You are here
News Feeds
Why the transition beyond fossil fuels depends on cities and collective action
Irene Vélez Torres is Colombia’s Minister of Environment and Sustainable Development, and Mark Watts is Executive Director of C40 Cities.
The science is unequivocal. The world must transition away from fossil fuels. What remains uncertain is whether our institutions, economies and political systems are prepared to deliver the transformation required at the necessary speed and scale.
For too long, this transition has been framed as a technological substitution challenge. Replace fossil fuels with renewables and the problem is solved. But this view overlooks a deeper reality. Fossil fuels are embedded in economic systems shaped by extraction, inequality, and dependence. Moving beyond them requires structural transformation, not only of energy systems, but of the way economies are organised and governed.
This is both a global and a territorial challenge. And it is precisely at the intersection of national leadership and urban action where the transition becomes real.
Today, the energy system accounts for more than three-quarters of global greenhouse gas emissions, while fossil fuel expansion continues despite clear scientific warnings. This contradiction reflects entrenched financial and institutional incentives that continue to favour short-term extraction over long-term stability.
Recent global crises have exposed the consequences. Volatility in fossil fuel markets has translated into rising energy costs, fiscal pressure and growing inequality. A system that depends on geopolitical instability cannot guarantee reliable or affordable energy for people. Nor can it sustain resilient economies.
This is why Colombia has argued consistently in international spaces that the transition away from fossil fuels is not only an environmental necessity, but a matter of justice. It requires moving beyond an extractive model toward economies that protect life, redistribute opportunity and recognise the value of territories and communities.
In Colombia, the challenge is immediate. Fossil fuels represent a significant share of exports and public revenues, and entire regions depend on these industries. Addressing this reality demands deliberate strategies to overcome economic dependence, manage fiscal constraints, and enable productive re-conversion without reproducing new forms of extractivism.
But this transformation will not be delivered by national governments alone. Cities are not just implementers of policy. They are strategic actors in reshaping demand, accelerating innovation, and demonstrating that a different model is already possible.
Cities turn climate goals into real-life improvementsUrban areas account for the majority of global energy use and emissions. Yet they are also where the benefits of the transition are most immediate and visible. From expanding clean public transport to reducing air pollution, from improving energy efficiency in buildings to scaling decentralised renewable systems, cities are turning long-term climate goals into tangible improvements in people’s lives.
Across the C40 network, cities are already reducing emissions while strengthening economic resilience. These experiences show that transitioning away from fossil fuels lowers costs, improves public health and creates jobs. They also demonstrate something equally important: that climate action, when designed around people, can rebuild trust in public institutions.
Solar surge kept fossil electricity flat in 2025 as China and India made ‘historic’ shift
The Mayor of London has delivered the world’s largest clean air zone. Melbourne has enabled new wind farms that now supply 100% of municipal operations. In Curitiba, solar investments are cutting public energy bills by 30% while creating inclusive jobs.
Johannesburg’s US$140-million green bond, oversubscribed by 150%, has mobilised strong investment into clean energy and efficiency projects. And in Colombia, Bogotá established a low-emission zone (ZUMA) in a vulnerable neighborhood, improving air quality and public health for nearly 40,000 people.
A solar farm near the Brazilian city of Curitiba (Photo: C40 Cities) A solar farm near the Brazilian city of Curitiba (Photo: C40 Cities)These actions are part of a shared global effort to halve fossil fuel use in C40 cities by 2030, a goal that is not only achievable but already in motion. Crucially, it also contributes to the global target of tripling renewable energy capacity by the end of the decade, set by nearly 195 countries at COP28.
This is what makes cities indispensable to a just transition. They operate closest to citizens, where energy systems intersect with daily life. They are uniquely positioned to ensure that the transition is not only fast, but fair.
Structural barriers to national and urban actionAt the same time, cities cannot act in isolation. Their ability to lead depends on national frameworks that align policy, regulation and investment, as well as on an international system that enables rather than constrains transformation.
And this is where the global dimension becomes critical. Many countries in the Global South face structural barriers, including high borrowing costs, debt burdens and legal frameworks that limit policy space. Reforming the international financial architecture, expanding access to affordable finance, and addressing constraints are essential to unlocking both national and urban climate action.
Recognising this, Colombia and the Netherlands are convening the First Conference on Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels in Santa Marta. This is not a space for abstract commitments. It is a platform for implementation, designed to bring together those ready to move from ambition to action.
To phase out fossil fuels, developing countries need exit route from “debt trap”
Crucially, the conference places cities and subnational governments at the heart of this effort. Alongside national governments, civil society, workers, Indigenous peoples and the private sector, cities will help identify concrete enabling pathways to advance a just, orderly and equitable transition.
These pathways are not theoretical. They focus on three interconnected priorities: transforming energy supply and demand, overcoming economic dependence, and strengthening international cooperation. What cities bring to this agenda is the capacity to operationalise these priorities, translating them into policies that reshape infrastructure, mobility, housing and local economies.
Energy transition means redefining developmentThe objective is clear. To build a coalition of countries and cities willing to move forward, not by negotiating new principles, but by implementing them. A coalition that reflects a shared understanding that the transition must be grounded in equity, democratic participation and real delivery.
What is at stake goes beyond energy. It is about redefining development in a way that is compatible with climate stability and social justice.
The costs of delay are already evident. Continued investment in fossil fuel expansion deepens climate risk, economic vulnerability and inequality. By contrast, accelerating the transition opens pathways for more resilient, inclusive and sustainable economies.
Cities are already showing what this future looks like. National governments can scale it. International cooperation can enable it.
From Santa Marta, the message is clear. The end of the fossil fuel era is not only necessary. It is already underway. The task now is to ensure that it is just, that it is coordinated, and that it is irreversible.
The post Why the transition beyond fossil fuels depends on cities and collective action appeared first on Climate Home News.
Key words: Conjuncture
Chris Goldie unpacks the concept of conjuncture, and how theorists from Louis Althusser to Stuart Hall use it to analyse social formations
The post Key words: Conjuncture appeared first on Red Pepper.
The legal block on climate action
Wonnarua elder welcomes heritage listing of Ravensworth Homestead as a step to justice
Wonnarua elder Scott Franks has welcomed the NSW Government’s decision to list Ravensworth Homestead on the State Heritage Register, saying it is a critical step toward truth-telling and justice for Wonnarua people.
Tribal and Environmental Advocates Denounce Certification of Consistency Approval for the Delta Conveyance Project
Groups warn the project ignores state law, threatens important Tribal cultural sites and the health of the Delta ecosystem.
