac-benefits li { margin-bottom: 9px; } .mwac-benefits li:last-child { margin-bottom: 0; } .mwac-care-event h2 { margin-top: 32px; } .mwac-form-section { padding: 23px 16px; } .mwac-mobile-sticky-button { position: fixed; z-index: 9999; right: 12px; bottom: 12px; left: 12px; display: block; padding: 15px 20px; background: var(--mwac-coral); border: 2px solid var(--mwac-black); color: var(--mwac-black); box-shadow: 0 4px 16px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.22); font-family: "Inter", Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 1.02rem; font-weight: 700; line-height: 1.1; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; transition: opacity 0.2s ease, visibility 0.2s ease; } .mwac-mobile-sticky-button:hover, .mwac-mobile-sticky-button:focus { background: var(--mwac-black); color: #ffffff; } .mwac-mobile-sticky-button.is-hidden { visibility: hidden; opacity: 0; pointer-events: none; } }

Join a private and confidential meeting for undocumented care workers.

Request an invitation Meeting details

Saturday, August 8
3:00–5:00 p.m.
In person in Toronto

The location will be shared only with people who are invited and confirmed to attend.

Who is this meeting for?

This meeting is for people who:

  • Live or work in the City of Toronto
  • Do not currently have valid immigration status in Canada
  • Currently work or have previously worked in care

The criteria for this meeting were set by the City of Toronto, which is funding this project.

Space is limited. We will review responses and contact people who are invited.

People who are invited and attend the full two-hour meeting will receive:
  • A $50 gift card
  • Food
  • PRESTO fare
Come meet other care workers and talk about:
  • Access to health care, housing, transit and other City services
  • What support undocumented care workers need
  • Problems at work, including low wages, unpaid wages, abuse or unfair treatment
  • Immigration status, permits and access to permanent residency
  • What needs to change in Toronto and across Canada

Your experiences will help us identify the changes, services and resources undocumented care workers need. We will also share information about services and support available in Toronto.

Need support or do not meet the criteria?

Contact us for support , join us as a member or call 437-518-8662.

This is a private and confidential process. Your name, immigration status, employer information and other personal information will not be shared with the City of Toronto, immigration authorities or your employer. We will not contact your current or former employer. Request an invitation

Share your information below. We will contact you if you are invited and send you the meeting location.

Request an invitation (function () { var registrationSection = document.getElementById("mwac-registration"); var stickyButton = document.getElementById( "mwac-mobile-register-button" ); if ( !registrationSection || !stickyButton || !("IntersectionObserver" in window) ) { return; } var observer = new IntersectionObserver( function (entries) { entries.forEach(function (entry) { if (entry.isIntersecting) { stickyButton.classList.add("is-hidden"); } else { stickyButton.classList.remove("is-hidden"); } }); }, { threshold: 0.08 } ); observer.observe(registrationSection); })();

The post Are you an Undocumented Care Worker in Toronto? Join Our Meeting. first appeared on Migrant Workers Alliance for Change.

The post Are you an Undocumented Care Worker in Toronto? Join Our Meeting. appeared first on Migrant Workers Alliance for Change.

Categories: C4. Radical Labor

New York governor orders first statewide data center moratorium

Grist - Sat, 07/18/2026 - 06:00

New York Governor Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, issued an executive order Tuesday that puts a moratorium on the construction of large-scale data centers.

The pause, which will last up to a year, is the nation’s first statewide ban on data centers, which have drawn increasing concern from lawmakers and citizens based on their impact on electricity prices and the energy grid.

“As data center development threatens to hike up utility bills, deplete our natural resources, and create uncertainty for New Yorkers, it’s my responsibility to take action and lead,” Hochul said in a statement.

Technology companies have invested billions of dollars to build data centers all across the country, driven in part by the computing demands from artificial intelligence.

In her executive order, Hochul directed the state Department of Public Service to issue no new permits for large-scale data centers for a  year. During that period, the agency will conduct an environmental analysis on the impacts of data centers, along with a proceeding to “require data centers to either pay more for their energy or supply their own.”