For Immediate Release:
April 23, 2026
Contact:
Ashley Castaneda, ashley@restorethedelta.org
Sacramento, CA – A coalition of tribes and environmental advocates expressed sharp criticism following the Delta Stewardship Council’s approval of the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) Certification of Consistency for the proposed Delta Conveyance Project (DCP). The coalition argues that the project violates state law and poses an imminent threat to Delta communities, its ecosystem and cultural heritage.The coalition, consisting of the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians, the Winnemem Wintu Tribe, San Francisco Baykeeper, Center for Biological Diversity, California Sportfishing Protection Alliance, Little Manila Rising, Friends of the River, California Indian Environmental Alliance, Sierra Club California and Restore the Delta, appealed the Certificate of Consistency late last year, citing the project would:
- Irreparably harm Tribal Cultural Resources including cultural sites, burial grounds and traditional use areas – highlighting the lack of any meaningful Tribal consultation
- Intensify environmental harm by increasing diversions from the Delta, reducing protective water flows for threatened fish species and increasing harmful algal blooms
- Worsen environmental injustices, placing disproportionate burdens on Delta residents including low-income, Tribal and Latino communities
- Increase water reliance on the Delta, directly contradicting Delta Plan requirements, and weakening water flow protections
In the decision, the Council did defer back to the DWR two important issues related to the Golden Mussel and Sacramento Sewer’s Water program for further review. Rather than resolving these concerns within the proceeding, the draft decision directs DWR to consider whether additional measures are warranted, but only requires changes where deemed feasible.
STATEMENTS FROM COALITION MEMBERS:
Malissa Tayaba, Vice Chair, Chingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians:
“Consistency with a plan meant to ensure co-equal goals can only be achieved by projects that treat Delta tribal and environmental water goals as truly equal. The Delta Conveyance Project treats our goals as less equal than the goal of diverting more water out of the Delta. The fact that the Governor’s appointees determined otherwise doesn’t change this fundamental reality. Yet again we are seeing political expediency win out over commitments to a healthy estuary. We will continue fighting against this destructive project.”
Gary Mulcahy, Government Liaison at Winnemem Wintu Tribe:
“The Delta Stewardship Council does not know the legality of what they ruled on because DWR’s documents do not support the consistency of the project for Tribes, environmental justice communities and fisheries. It’s just another giveaway to the Newsom Administration and DWR before the Governor leaves office.
Eric Buescher, Managing Attorney, San Francisco Baykeeper:
“The Delta Stewardship Council’s decision to accept DWR’s Certification of Consistency with the Delta Reform Act contradicts evidence and records provided by the coalition. “The Delta Reform Act was passed to protect, restore, and enhance the ecosystem of the San Francisco Bay-Delta and to preserve the Delta as a place. The Delta Conveyance Project would do the opposite.
The Stewardship Council’s decision to conclude that this project is consistent with the co-equal goals of the Act is disappointing and inconsistent with the law and the evidence. The Council’s decision ignores the big picture and common sense in favor of a cramped understanding of the statute and of the Delta itself. In doing so, the Council abandons the co-equal goals and abandons the Delta.”
Christie Ralston, Associate Attorney, San Francisco Baykeeper:
“Today, the Delta Stewardship Council ignored clear defects in the Draft Decision on the appeals of the Department of Water Resource’s Certification of Consistency for the Delta Conveyance Project. It did this in order to ram through the governor’s desire to break ground on the Delta Tunnel as soon as possible regardless of the impacts on Delta wildlife, ecosystems, economies, communities, and Tribes.
In denying the many appeals the Council received, it has allowed DWR to sweep under the rug the devastating effects the Tunnel could have for years to come. And the breakneck speed at which the Council moved in making its decision robbed the public, appellants, and even the Council members themselves from being able to digest the Decision and meaningfully engage with it. Disappointingly, the Delta Stewardship Council has failed in its role as steward of the Delta.”
Barbara Barrigan-Parrilla, Executive Director at Restore the Delta adds, “Today’s Delta Stewardship Council meeting and vote was farcical. They failed to consider the vast majority of documented records by appellants as they twisted regulations to justify their political actions. Citing incorrectly that the Council followed the law proves that Newsom appointees do not have the backbone to learn and implement the law accurately. We are disappointed but not surprised.”
###
Protected: Equitable Building Decarbonization [waiting for title]
To view this protected post, enter the password below:
Password:
Submit
The post Protected: Equitable Building Decarbonization [waiting for title] appeared first on Asian Pacific Environmental Network.
Agrarian Reform, Agroecology and Food Sovereignty: ICARRD+20
Nurses applaud passage of critical A.I. bills out of committee
Plastic Policy is Public Health Policy
Since Philadelphia banned single-use plastic bags in 2021, more than 200 million of them have been kept out of the city’s waste stream, streets, and tree branches.
This is huge progress and a clear example of the power of public policy. But the harm of plastics is not limited to our natural environment. We urge Philadelphians to consider how plastics affect our health, too.
When the Clean Air Council was founded in 1967, Americans were fighting smog and rivers so polluted that they caught fire. Those problems have not disappeared, but today we also face less visible dangers. Chemicals used in plastics, including bisphenols and phthalates, have been linked to reproductive harm, metabolic disorders, diabetes, and some cancers.
That growing concern is reflected in the new Netflix documentary The Plastic Detox, which follows couples trying to reduce their exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals while navigating infertility.
The film raises a question that should concern all of us: How can we protect ourselves from harmful plastic-related chemicals when plastic is woven into so much of daily life?
There are steps individuals can take. People can avoid thermal paper receipts, choose natural fibers over synthetic ones, and replace plastic food and drink containers with glass, stainless steel, wood, or ceramic when possible. But individual choices can only go so far.
The burden should not fall on people to “detox” from a system they did not create. Public policy should make healthier choices easier and safer materials more available and affordable.
And we should be honest about how little of our plastic waste is actually recycled: only about 6%. Millions of tons are still sent to landfills, and millions more are burned.
That matters here in Philadelphia, where city officials are negotiating new waste disposal contracts.
Chester residents, along with Clean Air Council and other advocates, are urging the city to stop sending trash to the Reworld incinerator – the nation’s largest. The Stop Trashing Our Air Act, introduced by Councilmember Jamie Gauthier, would prohibit Philadelphia from contracting with companies that burn municipal waste.
If we are serious about reducing the harm of plastics, we cannot act as though disposal is someone else’s problem.
Philadelphia’s plastic bag ban showed that local action works. Now the city and the state should build on that progress by reducing unnecessary plastic use, expanding policies that limit exposure, and making safer alternatives more common once again. Pennsylvania should also stop lagging behind other states on actions to reduce single-use plastics.
Plastic policy is public health policy, we need to treat it that way.
Migrant Summer: Status Now!
Join migrants, allies, and supporters across Canada from June 21–28 for a Migrant Summer Week of Action. We’re stepping up our action in response to the federal government’s cuts to permanent and temporary residency levels and the passing of Bill C-12, as we build toward our mass day of action with allies in the Migrant Rights Network on September 20, 2026.
When the summer heats up, so do our issues: unpredictable weather and wildfires, unsafe and un-air conditioned housing, stolen wages, lack of work, not enough income to eat or send money home, and mass permit expiries. We’re exhausted and stressed, but we’re getting ready to fight back.
Sign up now to stay connected. You’ll get updates on local actions, digital actions, and ways to get involved during Migrant Summer and beyond.
Digital action matters, too. Can’t attend? Show your solidarity by joining us in taking digital action on social media, or signing and sharing our petitions.
By coming together, we’re showing the federal government and employers that we’re not going to stay silent. Migrants deserve the same rights and protections as everyone else.
As the summer gets hotter, so will our struggle. We can’t keep waiting for change — this year, we will be the change.
Find an actionSearch for events near you and RSVP inline.
(function () { var areaId = "can-event_campaign-area-migrant-summer-status-now"; function normalize(text) { return (text || "").replace(/\s+/g, " ").trim(); } function hideElement(el) { if (!el) return; el.classList.add("mwac-hidden"); el.setAttribute("aria-hidden", "true"); } function fieldNameMatch(text) { var t = normalize(text).toLowerCase().replace(/\*/g, "").trim(); return ( t === "first name" || t === "last name" || t === "email" || t === "mobile number" || t === "phone" || t === "zip/postal code" || t === "postal code" || t === "zip code" ); } function isTextLikeInput(input) { if (!input || !input.tagName) return false; var tag = input.tagName.toLowerCase(); var type = (input.getAttribute("type") || "").toLowerCase(); return ( tag === "textarea" || type === "text" || type === "email" || type === "tel" || type === "number" || type === "search" ); } function setPlaceholder(input, text) { if (!input || !text) return; var clean = text.replace(/\*/g, "").trim(); if (!clean) return; input.setAttribute("placeholder", clean); input.setAttribute("aria-label", clean); } function hideNearbyFieldTitles(area, input) { if (!isTextLikeInput(input)) return; var candidates = []; if (input.id) { try { candidates = candidates.concat(Array.from(area.querySelectorAll('label[for="' + input.id + '"]'))); } catch (e) {} } if (input.parentElement) { candidates = candidates.concat(Array.from(input.parentElement.children)); } if (input.parentElement && input.parentElement.parentElement) { candidates = candidates.concat(Array.from(input.parentElement.parentElement.children)); } var prev = input.previousElementSibling; while (prev) { candidates.push(prev); prev = prev.previousElementSibling; } candidates.forEach(function (el) { if (!el || el === input) return; if (el.querySelector && el.querySelector("input, textarea, select, button")) return; var text = normalize(el.textContent); if (!fieldNameMatch(text)) return; setPlaceholder(input, text); hideElement(el); }); } function addEventClasses(area) { var candidates = area.querySelectorAll("li, article, div"); candidates.forEach(function (el) { if (!el || el.classList.contains("mwac-an-event")) return; var text = normalize(el.textContent); if (!text || text.length < 25 || text.length > 500) return; var hasViewButton = /view event/i.test(text); var hasDate = /(jan|feb|mar|apr|may|jun|jul|aug|sep|oct|nov|dec|am|pm)/i.test(text); var hasLocation = /toronto|niagara|new brunswick|moncton|fredericton|shediac|park|street|st\b|ave\b|road|rd\b/i.test(text); if (hasViewButton && hasDate && hasLocation) { el.classList.add("mwac-an-event"); if (!el.querySelector(".mwac-an-tag")) { var tag = document.createElement("div"); var lower = text.toLowerCase(); if (/(toronto|niagara)/i.test(lower)) { tag.className = "mwac-an-tag teal"; tag.textContent = "Toronto / Niagara"; el.insertBefore(tag, el.firstChild); } else if (/(new brunswick|moncton|fredericton|shediac)/i.test(lower)) { tag.className = "mwac-an-tag coral"; tag.textContent = "New Brunswick"; el.insertBefore(tag, el.firstChild); } } var actionLinks = el.querySelectorAll("a, button, input[type='submit']"); actionLinks.forEach(function (link) { var label = normalize(link.textContent || link.value); if (/view event/i.test(label)) { link.classList.add("mwac-an-view"); } }); } }); } function addDetailClasses(area) { area.querySelectorAll("form").forEach(function (form) { var container = form.closest("div"); if (container && !container.classList.contains("mwac-an-detail")) { var text = normalize(container.textContent).toLowerCase(); if (/rsvp|attend this event|send rsvp|first name|last name|email/.test(text)) { container.classList.add("mwac-an-detail"); } } }); } function hideActionNetworkBranding(area) { area.querySelectorAll("img, svg").forEach(function (el) { var meta = ( normalize(el.getAttribute("alt")) + " " + normalize(el.getAttribute("aria-label")) + " " + normalize(el.getAttribute("title")) ).toLowerCase(); var wrap = el.closest("a, div, span, p") || el; var wrapText = normalize((wrap.textContent || "")).toLowerCase(); if ( meta.indexOf("action network") !== -1 || meta.indexOf("actionnetwork") !== -1 || wrapText === "action network" || wrapText === "powered by action network" ) { hideElement(wrap); } }); } function cleanWidget() { var area = document.getElementById(areaId); if (!area) return; area.querySelectorAll("input, textarea, select").forEach(function (input) { hideNearbyFieldTitles(area, input); }); addEventClasses(area); addDetailClasses(area); hideActionNetworkBranding(area); } function startCleanup() { cleanWidget(); var area = document.getElementById(areaId); if (!area) return; var observer = new MutationObserver(function () { cleanWidget(); }); observer.observe(area, { childList: true, subtree: true }); setTimeout(cleanWidget, 400); setTimeout(cleanWidget, 1200); setTimeout(cleanWidget, 2500); setTimeout(cleanWidget, 5000); } if (document.readyState === "loading") { document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", startCleanup); } else { startCleanup(); } })();The post Migrant Summer: Status Now! first appeared on Migrant Workers Alliance for Change.
The post Migrant Summer: Status Now! appeared first on Migrant Workers Alliance for Change.
Advocates urge CA officials to oppose Trump’s Drill Baby Drill’ agenda, stop expediting new oil permits
The post Advocates urge CA officials to oppose Trump’s Drill Baby Drill’ agenda, stop expediting new oil permits appeared first on Last Chance Alliance.
Terry Tempest Williams – The Glorians Are Among Us
Terry Tempest Williams, one of our nation’s living literary treasures and a guiding light for many of us regarding ethics and citizenship, shares how she emerged from a dream during the pandemic in 2020 with a renewed vow she had forgotten. In this time of political and climate chaos, as we seek beauty and cohesion wherever we can find its glimmer, Terry focused on “The Glorians,” the overlooked presences—animal, plant, memory, moment—that reveal our shared vulnerability and interconnectedness with the natural world and how they can inspire us to carry forward with grace. “The Glorians are reaching out to us,” she writes,” inviting us to dream a new world into being.”
This talk was delivered at the 2026 Bioneers Conference.
Terry Tempest Williams, a writer, educator, and environmental activist known for her lyrical and impassioned prose, is the author of over twenty creative nonfiction books including the environmental literature classic, Refuge – An Unnatural History of Family and Place, and: The Open Space of Democracy, Finding Beauty in a Broken World, When Women Were Birds, and Erosion – Essays of Undoing. Her most recent book is the The Glorians – Visitations from the Holy Ordinary (spring ’26). A Recipient of Guggenheim and Lannan literary fellowships, Ms. Williams’ work has appeared widely, including in The New York Times, The New Yorker, The Progressive, and Orion, and has been translated worldwide. A member of the American Academy of Arts and Letters, she is currently Writer-in-Residence at the Harvard Divinity School.