New York lawmakers passed a more extensive data center moratorium last month, but Hochul has not said whether she will sign the bill.

Read Next Climate activists take on a new foe: Data centers

Maine Governor Janet Mills, also a Democrat, vetoed a measure earlier this year that would have been the first statewide data center ban.

In a news release, Hochul also directed the state’s economic development agency to develop a framework that local communities can use to negotiate with tech companies that seek to construct data centers. That framework will focus on infrastructure improvements, child care investments, direct financial support, and labor and wage standards.

She also announced plans for a fund that would require data centers to invest in New York’s grid infrastructure and clean energy supply. And she called on lawmakers to repeal the state’s sales tax exemptions for large data centers.

Across the country, data centers have drawn vocal opposition at local public meetings and in state capitols. Several cities and counties will vote on ballot measures this year to restrict the development of new data centers.

This story was originally published by Grist with the headline New York governor orders first statewide data center moratorium on Jul 18, 2026.

Categories: H. Green News

Food Tank’s Weekly News Roundup: Right to Repair Won, School Enrollment Boosted, an Oil Pipeline Fought

Food Tank - Sat, 07/18/2026 - 04:00

Each week, Food Tank is rounding up a few news stories that inspire excitement, infuriation, or curiosity.

700,000 Dead from USAID’s Dismantling

An estimated 700,000 people have died from the dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development, according to Atul Gawande, USAID’s former Assistant Administrator for Global Health.

During a recent interview on The New Yorker Radio Hour, Gawande discussed what has happened in the aftermath of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cuts to USAID.

Elon Musk has repeatedly stated there’s no evidence that the cuts caused a single death. But Dr. Gawande says this simply isn’t true.  While the closure of USAID means that we also lost some of the best data and tracking systems, it is clear that the abrupt disappearance of aid supporting nutrition security and maternal health has led to devastating consequences. 

It takes years to recover the expertise and infrastructure of our global public health systems, eradicate preventable diseases, build surveillance for pandemics, reduce malnutrition, Gawande says. “And if we’re divided about that and it becomes political fodder, the institutions can’t function and we won’t be able to make a way forward. He argues it’s important to return to a place “where we believe that these kinds of institutions are what we all want.”

Ugandan Farmers Push Back against East African Oil Pipeline

A group of farmers in Uganda filed a lawsuit in the UK High Court against the East African Crude Oil Pipeline. 

In the lawsuit against the UK-registered company, the farmers allege the $5.6 billion project violates legislation that protects citizens’ right to a clean and healthy environment. They argue it affects more than 100,000 people—mostly producers—through land acquisition and threatens biodiversity by crossing through freshwater systems and protected habitats.

Avaaz, an NGO supporting the farmers, calls the litigation the “first-of-its-kind” and says it is a “global test case for whether new fossil fuel megaprojects can still be forced through despite mounting legal, financial, climate, and community opposition.” 

The project is being built to carry crude oil from Ugandan fields to Tanzania. According to developers, the 1,444 kilometer pipeline is nearly 80 percent complete. Avaaz says this is the “final chance to stop one of the worst oil pipelines on the planet.”

U.S. Farmers Win Right to Repair

Farmers in the United States secured the right to repair last week when the Federal Trade Commission reached a settlement with John Deere. 

Previously, faulty equipment could only be fixed by dealers authorized by John Deere. The company also kept independent repair companies from accessing the necessary tools. This drove up costs for farmers and increased wait times. 

Under the settlement, which was filed as part of a lawsuit in January 2025, this changes. The decision “enables farmers to do what they’ve done for generations—fix their own tractors and other farm equipment—without having to pay an authorized John Deere dealer to do it for them,” says Daniel Guarnera, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition.

‘Super’ El Nino May Cause Food Price Shock into 2028

Economists warn that the extreme weather events expected from El Niño may cause a nearly 16 percent spike in global food commodities that lasts into 2028.

Analysts at Goldman Sachs say countries are already seeing changes—with some regions of India receiving just a quarter of their usual rainfall—and the global impacts are likely to ramp up as we reach the end of 2026. 

The Iran war has already pushed world food prices to the highest levels in three years and El Nino means that supply chains now face “two shocks at once.” According to the Italian bank UniCredit, climateflation is “back on the agenda” as El Nino compounds the effects of the climate crisis.

A School Farm Program in Kenya Pays Off

In Kenya’s Kajiado County, one school has more than doubled enrollment thanks to a farm pilot program. 

Inaarok Lukuny Comprehensive School is one of four schools in Kajiado and Isiolo counties that were selected to convert unused land into working farms as part of a project led by the Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organisation alongside university partners, government agencies, and local groups. Inaarok converted dry, uncultivated land into a four-acre farm growing maize, beans, cowpeas, green grams, and leafy vegetables.

Inaarok’s head teacher says that the farm has allowed them to integrate more nutritious foods into school meals, which helped boost enrollment from 240 to more than 525 students over the last year.

Articles like the one you just read are made possible through the generosity of Food Tank members. Can we please count on you to be part of our growing movement? Become a member today by clicking here.

Photo courtesy of Unsplash

The post Food Tank’s Weekly News Roundup: Right to Repair Won, School Enrollment Boosted, an Oil Pipeline Fought appeared first on Food Tank.

Categories: A3. Agroecology

2026 FIFA World Cup & Extreme Heat

350.org - Sat, 07/18/2026 - 03:33

This is a guest blog by Peter Crisp of Fossil Free Football, a fan campaign aiming to kick big polluters out of the world’s favourite sport.  

The ongoing 2026 FIFA World Cup will likely be the hottest ever, produce more pollution than any event in history, and promote the world’s biggest oil company to billions of viewers. Yet it could also be a turning point. As football’s vulnerability to the climate crisis becomes impossible to ignore, more and more fans and players are calling for sporting authorities to do better.

The Heat Threat 

The climate crisis is fuelling extreme heat across the planet, driven by decades of burning coal, oil and gas. And the 2026 World Cup is not immune. Researchers predict that 14 out of 16 match venues this year will exceed dangerous temperatures with one in four matches expected to be played in hazardous heat conditions. Just last year, a June heat wave hit multiple World Cup host cities at once. A repeat this year could put attendees at real risk. On June 24 2025, it was 102F/39C  in Boston. This year, on June 23, England will play Ghana in that same city  in a stadium without shade (see below) at 4PM…

Gillette Stadium, Boston, which will be used during the tournament, offers little heat protection to fans and players. Source: Nathan Macoul, Unsplash


The heat threatens safety and changes the game itself. Extreme heat means slower tempo, less pressing and earlier substitutions. 97 of 104 scheduled matches face a higher probability of performance-impairing conditions due to climate change — meaning fans paying record prices are increasingly likely to watch a less intense game. And while players have medical teams and cooling breaks, fans are often left to fend for themselves. While 3 of the 16 venues are air-conditioned, fans in queues, fan zones and on transport routes can be exposed to dangerous heat for hours — often far longer than the players on the pitch.

The International Federation of Association Football or FIFA (which is the governing body of world football), has done little to keep fans and players safe from obvious heat risks during World Cups. We’ve already seen the consequences when it doesn’t: In June 2024, an assistant referee collapsed during a Copa America match, while last year’s Club World Cup saw players and fans sheltering inside as heat again became a major point of concern. Despite this, FIFA has selected many stadiums without any shade, in locations that are not typically used for summer sports. 

A group of experts recently told FIFA that it should do more to keep players and fans safe. They called for it to lower the temperature threshold at which matches are delayed. Currently, FIFA will only consider pausing play at 32°C (measured in Wet Bulb Globe Temperature or WBGT, a scale that accounts for heat, humidity and sun exposure together). That bar is so high that it wouldn’t be triggered at 45°C with 20% humidity, or 35°C with 80% humidity — conditions that would be dangerous for anyone, let alone athletes playing at full intensity. Seventy professional players have also publicly backed those calls. FIFA has added water breaks to all matches regardless of temperature — fundamentally altering the experience of the game — but experts say those breaks should be doubled to six minutes to properly protect players. Many fans have pointedly noted that FIFA may be equally motivated by the advertising slots these breaks create.