Learn more at terrytempestwilliams.com
EXPLORE MORE Terry Tempest Williams: Noticing the Glorians in a Fractured WorldIn a recent conversation with Bioneers co-founder Nina Simons, Terry Tempest Williams reflects more personally on the inner terrain behind her work — art, activism, spirituality, and the discipline of staying open. She speaks to grief as a form of love, to community as a site of imagination, and to the quiet but radical act of not looking away. As she describes it, “finding beauty in a broken world is creating beauty in the world we find.”
Erosion and Evolution: Our Undoing is Our BecomingIn this podcast episode, Terry Tempest Williams asks: How do we find the strength to not look away at all that is breaking our hearts? Hands on the earth, we remember where the source of our authentic power comes from.
The post Terry Tempest Williams – The Glorians Are Among Us appeared first on Bioneers.
Speculation and Greed Explain the Price of Gasoline, not Supply and Demand
The economic impacts of the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran were felt by Canadians within hours of its launch. Prices for gasoline, diesel, and home heating oil (widely used in Atlantic Canada) shot up very quickly. This is both surprising and infuriating—since those products were produced, refined, and delivered long before the war started. Why do consumers have to pay more, given the war had no impact on the cost of production?
Centre for Future Work director Jim Stanford pursued this question in a commentary originally published in the Toronto Star.
Policy Choices, not Market Forces, Explain Why We’re Getting Soaked at the Pump… Again By Jim StanfordFor beleaguered consumers, it’s déjà vu all over again. War breaks out on the other side of the world. Within 24 hours, gasoline prices take off – rising up to 50 cents a litre on average across Canada since the war started. Natural gas and heating oil prices will follow, along with costs for anything that uses petroleum intensively (like transportation services, food, and construction).
It’ll get worse when the Bank of Canada jumps into the fray with higher interest rates to counteract renewed inflation. Then the victims of oil-fired inflation will be punished again.
We’ve seen this movie before. Sadly, we haven’t learned its lessons.
In February 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine – a country that does not produce significant amounts of oil. World oil prices soared 65% in weeks, propelled unduly by speculative bets placed on financialized futures markets.
Prices subsided by the end of the year, after it became clear world oil supply was unaffected by that war (which still drags on). But the damage was done. The 2022 oil spike was the biggest single cause of the resulting inflation that caused such turmoil around the world.
In Canada, that surge in oil prices directly accounted for 43% of post-pandemic inflation, which peaked at 8% four months later. The indirect costs were even bigger: including price hikes on energy-intensive products, subsequent higher interest rates, and job losses as high rates chilled the aggregate economy. I have estimated that the cumulative toll for Canadian consumers from the 2022 oil price surge exceeded $200 billion over three years – a staggering $12,000 per household.
Now prices are soaring again, following U.S.-Israeli attacks and Iranian counter-attacks. Before banging their heads against the nearest brick wall over the prospect of a painful sequel, consumers should pause to ask two fundamental questions. Why must we pay so much more for oil and gas produced, processed, and consumed right here in Canada, with no connection to the Middle East whatsoever? And who benefits from this outcome?
The gasoline stored in pumps right now sells for much more than before the war started. But it was refined weeks ago, from oil extracted months ago. Canada produces far more oil than it consumes; three-quarters of our production is exported. Of the modest volumes imported into eastern Canada, almost none comes through the Persian Gulf.
So there’s no energy ‘supply shock’ in Canada. The cost of producing and refining gasoline hasn’t changed at all. Yet Canadian consumers are already being soaked. And the worst is yet to come.
Petroleum companies profit immensely from this gap between soaring revenues and steady costs. That produced historic petroleum profits after the Ukraine invasion – almost $1 trillion worldwide in 2022 alone. In Canada, after-tax petroleum profits (upstream and downstream) totaled $154 billion from 2022 through 2024, when the inflationary burst finally subsided. That propelled after-tax corporate profits to 21% of Canadian GDP in 2022 (the highest share in history), even as Canadians struggled with affordability.
This new war has roiled real oil supplies (not just futures markets), so the price shock will likely be worse and longer lasting. But it’s not inevitable that we should tolerate the resulting economy-wide inflation and higher interest rates here at home.
Regulation could curtail the speed and extent to which foreign shocks are reflected in domestic prices. Energy prices could be tied to the actual cost of production (like we already do with electricity). And accelerating the transition to hydro, wind, solar, and geothermal (none of which traverse the Straits of Hormuz!) would further protect us.
Of course, petroleum lobbyists complain that insulating Canadian oil prices from global chaos will cause price ‘distortions’. But it’s hard to imagine anything more distortionary than inflicting another pointless cycle of inflation followed by contraction on an entire national economy – one that is blessed with far more energy than it needs.
The oil industry’s preferred solution to everything – build more export pipelines – would clearly make affordability even worse. New LNG projects, in particular, will amplify upward pressure on domestic gas prices, something the Alberta government’s recent provincial budget explicitly celebrated.
Perhaps Canada can’t do much about interminable conflict in the Middle East. But we can certainly do more to protect our own economy from its fallout.
The post Speculation and Greed Explain the Price of Gasoline, not Supply and Demand appeared first on Centre for Future Work.
Annotated Bibliography on the Net Employment Benefits of the Energy Transition
Investments in sustainable energy and energy conservation are larger than investments in fossil fuel energy systems. Moreover, the work involved is more labour-intensive than fossil fuel projects (which have very small labour inputs relative to the scale of capital investments or GDP). For both reasons, the shift from fossil fuels to sustainable alternatives will definitely create far more jobs than are lost in fossil fuel industries as the economy transitions to net-zero.
This is a summary of previous research on the net employment benefits of sustainable energy projects, and other dimensions of the energy transition. It reviews several studies of the employment impacts of renewable energy and related investments in Canada, and then several international reports on parallel trends in the global economy.
Previous Canadian Studies- In a report for the Pembina Institute, Kaddoura et al. (2020) forecast potential new employment in four areas of emissions-reducing investment in Alberta, over a ten-year period. The report estimated that over 67,000 new jobs would be created in the province over a decade, driven by investments in four broad areas: renewable electricity generation, public transit and electric vehicle infrastructure, energy efficiency improvements in buildings and industry, and a program of remediation and methane reduction in oil and gas extraction facilities. That is enough new employment to offset two-thirds of all jobs in the province’s existing petroleum industry.
- In neighbouring B.C., Lee and Klein (2020) estimated the employment impacts of investing 2% of provincial GDP in renewable energy and energy conservation initiatives (as proposed by Nicholas Stern in his landmark international report, 2006). They projected an investment programme of this scale would create and maintain 42,000 jobs in the provincial economy – far more than are presently supported by fossil fuel industries in that province. Due to the higher labour content of alternative energy and related products, shifting investment from fossil fuel production to renewable energy, energy efficiency, and decarbonized transportation systems generates net employment growth.
- Another provincial-focused study was published by the Ecology Action Centre (2019) for Nova Scotia. This research simulated the employment impacts of a programme to reduce provincial GHG emissions by 50% by 2030, in line with Canada’s Paris Agreement commitments. Investments in renewable energy generation, energy efficiency, and public transit would support the creation of 15,000 net new jobs in Nova Scotia – and thousands more spin-off jobs elsewhere in Canada. The province would benefit from expanded GDP growth, enhanced tax revenue, and $675 million in additional annual personal income (measured in real 2019 dollar terms).
- A project initiated by the David Suzuki Foundation modeled the investment and technological dimensions of an ambitious effort to expand and decarbonize Canada’s electricity system, through the rapid deployment of renewable power sources and conversion of heating, transportation, and industrial energy uses to electric power (Thomas and Green, 2022). The report also estimated the employment effects of this investment programme, which would achieve a net-zero electricity system by 2035. The analysis considered only direct construction and operation jobs associated with economy-wide electrification; it did not include indirect (upstream) or induced (downstream) spin-off jobs (such as jobs in manufacturing activities spurred by electrification), nor jobs in other emerging technologies (such as battery storage). In this regard, the forecast is very conservative. The report expects about 75,000 new jobs related to electricity generation and infrastructure to be created over the first 15 years of investment. Proportionately, the largest job growth is experienced in Alberta and Saskatchewan, where the GDP and employment gains from electrification are especially significant.
- Jobs for Tomorrow (Bridge and Gilbert, 2017), focused on the impacts of the energy transition for employment among building and construction trades. That report catalogued likely investments across three broad categories of emissions-reduction activity: renewable energy generation and transmission; building energy efficiency and district energy systems; and transportation. It then estimated employment impacts of those projects on the basis of previously published employment coefficients. Across those three categories of activity, the report projected that a total of 3.3 million person-years of employment would be created in construction trades by 2050. Two-thirds of that growth was concentrated in non-residential construction (as builders updated existing structures, and built new ones, to incorporate rigorous new energy efficiency standards). Clearly, the massive investments required to facilitate the energy transition in Canada and meet international emissions-reduction commitments imply very strong ongoing demand for construction trades work.
- A sequel to that 2017 report, now titled Jobs for Today, updated those projections of construction jobs arising from major investments in renewable energy systems, energy conservation, and sustainable transportation (Bridge and Stanford, 2025). This report surveyed evidence on the impacts of sustainable energy investments that are already visible on Canadian labour markets. Then it forecast the scale of investment spending that would be required to meet Canada’s official net-zero commitments in three broad areas: the full range of non-emitting energy systems (hydro, solar, wind, geothermal, nuclear, and tidal) and associated transmission investments; investments in energy-efficient buildings and community infrastructure (including new super-efficient industrial, commercial, and institutional buildings, retrofits of existing buildings, and energy-conserving district energy systems), and investments in sustainable transportation systems (including EV charging networks, urban public transit, and high-speed inter-city rail). The application of employment coefficients derived from official economic data and other published data can then translate those investment forecasts into employment projections. These investments are forecast to support the creation of 6.3 million to 9.5 million jobs years of work for construction and building trades workers – equivalent to an average of 235,000 to 350,000 new jobs on average over the next 25 years. The estimates do not include indirect or spin-off jobs in supply chains or associated manufacturing.
- A deeper dive into the impacts of the energy transition for one specific trade – electricians – was undertaken by Electricity Human Resources Canada (2023). This report compiled estimates of new jobs arising from the expansion of renewable energy generation, along with transmission expansion and upgrades. The shift to renewable energy and electrification will accelerate demand for electricians considerably. The report projects net job growth of 12,000 positions in the five years ending in 2028. That is on top of the need to replace over 15,000 anticipated electrician retirements in the same period. There is no doubt that electricians are an occupation with increasing employment opportunities in coming years. The report urged additional investments in training and apprenticeships by employers and governments.
- Another specific construction trade that will experience new job opportunities from the growing focus on energy conservation is insulators. Calvert and Crabtree (2022) and Calvert (2023) relate the experience of Local 131 of the insulators’ union (in New Brunswick), which pro-actively undertook an independent program of free energy audits for owners of commercial and industrial buildings. The goal was to highlight for building owners the operational and cost savings from upgraded insulation and energy conservation upgrades. The campaign was successful and generated significant amounts of new work for members of the union. Other insulator union locals have also launched industry awareness programs to promote energy retrofits, similarly generating new work opportunities for union members (Calvert and Tallon, 2016; Calvert, 2019).
- The positive employment effects of electrification were further explored in a report by the David Suzuki Foundation (Thomas and Green, 2022). This report mapped the investments required to support deep electrification of Canada’s economy, on the strength of massive investments in renewable energy generation, transmission, distribution and storage facilities. To decarbonize existing electricity generation (by 2035, as per existing federal standards), and then meet the extra demand for electricity from the spread of emissions-free technologies in other sectors (such as transportation and heating), an 18-fold increase in total wind and solar generation will be needed by 2050. Some 1.5 million person-years of work will be created in the construction, operation, and maintenance of new wind and solar generating capacity, and associated battery storage. The implications of this ambitious electrification strategy for carbon emissions are hopeful: this plan would reduce emissions by a cumulative total of 3.2 billion tonnes in the period to 2050.
- Clean Energy Canada has published successive reports estimating employment growth in what it calls Canada’s “clean energy economy” (Clean Energy Canada, 2019, 2021; Navius Research, 2019). The research estimated that as of 2020 some 430,000 jobs already existed in a broadly-defined clean energy sector: including renewable energy production and distribution, construction and retrofit of energy efficient buildings, clean energy transportation, and specialized clean energy industries (such as low-carbon machinery, and emission detection and control). That was an increase of over 130,000 jobs (or over one-third) from 2017. And under the climate policy outlook adopted by the federal government, clean energy jobs were forecast to grow by another 200,000 positions by 2030 – outweighing a projected decline in fossil fuel-related employment of 125,000 positions over the same time. Clean Energy Canada’s modeling confirms net gains in employment from the transition to clean energy will be experienced in all parts of Canada, including in fossil fuel-producing provinces.
- A separate report prepared for Clean Energy Canada by Dunsky Energy Consulting (2018) considered the macroeconomic and employment effects from energy efficiency improvements, as mandated in the previous federal-provincial Pan Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change. The Dunsky modeling traces several channels of impact from the energy efficiency provisions of that federal-provincial agreement: including energy efficiency standards in new buildings, retrofits of existing buildings, new energy efficiency standards in appliances and equipment, and industrial energy efficiency. Those efficiency improvements were expected to meet 25% of Canada’s Paris commitments for emissions reduction. The economic stimulus from energy efficiency comes from two major channels: increased demand for efficiency-related goods and services (including building construction and retrofit), and reallocated savings on energy costs by consumers and businesses (which redeploy their energy savings into other forms of expenditure). Those effects more than offset the reduced economic activity associated with energy production resulting from reduced demand for the energy. The jobs impact of the efficiency improvements was estimated at an average net gain in ongoing employment of 118,000 over a 13-year period (to 2030), and a 1% increase in national GDP over the baseline trajectory.
- Xuereb and Hillel (2023) simulated the employment impacts of an ambitious programme of proposed investment in a range of energy transition and conservation initiatives, worth a cumulative total of $287 billion over five years. (The details of this investment programme are described in Lee et al., 2023.) Based on an allocation of investment spending across different components of activity associated with each project category, this research estimated that investments on this scale would support between 187,000 and 226,000 new jobs by the fifth year of the programme. The ‘low’ estimate includes only direct and supply-chain jobs associated with the new investments; the ‘high’ estimate includes downstream jobs in consumer industries, stimulated by the increased incomes (and hence consumer spending) generated in the renewable energy and related industries.