FIFA’s unserious attitude on heat risks extends to its broader engagement with the climate crisis. Despite holding a “green card for the planet” and committing to net-zero by 2040, FIFA President Gianni Infantino has massively expanded the tournament, and the pollution it will produce as a consequence. He has added an extra 16 teams and 60 matches, and spread the World Cup across North America so that huge amounts of flying are required. Researchers estimate the whole tournament will generate over 9 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent worth of pollution. 

FIFA President Gianni Infantino once held a ‘green card for the planet’ to show his commitment to sustainability. Source: FIFA

Promoting Fossil Fuels to Billions

FIFA’s massive emissions are worsened by its sponsorship choices. It is reportedly earning about $100m per year to advertise the world’s largest oil company, Aramco. Billions of fans are therefore now receiving pro-oil messaging, just as we must urgently move away from fossil fuels. 

Aramco is 98.5% owned by the Saudi state and is a dominant source of the regime’s funding, earning $33.6bn in the first quarter of this year. These profits have bankrolled Saudi Arabia’s recent push into world sport including football –  often framed as part of its post-oil ‘Vision 2030’ diversification strategy. But the fact that Aramco is being globally promoted, (instead of any other non-oil enterprise) makes clear these sports investments are about protecting fossil fuel profits, not moving away from them. Sponsorships have helped promote Saudi Arabia and shielded it from criticism of its commitment to fossil fuels. It’s clear that the Aramco deal too is part of a broader pro-oil strategy that includes blocking climate talks and ‘hooking’ poorer countries on its oil. 

SoFi stadium, Los Angeles, USA vs. Paraguay, June 13. Source: image supplied

Aramco has been given top billing, with its brand splashed around stadiums at kick off, including at the tournament opener. Notably, the fixture was a repeat of the 2010 World Cup, but nostalgic fans looking back to iconic images from that year might have noticed a surprising (and disturbing) difference. While the 2010 tournament was sponsored by solar energy, this one is promoting Big Oil. Aramco’s World Cup advertising centres around its supposed “innovation” ,but there is nothing innovative about drilling, extracting and burning fossil fuels. The real breakthroughs are in solar, battery storage and electric vehicles — technologies that are cleaner, cheaper and faster-growing than oil has ever been. 

Opening match of 2010 World Cup, featuring solar sponsorship.

The Bigger Picture: Global Access to Sport Under Threat 

This summer, the heat impacts felt by football’s elite will be impossible to miss. But if the climate crisis is reaching its most well resourced event, then grassroots football,  the foundation the whole game is built on,  is surely being hit much harder. For every high-profile match affected by heat, there are thousands more unseen players around the world that are harmed by heat or flooding rain. FIFA profits billions from an ever-expanding tournament and big oil sponsorship — but it is ordinary fans and players who bear the cost, in dangerous heat and a worsening climate, without seeing any of the cash.

Credit: Sadhin Mahmud, Unsplash

Climate Damage: the Ultimate Fan Ripoff  

Many football fans feel our loyalty is being exploited. FIFA’s incessant focus on profit is stripping away the essence of our beloved game — and we must use this discontent, linked to the climate crisis, as a powerful opportunity for change.

The pattern of FIFA’s constant prioritisation of revenue over tradition and affordability is consistent. Unprecedented prices for match tickets, public transport and fan zones. Commercial “hydration” breaks inserted into matches. Fans banned from bringing their own water. Big oil on the stadium hoardings. Everything FIFA does turns up the heat for supporters while lining its own pockets. Its response to obvious heat risks at the next two World Cups hosted by Morocco, Spain and Portugal, and then Saudi Arabia, has been to float moving the tournament to winter, discarding decades of tradition rather than addressing the cause.

Hundreds of millions of fans have every reason to demand better. As heat impacts worsen and the costs of fossil fuels become impossible to ignore, football lovers have real power to push for a fundamental reset that puts players and fans before FIFA’s bottom line.