- Researchers at RBC mapped the intersectoral employment transitions and associated skills and training requirements resulting from the shift to a net-zero economy in Canada (Guldimann and Powell, 2022). Like other research, this study projected enormous job-creation potential in clean energy, infrastructure, energy conservation, and related fields. The study forecasts between 235,000 and 400,000 new jobs will be created in occupations whose tasks and qualifications have changed because of the energy transition. That total job-creation would be even larger if Canada stepped up its investments in new energy systems; the report estimates $60 billion per year in incremental capital spending estimated is necessary to meet climate targets. New work in these evolving and emerging occupations will substantially outweigh the gradual decline in employment in traditional fossil fuel energy production and use. RBC expects existing skills shortages for construction, managerial, technical, and manufacturing workers to become even more pressing as the energy transition gathers pace, and these net new jobs are created. The report calls for urgent action by governments, employers, and educators to prepare for the coming surge in demand for skilled workers in fields related to sustainable energy.
- The Centre for Future Work developed a detailed breakdown of the various channels through which employment adjustments can be facilitated during a gradual phase-out of fossil fuel production and use, and corresponding ramp up of renewable energy and energy conservation projects (Stanford, 2021). In this forecast, a gradual phase-out of direct fossil fuel-related employment (estimated at 159,000 jobs across Canada in 2019, or 0.9% of total employment) would be possible over a 20- or 25-year phase-out (consistent with reaching net-zero targets by 2050), with no involuntary layoffs. Much of this transition would be facilitated through retirements, since workers in fossil fuel industries are older than the economy-wide average. New jobs created in renewable energy and other sustainable activities (including amelioration of former fossil fuel production sites) would be important in smoothing the transition. But there are many other pathways through which fossil fuel jobs could also be replaced, including through job-creation in other sectors (such as construction, non-fossil minerals, transportation, and private and public services). Supports for the roughly 4000 non-retiring fossil fuel workers who would need redeployment each year (according to that phase-out timeline) could include income insurance programs, retraining supports, relocation incentives, and small business start-up grants. Successful transition plans in other examples of fossil fuel phase-out (including Germany’s gradual shut-down of black coal mining, or Ontario’s phase-out of coal-fired electricity) prove that gradual, supported transitions of this sort can be accomplished without lay-offs, so long as timelines are long and gradual, and affected workers are supported with a portfolio of adjustment supports.
All countries are grappling with the economic and labour market issues related to the energy transition, and there is now a large body of international research attesting to the powerful employment-creating effects of major renewable energy and emissions-reduction investments. Here we summarize a few of the more notable international research efforts:
- The International Energy Agency (2021) has developed a detailed global forecast of employment opportunities generated by worldwide investments to meet commitments to net-zero emissions by 2050. These investments will involve trillions of dollars of new capital spending on renewable energy systems, transmission facilities, energy conservation, and related construction work. These investments would create 30 million new jobs globally by 2030: 14 million positions in clean energy systems, and 16 million in construction and retrofit work. That will far more than offset the 5 million jobs expected to disappear from the fossil fuel sector over the same period, as fossil energy is gradually phased out. The IEA forecast does not include new jobs in related manufacturing activity, nor the spillover employment (through upstream supply chains and downstream consumer industries) spurred by these enormous investments.
- Annual research has been published for a decade by the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), documenting the steady growth of global employment in renewable energy activities. Its most recent report (2023) tallies 13.7 million renewable energy jobs worldwide in 2022, up 8% from the previous year – and almost double the number 10 years earlier (in IRENA’s first report). Two-thirds of those jobs are in Asia, and over 40% are in China alone (which leads the world in new solar and wind installations). The biggest single sector for renewable energy employment is solar photovoltaic power investments, supporting 4.9 million jobs worldwide in 2022. But the employment benefits of renewable energy are widespread across several other sectors, including wind, hydro, bioenergy, geothermal, and heat pumps. The IRENA tally does not include jobs in energy conservation or upgrading work, nor jobs in manufacturing renewable energy equipment. IRENA’s research highlights especially strong job-creation potential in decentralized projects, such as small-scale hydropower and decentralized solar installations.
- A project to catalogue the global employment benefits from renewable energy and emissions-reduction investments in five case-study countries was undertaken by the United Nations International Development Organization and the Global Green Growth Initiative (2015). This project estimated the macroeconomic and employment effects of an investment programme worth 1.5% of national GDP in Brazil, Germany, Indonesia, South Africa, and South Korea. The investment was divided between renewable energy projects and energy conservation and emissions reduction projects. The employment impacts of these investments considerably outweighed employment declines associated with fossil fuel production. The employment benefits of energy transition investments were greater in developing countries (due to lower wage levels and greater labour-intensity of production methods). Final employment created for each $1 million (U.S.) of investment ranged from 9.5 in Germany to over 100 in Indonesia.
- An especially ambitious modeling exercise was undertaken by Jacobson et al. (2017) to simulate a road-map for steep emission reduction (consistent with limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees C) in 139 countries by 2050. The research first compiled a plan for the scale and composition of investments required to achieve such emissions reduction. It then estimated the combined employment effects of those investments, across all 139 countries included in the project, on the basis of employment coefficients for specific types of investment spending and energy production. It anticipated a total of 52 million new jobs to be created by those investments over the period to 2050, almost double the 27 million jobs expected to disappear from fossil fuel production and use over the same period.
- A team at the University of Massachusetts Amherst has developed a template methodology for estimating the employment gains from green energy investment plans in various U.S. states, and nationally. One recent application of that template is reported by Pollin et al. (2023), describing the estimated employment impacts of three major energy-related initiatives of the Biden administration: the Bipartisan Infrastructure Legislation, the Inflation Reduction Act, and the CHIPS Act (Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors). Applying employment input coefficients across all industries affected by the various measures in that Act, and capturing indirect (supply chain) and induced (consumer spending) effects, the research predicted an average of 2.9 million new jobs over the first five years of the measures. The construction sector alone was expected to add almost one-half million new jobs under the combined effect of the three bills.
- The C40 network of mayors of major global cities (C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, 2021) modeled the employment impacts from a proposed major green investment programme for 96 cities around the world – recognizing that large urban centres face particular challenges and opportunities in transitioning to renewable energy. Their green recovery scenario sees over 50 million net new jobs created in those city regions by 2030, powered by capital investments in renewable energy systems, urban transit, conservation and building retrofits, and other emissions reduction projects. Each $1 million U.S. in green capital spending supports 10 to 21 job-years of new employment – considerably more than conventional carbon-intensive projects and energy systems. The faster the commitment to renewable energy investments, the larger are the job benefits: in an accelerated green investment scenario (which would speed up capital spending by 2 years), some 80 million net new jobs are created in the 96 cities in the same time frame. As a case study, the C40 work also featured a focused analysis of investment and employment opportunities arising from the energy transition in Canada (Berensson et al., 2021). Their analysis forecast up to 1.8 million new person-years of employment in Canada arising between 2020 and 2030 from a major emissions-reduction investment scheme in 12 large cities, including construction, manufacturing, and operating and maintenance roles. Building construction and retrofits accounted for over half of that total.