Source: Quang Nguyen Vinh, Pexels

What Could Serious FIFA Climate Policy Look Like?

FIFA claims its core mission is to “unite the world” by making football accessible to all. Delivering on that mission means putting the climate first, because we can’t play in dangerous heat or on a flooded field. Here’s what that looks like in practice:

  • End the expansionist mentality. More teams, more matches, more flights means more pollution. Growth cannot come at the planet’s expense.
  • Revise heat guidelines. Current thresholds don’t protect players or fans. FIFA must lower the bar for match delays and take welfare seriously.
  • Ease the fixture calendar. An oversaturated schedule drives player burnout and unsafe conditions. Less is more.
  • Drop the polluters. Sponsorship deals with oil companies like Aramco must give way to partnerships with clean, innovative industries.
  • Put climate at the centre. Every decision FIFA makes should be guided by one question: does this make extreme weather worse?

The most popular sport on the planet needs to stop scoring ‘own goals’, and start playing for the right team.

If you’re a fan who is ready to take this message to your club or national association, connect with us at Fossil Free Football on social media and join our next online campaign session! 

The post 2026 FIFA World Cup & Extreme Heat appeared first on 350.

Categories: G1. Progressive Green

July 18 Green Energy News

Green Energy Times - Sat, 07/18/2026 - 03:29

Headline News:

  • “International Flights Set To Pay Carbon Costs Under EU’s Carbon Market Review From 2029” • The EU’s revised its carbon market rules to accelerate progress toward its climate goals. The new rules say international flights coming to the EU from origins within 5,000 km (3,100 miles) will be required to pay for their CO2 emissions starting in 2029. [Euronews]

Plane landing in Zurich (Pascal Meier, Unsplash)

  • “East Coast States Will Sue Trump for Illegal Payoffs” • Eight Attorneys General filed a notice of intent that they will challenge two unlawful payoffs from the Trump administration to energy companies. The administration paid energy companies nearly $2 billion in exchange for the companies to abandon offshore wind projects. [CleanTechnica]
  • “Severe Storms In France Leave At Least Two Dead And Over 50,000 Homes Without Power” • Thirty départements in central and eastern France were put on orange alert for thunderstorms on Thursday, with a risk of large hail. Power grid operator Enedis said nearly 53,000 households were affected by power outages following the severe storms. [Euronews]
  • “India Launches First Hydrogen-Powered Train Built In The Country” • India rolled out its first indigenously built, hydrogen-powered train, a move aimed at expanding use of clean energy in its vast rail network. The train has two driving cars powered by hydrogen and eight passenger coaches. It will operate in the northern state of Haryana. [ABC News]
  • “Ocean Winds Secures Go-Ahead For The 2-GW Caledonia Offshore Wind” • Ocean Winds has secured planning approval from Scottish ministers for the 2-GW Caledonia wind farm in the Moray Firth. The developer submitted separate applications for the 77-turbine Caledonia North and 78-turbine Caledonia South sites in November 2024. [reNews]

For more news, please visit geoharvey – Daily News about Energy and Climate Change.

Rasakan Kemenangan Besar Dari Tembak Ikan

Socialist Resurgence - Fri, 07/17/2026 - 20:55

daya tarik utama tembak ikan adalah peluang mendapatkan kemenangan besar melalui kombinasi kemampuan dan pengambilan keputusan yang tepat. Berbeda dengan anggapan bahwa kemenangan hanya bergantung pada keberuntungan, permainan ini juga membutuhkan pemahaman mengenai karakter setiap jenis ikan, nilai hadiah, hingga waktu terbaik untuk menembak target tertentu.

Pemain yang telah memiliki pengalaman biasanya akan lebih fokus mengincar ikan dengan peluang terbaik dibandingkan menghabiskan peluru secara sembarangan. Pendekatan seperti ini menunjukkan bahwa strategi menjadi bagian penting dalam meningkatkan efektivitas permainan.

Mengapa Banyak Pemain Menyukai Permainan Tembak Ikan?