- A group of researchers (Batinit et al., 2022) conducted simulations of the impacts of investments in a variety of carbon-neutral or carbon-sink projects – ranging from non-emitting power generation to environmental reclamation. Including indirect effects through supply chains, and induced impacts on downstream consumer spending, these projects generated strong multiplier effects, ranging from 1.1 to 1.7. Multiplier effects consistently larger than one indicate that each dollar invested in one of these projects, generates a final magnified impact on total economic output (and hence on employment), larger than the size of the initial investment. In contrast, fossil fuel investment projects have total multiplier effects less than one: ranging from 0.4 to 0.7. Climate-friendly investments thus generate more than twice as much final economic output as fossil fuel projects, per dollar invested.
- Very similar results were generated by another macroeconomic study (Shah and Wu, 2025) comparing investments in both renewable energy and energy efficiency measures, with traditional non-eco-friendly investment projects. In this study, as well, renewable energy and energy efficiency projects generate multiplier effects consistently greater than one in the medium-term, indicating that the final impact on GDP is larger than the amount initially invested. The multiplier impacts were somewhat stronger for energy conservation initiatives (such as building retrofits), ranging up to 1.3, than for renewable energy projects (1.0-1.1). Investments in fossil fuel projects and other non-eco-friendly investments were much lower than one (in the rang of 0.3 in the medium-term), reflecting their low labour intensity.
Batini, Nicoletta, Mario Di Serio, Matteo Fragetta, Giovanni Melina, and Anthony Waldron (2022). “Building back better: How big are green spending multipliers?,” Ecological Economics 193, March.
Berensson, Markus, et al. (2021). Canada: The Case for an Urban Green and Just Recovery, Technical Report(London: C40 Cities), https://www.greenpolicyplatform.org/sites/default/files/C40%20Cities%20(2021)%20Canada%20-%20The%20case%20for%20an%20urban%20green%20and%20just%20recovery%20(Technical%20report).pdf.
Bridge, Tyee, and Jim Stanford (2025). Jobs for Today: Canada’s Building Trades and the Net-Zero Transition, Centre for Civic Governance, https://ccg.eco/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Jobs_for_Today_Report.pdf.
C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group (2021), The Case for a Green and Just Recovery (London: C40 Cities), https://c40.my.salesforce.com/sfc/p/#36000001Enhz/a/1Q000000gRCH/24OgSbRwj1hZ305yJbyPMZJQKhXXWNYE8k8sr2ADsi8
Clean Energy Canada (2019). Missing the Bigger Picture (Vancouver: Clean Energy Canada), https://cleanenergycanada.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Report_TER2019_CleanJobs_20190516_v3_ForWeb_FINAL.pdf.
Clean Energy Canada (2021). The New Reality (Vancouver: Clean Energy Canada), https://cleanenergycanada.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Report_CEC_CleanJobs2021.pdf.
Dunsky Energy Consulting (2018). The Economic Impact of Improved Energy Efficiency in Canada: Employment and Other Economic Outcomes from the Pan-Canadian Framework’s Energy Efficiency Measures (Montreal: Dunsky Energy Consulting), https://cleanenergycanada.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/TechnicalReport_EnergyEfficiency_20180403_FINAL.pdf.
Ecology Action Centre (2019). Nova Scotia Environmental Goals and Sustainable Prosperity Act: Economic Costs and Benefits for Proposed Goals (Halifax: Ecology Action Centre), https://ecologyaction.ca/sites/default/files/2022-06/EAC_GP_Climate%20Jobs%20Report_Sept2019_0.pdf
Guldimann, Colin, and Naomi Powell (2022). Green Collar Jobs: The skills revolution Canada needs to reach Net Zero (Toronto: RBC Canada), https://thoughtleadership.rbc.com/green-collar-jobs-the-skills-revolution-canada-needs-to-reach-net-zero/.
International Energy Agency (2021). Net Zero by 2050 (Paris: International Energy Agency), https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/deebef5d-0c34-4539-9d0c-10b13d840027/NetZeroby2050-ARoadmapfortheGlobalEnergySector_CORR.pdf.
International Renewable Energy Agency (2023). Renewable Energy and Jobs Annual Review 2023 (Abu Dhabi: IRENA), https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2023/Sep/IRENA_Renewable_energy_and_jobs_2023.pdf.
Jacobson, Mark Z., et al. (2017). “100% Clean and Renewable Wind, Water, and Sunlight All-Sector Energy Roadmaps for 139 Countries of the World,” Joule 1(1), pp. 108-121, Supplementary Tables Available at https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S2542435117300120-mmc1.pdf.
Kaddoura, Saeed, et al. (2020). Alberta’s Emerging Economy: A Blueprint for Job Creation through 2030(Calgary: Pembina Institute), https://www.pembina.org/reports/albertas-emerging-economy.pdf.
Lee, Marc, and Seth Klein (2020). Winding Down BC’s Fossil Fuel Industries: Planning for Climate Justice in a Zero-Carbon Economy (Vancovuer: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives), https://www.policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/files/uploads/publications/BC%20Office/2020/03/ccpa-bc_Winding-Down-BCs-Fossil-Fuel-Industries.pdf.
Lee, Marc, Caroline Brouillette, and Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood (2023). Spending What it Takes: Transformational Climate Investments for Long-Term Prosperity in Canada (Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives), https://policyalternatives.ca/publications/reports/spending-what-it-takes.
Navius Research (2019). Quantifying Canada’s Clean Energy Economy: An Assessment of Clean Energy Investment, Value-Added and Jobs (Vancouver, Navius Research), https://cleanenergycanada.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/2019-03-13-Clean-Energy-Economy-FINAL-REPORT.pdf.
Shah, Syed Sadaqat Ali, and Kai Wu (2025). “How effective are green spending multipliers? Eco-friendly vs non-eco-friendly spending in OECD economies,” Energy Policy 204, September.
Stanford, Jim (2021). Employment Transitions and the Phase-Out of Fossil Fuels, (Vancouver: Centre for Future Work), 113 pp., https://centreforfuturework.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Employment-Transitions-Report-Final.pdf.
Thomas, Stephen, and Tom Green (2022). Shifting Power: Zero-Emissions Electricity Across Canada by 2035(Vancouver: David Suzuki Foundation), https://davidsuzuki.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Shifting-Power-Zero-Emissions-Across-Canada-By-2035-Report.pdf.
United Nations International Development Organization and the Global Green Growth Initiative (2015). Global Green Growth: Clean Energy Industry Investments and Expanding Job Opportunities (Vienna: UNIDO), https://gggi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/2015-06-Global-Green-Growth-Clean-Energy-Industrial-Investments-and-Expanding-Job-Opportunities-Overall-findings.pdf.
Xuereb, Slias, and Inez Hillel (2023). Job Creation Through Transformational Climate Investments: Assessing the Impact of Proposed Climate Investments in Canada (Ottawa: Vivic Research), https://vivicresearch.ca/work/employment-impacts-of-spending-what-it-takes
The post Annotated Bibliography on the Net Employment Benefits of the Energy Transition appeared first on Centre for Future Work.