Popularitas tembak ikan terus meningkat karena menawarkan pengalaman bermain yang santai namun tetap menegangkan. Efek visual yang menarik, animasi bawah laut yang hidup, hingga suara permainan yang dinamis mampu menciptakan suasana bermain yang menghibur.

Selain itu, terdapat berbagai jenis senjata dan fitur pendukung yang membuat permainan semakin variatif. Pemain dapat menyesuaikan kekuatan tembakan sesuai target sehingga setiap keputusan memiliki pengaruh terhadap hasil permainan.

Pengalaman para pemain juga menunjukkan bahwa memahami pola pergerakan ikan menjadi salah satu langkah yang cukup membantu dalam meningkatkan peluang memperoleh skor lebih tinggi. Hal tersebut membuktikan bahwa latihan dan pengalaman bermain memiliki peranan penting dalam membangun kemampuan pemain dari waktu ke waktu.

banyak komunitas pemain membagikan pengalaman mereka mengenai cara mengatur penggunaan peluru agar lebih efisien. Pendekatan tersebut sering menjadi referensi bagi pemain baru untuk memahami dasar-dasar permainan tanpa harus menghabiskan banyak percobaan.

strategi seperti memilih target bernilai tinggi, menghindari penggunaan peluru berlebihan, serta memanfaatkan fitur khusus merupakan teknik yang umum diterapkan oleh pemain berpengalaman.

dapat dilihat dari pentingnya memilih platform permainan yang memiliki reputasi baik, menyediakan sistem permainan yang transparan, serta menghadirkan layanan pelanggan yang responsif.

menjadi faktor penting karena keamanan data pengguna, proses transaksi yang jelas, serta informasi permainan yang terbuka akan memberikan rasa nyaman selama bermain.

Pada akhirnya, keempat prinsip tersebut membantu pemain menikmati permainan secara lebih bertanggung jawab dan percaya diri.

Strategi untuk Merasakan Kemenangan Besar

Apabila ingin memperoleh hasil yang lebih maksimal, ada beberapa strategi sederhana yang dapat diterapkan.

Pertama, hindari langsung menggunakan peluru dengan kekuatan maksimal sejak awal permainan. Amati terlebih dahulu pola pergerakan ikan dan sesuaikan kekuatan tembakan dengan target yang sedang dibidik.

Kedua, prioritaskan ikan yang bergerak lambat atau sedang berkumpul dalam jumlah banyak. Cara ini sering kali lebih efisien dibandingkan mengejar ikan besar yang bergerak sangat cepat.

Ketiga, manfaatkan fitur senjata khusus ketika peluang mendapatkan beberapa target sekaligus sedang terbuka. Penggunaan fitur pada waktu yang tepat dapat meningkatkan efektivitas permainan.

Selain strategi, disiplin dalam mengatur batas permainan juga menjadi kebiasaan yang baik. Dengan memiliki target yang jelas dan bermain secara terkontrol, pengalaman bermain akan terasa lebih menyenangkan tanpa mengurangi nilai hiburan yang ditawarkan.

Sebagai penutup, Rasakan Kemenangan Besar Dari Tembak Ikan bukan hanya tentang mengejar hadiah, melainkan menikmati setiap tantangan yang hadir selama permainan berlangsung. Dengan memahami mekanisme permainan, menerapkan strategi yang tepat, serta memilih platform yang terpercaya, peluang untuk memperoleh pengalaman bermain yang memuaskan akan semakin terbuka. Jadikan setiap sesi permainan sebagai hiburan yang seru, bermainlah secara bijak, dan nikmati sensasi berburu ikan dengan penuh percaya diri.

Categories: D2. Socialism

Backbone of the coast

Clayoquot Action - Fri, 07/17/2026 - 20:13

Standing in Tofino, looking out at the rainforest-covered mountains, you would never know that up the inlets, trouble is brewing…

Floating open-net pen fish farms dot the inlets. These facilities spread pathogens, parasites and poop, and are pushing wild salmon to the brink of extinction.