A Matrix of Care: What does ‘care’ really mean in agroecology?
Rail Union calls for Free Fares to cut cost of living in response to war on Iran
Rail Union calls for Free Fares to cut cost of living in response to war on Iran
Photo by Nick Fewings on Unsplash
Transport and travel union TSSA has called on the government to take immediate action to help the public with the cost of living in the face of ongoing economic volatility related to the US/Israel conflict with Iran.This includes making public transport free at the point of use for the next year.
Read the full statement on the TSSA site here.
TSSA’s Earth Day Blog Rails of change: why public transport is our climate lifeline assesses the rising impact of the Transport sector on carbon emissions, the opportunities presented by rail nationalisation to join up transport policy, boost electrification, shift freight and for City Mayors to run with this agenda.
On this Earth Day, as the sun sets through a haze of Saharan dust, let us look not to the sky for salvation, but to the railway tracks. The solution to the climate crisis is not a sci-fi technology; it is a reliable, frequent, electric train. Let’s fight for it.
Read the whole blog here. Online Thursday April 23 – 5.50 – 7.00 We’ll see you there! Join Us
Get in the loop! Sign up to receive future GJA Newsletters and Blogs here.
SIGN UP Join the debateSend us your contribution to the debate. We will contact you about using it here on our News & Debate page.
Name
Contribution
SubmitThe post Rail Union calls for Free Fares to cut cost of living in response to war on Iran first appeared on Greener Jobs Alliance.
Shareholder Vote for Paramount-Warner Bros. Deal Won’t Be the Final Word on This Dangerous Mega-Merger
On Thursday, Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) shareholders voted to accept Paramount Skydance’s $110 billion bid to acquire the news and entertainment company. The merger of these two companies would create a media colossus with CBS, CNN, HBO, Nickelodeon, Warner Bros. Pictures and Paramount Pictures — among other major media properties — all under one roof.
The vote follows a week of protests against the deal led by a coalition of First Amendment advocates, unions, democracy defenders and even famous Hollywood actors and directors who say that the deal would give one company the power and incentives to raise prices, lay off thousands of workers and limit consumer options, while giving one family — the Ellisons — the power to shape public discourse to suit their political agenda and that of their allies in the Trump White House.
Free Press Co-CEO Craig Aaron said:
“Today, Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders voted for their short-term financial gains, not for the public good. While shareholders voted against fat pay packages for departing executives — a symbolic rebuke, since the board doesn’t have to listen to them — they’ve opened the door to wholesale layoffs across the news and entertainment industry, more propaganda in news coverage, higher prices for consumers and fewer choices for audiences across the United States and around the world. But shareholders don’t get the final word.
“That’s why we have antitrust enforcers and courts of law. With Trump officials cheering on this deal, state attorneys general must investigate this massive industry consolidation and step in to stop Paramount’s takeover. This mega-merger will diminish creativity and diversity in entertainment, weaken journalists’ ability to expose wrongdoing and hold those in power accountable and further endanger our democracy. It also concentrates far too much media power in the hands of one company and one family, the Ellisons.
“This corrupt merger is far from a done deal. Just because Paramount shareholders won’t take a stand against billionaire and White House control of the media, it doesn’t mean we can’t. While Paramount is flaunting its corruption and fêting Trump officials, we’re standing with the workers and artists at the heart of the news and entertainment industries — and with the American public, which deserves more than an ever-shrinking circle of control over what they see, hear and read.”
Background:
April has seen widespread and growing popular opposition to the Paramount/WBD merger. Last week, nearly 4,000 professionals across the film and television industry signed an open letter declaring their opposition to the pending deal.
On Wednesday, Free Press and the American Economic Liberties Project hosted a press call with former FTC Commissioner Alvaro Bedoya, Writers Guild of America West President Michele Mulroney, former CNN Chief White House Correspondent Jim Acosta and Oscar-winning director David Borenstein to detail the many reasons this deal should not go through and call on state attorneys general to investigate and oppose the merger. Free Press and allied organizations also delivered 171,000 signed petitions to Rob Bonta’s office, urging the California attorney general to investigate.
On Thursday morning, protesters gathered with New York City Public Advocate Jumaane Williams, former New York City Comptroller Brad Lander and Congressman Dan Goldman outside WBD’s New York City headquarters, where they urged action to stop this dangerous merger from going forward. In addition, New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani issued a statement via social media: “Today, as Warner Bros. and Paramount shareholders vote, New York City is on record: this merger should be stopped.”
Industry Insider Seeks to Eviscerate U.S. Forest Service
As the country hurtles toward a potentially record-setting fire season, a recent announcement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture to drastically resize and restructure the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) would effectively eviscerate key research and protections for the nation’s public lands, according to a new report released today by Public Citizen.
“Restructuring the Forest Service in this way will dramatically reduce its ability to conduct scientific research,” said Lois Parshley, research director with Public Citizen’s Climate Program and author of the report. “These relocations will undermine key data collection needed to understand climate change.”
Schultz’s restructuring of the USFS would close two-thirds of the agency’s research stations, disrupting data collection on long-running experiments. The shift will reduce the agency’s ability to collect environmental data, weaken its capacity to track conditions, and hamper research that informs land management decisions.
The agency’s headquarters, which have been located in Washington for more than a century, would be relocated to Salt Lake City, and approximately 260 employees have been informed they must relocate or lose their jobs—a move that echoes the first Trump administration’s relocation of the Bureau of Land Management to Grand Junction, Colorado.
The two leaders at the center of the evisceration have longstanding conflicts with the USFS. Before Schultz’s appointment to lead the USFS, he worked at the Idaho Forest Group, one of the country’s largest lumber producers. Within months of taking office, Schultz began implementing policies aligned with positions he advocated as a timber industry representative.
Michael Boren, the USDA’s Undersecretary of Agriculture for Natural Resources and Environment, which oversees the agency, once faced a restraining order for allegedly buzzing a U.S. Forest Service trail crew at low altitude in a helicopter. Boren also ran afoul of the government by building a private airstrip on national recreation land and an unauthorized cabin on national forest land.
“As an industry executive, Schultz advocated to reduce environmental reviews and more recently testified to Congress in support of an industry wish list,” said Parshley. “DOGE cuts and an early retirement program drove nearly a fifth of Forest Service employees to leave the agency last year. Fewer people are being asked to do more, at the same time as fire seasons are growing longer and forests are under mounting stress from climate change.”
Bill that helps transition ADN nurses to employment moves forward
Pages
The Fine Print I:
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this site are not the official position of the IWW (or even the IWW’s EUC) unless otherwise indicated and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone but the author’s, nor should it be assumed that any of these authors automatically support the IWW or endorse any of its positions.
Further: the inclusion of a link on our site (other than the link to the main IWW site) does not imply endorsement by or an alliance with the IWW. These sites have been chosen by our members due to their perceived relevance to the IWW EUC and are included here for informational purposes only. If you have any suggestions or comments on any of the links included (or not included) above, please contact us.
The Fine Print II:
Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc.
It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.
This site is not the official webpage of the Industrial Workers of the World.