The crowded open net pen facilities do nothing to contain tiny viral particles or salmon lice. Most farms are infected with PRV, a deadly virus from the Atlantic ocean. Because fish breath through gills, it is dead-easy for a wild salmon migrating past to become infected. Salmon farms are parasite incubators. The lice pass freely through the nets to infest baby wild salmon, which are too young to have developed protective scales. One louse can be a fatal load…

Then there’s the poop and uneaten pellets. These simply drop out the bottom, smothering any creatures living on the ocean floor. One fish farm emits salmon sewage equivalent to a city of 150,000 people! And there are 20 fish farms in the Clayoquot Sound UNESCO Biosphere Region…

Removing fish farms works!

On a good note, removing fish farms from the ocean works. Forty percent of salmon farms in BC waters have been removed since 2020, thanks to First Nations on the east coast of Vancouver Island.

And those Nations are being richly rewarded, with abundant returns of wild salmon. This has been going on since 2022, when the first Pink salmon runs not exposed to fish farms returned to their natal streams. And every cycle, they return in greater abundance!

More good news: the Canadian government has banned open-net pen salmon farms from BC waters as of July 1st, 2029. This winter, the Federal Court of Appeal upheld the Minister’s right to use the precautionary principle when making decisions, noting the dire consequences that declining wild salmon stocks could have for First Nations rights, the economy, and the social fabric of British Columbia.

Tla-o-qui-aht First Nations stopped the loggers on Meares Island in 1985. During Clayoquot Summer 1993, nearly a thousand people chose to commit civil disobedience to protect ancestral forests. It paid off—30 years later, local First Nations were able to announce with the BC government that 62% of their territories is protected from industrial logging. Now it’s time to ensure wild salmon will continue to feed these rainforests for years to come!

130 First Nations want salmon farms removed from the ocean—along with 75% of British Columbians. Washington State has banned fish farms. BC is now the only jurisdiction on the west coast of North America allowing fish farms in the ocean.

As someone who loves, visits, or lives on the west coast, you have an opportunity to take a stand for wild salmon. Take action, no matter how small. Refuse to purchase farmed salmon—always ask your server ‘is your salmon wild or farmed?’. Please take a moment to sign our petition, reminding government officials that people like you care about protecting Nature.

Dan Lewis is Executive Director of Clayoquot Action.

The post Backbone of the coast appeared first on Clayoquot Action.

Categories: G2. Local Greens

With Rain Comes Life and a New Chapter at Mitchell Lake Audubon Center

Audubon Society - Fri, 07/17/2026 - 18:11
Spring rains have brought a burst of new life to Mitchell Lake Audubon Center, and this year, that renewal is paired with the start of a major new chapter for the center itself.A Landscape in...
Categories: G3. Big Green

Bending the Bird Curve, Together

Audubon Society - Fri, 07/17/2026 - 18:03
Every bird has a story. Some travel thousands of miles across continents. Others depend on a single type of habitat found only in a small corner of the world. Yet all birds share a common challenge:...
Categories: G3. Big Green

A Season of Transition, A Year of Growth: Trinity River Audubon Center Reflects

Audubon Society - Fri, 07/17/2026 - 17:59
As nature reminds us each season, change is a natural part of growth. This year, the Trinity River Audubon Center experienced its own season of transition, including changes in staff and leadership...
Categories: G3. Big Green

Texas Leaders in Conservation – Full Circle

Audubon Society - Fri, 07/17/2026 - 17:53
Every year, Texas Leaders in Conservation (TLC) hosts career panels for its students. Based on their career interests, the program's annual theme, and the availability of professionals, TLC brings...
Categories: G3. Big Green

Pages

The Fine Print I:

Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are not the official position of the IWW (or even the IWW’s EUC) unless otherwise indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone but the author’s, nor should it be assumed that any of these authors automatically support the IWW or endorse any of its positions.

Further: the inclusion of a link on our site (other than the link to the main IWW site) does not imply endorsement by or an alliance with the IWW. These sites have been chosen by our members due to their perceived relevance to the IWW EUC and are included here for informational purposes only. If you have any suggestions or comments on any of the links included (or not included) above, please contact us.

The Fine Print II:

Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc.

It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.